BUSN20019 ASSESSMENT 1 Step 1 – MARKING RUBRIC In case of high Turnitin similarity scores, markers analyse the similarity score on a case by case basis and you will see relevant comments in your...

1 answer below »
you will get data report from Woolworth website.try to insert all the links for annual reports including page number.please give this assignment on Friday night.


BUSN20019 ASSESSMENT 1 Step 1 – MARKING RUBRIC In case of high Turnitin similarity scores, markers analyse the similarity score on a case by case basis and you will see relevant comments in your assignment, if necessary. Late submission penalties are being applied to this assignment as per the university regulations. Any students deemed to have conducted Academic Misconduct are being reported and will be informed of the outcome of the investigation and any related penalties via their student email address. Each student must complete the 3 minutes tutorial presentation in either week 2 or 4, before submitting this assessment to receive a feedback on assessment 1.1. Criteria 0 (Not Shown) 1 (Poor) 2 (Unsatisfactory) 3 (Satisfactory) 4 (Good) 5 (Very Good) 6 (Excellent) 1. Clarity and suitability of statement of 'field of research' 10% No field of research included or inappropriate field of research and /or no mention of the profession. Field of research statement is highly unclear and/or entirely unsuitable and/or no mention of the profession. Field of research statement is unclear and/or unsuitable and/or no mention of the profession. Reasonable field of research statement that is, however, not entirely clear and/or suitable. Profession may be implied rather than clear. Generally good field of research statement but may lack consistency, clarity and/or suitability. Relevance to the profession is mentioned. Very clear field of research statement with suitable relevance to the profession explained. Field of research statement is entirely clear and suitable with faultless and integrated explanation of relevance to the profession. 2. Suitability of data sources (raw publicly available secondary data sources/links) 20% No data sources included or attempt to use academic literature as data. Highly unclear or highly unsuitable data sources included and/or very poorly explained. Unclear or unsuitable data sources included and/or poorly explained. Based on the explanation, this project may contain suitable data sources but this requires further explanation to be fully clear. Suitable data sources although more clarity and/or better explanation is required. Suitable data sources included although some minor inconsistencies and/or unclear areas. Highly suitable data sources included and well explained. 3. Research questions 20% Entirely unsuitable or irrelevant RQs or missing. Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Effective presentation of RQs; may be inconsistent or somewhat unclear Convincing presentation of RQs; may be slightly inconsistent or unclear Highly competent presentation of RQs; consistent and clear Superior presentation of RQs; entirely consistent and clear 4. Search terms 10% Missing or entirely unsuitable or irrelevant. Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Effective search terms; may be somewhat inconsistent or unclear. Convincing search terms; may be slightly inconsistent or unclear. Very good search terms; consistent and clear. Excellent search terms; well thought through and logical; fully consistent and clear. 5. Ability to integrate sources into academic writing 20% No academic sources used or no appropriate sentences written or no reference list included. Less than 3 academic sources used and/or very poor integration into sentences and/or very poor reference list. Less than 3 academic sources used and/or poor integration into sentences and/or poor reference list. 3 academic sources placed into reasonable sentences although not well integrated; satisfactory referencing skills. 3 academic sources placed into well written sentences although not well integrated; good referencing skills. 3 academic sources reasonably well integrated into well-written sentences; very good referencing skills. 3 (or more) academic sources integrated very well into sophisticated sentences with faultless referencing. 6. Professional presentation and accuracy of work 20% Highly unprofessional work in terms of formatting, writing and/or referencing. Inaccurate. Unprofessional work in terms of formatting, writing and/or referencing. Inaccurate. Unprofessional work in terms of formatting, writing or referencing. Inaccurate. Satisfactory and reasonably accurate work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. More professionalism is required. Generally professional and accurate work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. Some mistakes and/or omissions may be present. Very professional and accurate work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. Minor errors and/or omissions are acceptable. Highly professional work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. Faultlessly accurate. BUSN20019 ASSESSMENT 1 Step 1 – MARKING RUBRIC In case of high Turnitin similarity scores, m arkers analyse the similarity score on a case by case basis and you will see relevant comments in your assignment, if necessary. Late submission penalties are being applied to this assignment as per the university regulations. Any students deemed to have conducted Academic Misconduct are being reported and will be informed of the outcome of the inves tigation and any related penalties via their student email addr ess. Each student must complete the 3 minutes tutorial presentation in either week 2 or 4, before submitting this assessment to receive a feedback on assessment 1.1 . Criteria 0 (Not Shown) 1 (Poor) 2 (Unsatisfactory) 3 (Satisfactory) 4 ( Good ) 5 ( Very Good) 6 (Excellent ) 1. Clarity and suitability of statement of 'field of research' 1 0% No field of research included or inappropriate field of research and /or no mention of the profession. Field of research statement is highly unclear and/or entirely unsuitable and/or no mention of the profession. Field of research statement is unclear and/or unsuitable and/or no mention of the profession. Reasonable field of research statement that is, however, not entirely clear and/or suitable. Profession may be imp lied rather than clear. Generally good field of research statement but may lack consistency, clarity and/or suitability. Relevance to the profession is mentioned. Very clear field of research statement with suitable relevance to the profession explained. Field of research statement is entirely clear and suitable with faultless and integrated explanation of relevance to the profession. 2. Suitability of data sources ( raw publicly available secondary data sources/links ) 2 0% No data sources included or attempt to use academic literature as data. Highly unclear or highly unsuitable data sources included and/or very poorly explained. Unclear or unsuitable data sources included and/or poorly explained. Based on the explanation, this project may contain suitable data sources but this requires further explana tion to be fully clear. Suitable data sources although more clarity and/or better explanation is required. Suitable data sources included although some minor inconsistencies and/or unclear areas. Highly suitable data sources included and well explained. 3. Research questions 20% Entirely unsuitable or irrelevant RQs or missing. Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Effective presentation of RQs; may be inconsistent or somewhat unclear Convincing presentation of RQs; may be slightly inconsistent or unclear Highly competent presentation of RQs; consistent and clear Superior presentation of RQs; entirely consistent and clear 4 . Search terms 1 0% Missing or entirely unsuitable or irrelevant. Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Incomplete OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too vague/too many Effective search terms; may be somewhat inconsistent or unclear. Convincing search terms; may be slightly inconsistent or unclear. Very good search terms; consistent and clear. Excellent search terms; well thought through and logical; fully consistent and clear. 5 . Ability to integrate sources into academic writing 20% No academic sources used or no appropriate sentences written or no reference list included. Less than 3 academic sources used and/or very poor integration into sentences and/or very poor reference list. Less than 3 academic sources used and/or poor integration into sentences and/or poor reference list. 3 academic sources placed into reasonable sentences although not well integrated; satisfactory referencing skills. 3 academic sources placed into well written sentences although not well integrated; good referencing skills. 3 academic sources reasonably well integrated into well - written sentences; very good referencing skills. 3 (or more) academic sources integ rated very well into sophisticated sentences with faultless referencing. 6 . Professional presentation and accuracy of work 2 0% Highly unprofessional work in terms of formatting, writing and/or referencing. Inaccurate. Unprofessional work in terms of formatting, writing and/or referencing. Inaccurate. Unprofessional work in terms of formatting, writing or referencing. Inaccurate. Satisfactory and reasonably accurate work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. More professionalism is required. Generally professional and accurate work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. Some mistakes and/or omissions may be present. Very professional and accurate work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. Minor errors and/or omissions are acceptable. Highly professional work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing. Faultlessly accurate. BUSN20019 ASSESSMENT 1 Step 1 – MARKING RUBRIC In case of high Turnitin similarity scores, markers analyse the similarity score on a case by case basis and you will see relevant comments in your assignment, if necessary. Late submission penalties are being applied to this assignment as per the university regulations. Any students deemed to have conducted Academic Misconduct are being reported and will be informed of the outcome of the investigation and any related penalties via their student email address
Answered Same DayAug 07, 2021BUSN20019Central Queensland University

Answer To: BUSN20019 ASSESSMENT 1 Step 1 – MARKING RUBRIC In case of high Turnitin similarity scores, markers...

Soumi answered on Aug 08 2021
134 Votes
Running Head: PROJECT PLAN        1
PROJECT PLAN         2
EFFECT OF CULTURAL DIVERSITY ON COMPANY (WOOLWORTHS) PERFORMANCE
PROJECT PLAN
Table of Contents
1. Field of Research    3
2. Source o
f Secondary Data    3
3. Research Questions    3
4. Search Terms    3
5. Literature Review of Selected Peer-Reviewed Articles    3
References    4
1. Field of Research
Cultural diversity is a common aspect in large-sized business organisations, such as supermarkets, as these kinds of organisations require a large number of employees as their workforce and as a result, they provide employment to a wide range of people, who come from various cultural backgrounds. Therefore, usually, in supermarkets, customers can find employees from different culture, attending them and thus, they are able to meet the varied product demands of the customers, who belong to their respective individual culture backgrounds (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2018). However, as argued by Frijns, Dodd and Cimerova (2016), this can also lead on a number of negative impacts if not managed properly, such as miscommunication, barriers in interactions and lack of cultural awareness leading on to dissatisfied employees. Consequently, such employees perform poorly, thus, affecting the overall performance of the company (Bouncken, Brem & Kraus, 2016). Hence, the proposed research aims to focus on the effects of cultural diversity on the performance of Woolworths, one of the highest revenue generating supermarkets of Australia.
2. Source of Secondary Data
In the specific context of Woolworths, there are specific sites, from where the data reports of the company could be generated, such as its latest annual report of 2018, retrieved from https://www.woolworthsgroup.com.au/icms_docs/195396_annual-report-2018.pdf (pages 7-16), latest sustainability report of 2018,...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here