Your assessment will include two sections: a literature review and a proposed study design. Your...

Question

Your assessment will include two sections: a literature review and a proposed study design. Your literature review must demonstrate the gap in the literature and the question that you are attempting to answer with your proposed study. Your proposal must include the a hypothesis, anticipated participants, methods and statistical analyses. This will help you gain experience in the design and proposal of scientific investigations.SPE3MBS Literature review and study design topic list This list is intended to provide you with a guide as to the types of topics or questions you may like to  look at as part of your assessment task. This is not exhaustive, and is meant to point you in the right  direction and provide some ideas. - Bilateral transfer in Australian rules football kicking  - How does task familiarity affect decision-making?  - Bilateral transfer in soccer dribbling  - The effect of vision training on reaction time in tennis  - The effect of different types of augmented feedback in basketball free throws  - Is knowledge of results or knowledge of performance more effective for improving javelin  technique?  - What kind of feedback is most effective for refining tennis backhand strokes?  - The effect of practice scheduling on the retention and/or transfer of dart throwing skills  - The effect of contextual interference on the performance of a 100m sprint  - The effect of contextual interference on the decision-making of hockey umpires  - Does an internal focus of attention lead to better learning of gymnastic skills?  - What is the best way to develop dual-tasking skills?  - Cueing in skill development  - Haptic feedback for learning complex skills  - Does the representativeness of the environment affect penalty kick performance in soccer?  - Does adding a defender change skill performance in basketball shooting?  - How does manipulation of task constraints affect head positioning in backstroke?  - Changes in reaction time with age/injury/illness  - Is there a difference between the perceptual skills of a novice snowboarder vs an expert?  - How does mental fatigue affect accuracy in ten-pin bowling?  - The effect of mental fatigue on running technique  - Does the presence of a scoreboard affect performance in taekwondo?  - Gender differences in skill learning  - Does Fitt’s Law apply for athletes with muscular dystrophy?  - How does manipulation of environmental constraints affect diving performance?  - What are the best coaching techniques to make minor skill changes permanent?     College of Science, Health and Engineering  School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport  Department of Dietetics, Nutrition and Sport Subject Title:   Motor Behaviour in Sport  Subject Code:  SPE3MBS  Period of Delivery:  Semester 2 2021  Assessment Title:  Literature Review and Study Design  Assessment Number: 3  Assessment Type:  Written Report  Assessment Weighting: This assessment accounts for 50% of your overall mark  Submission Deadline: 31/10/2021 (Exam Block); 11:59pm (online)  Submission Format: Electronic submission via TurnItIn  Feedback and marks: Both feedback (in the form of written comments) and your  marks will usually be available within three weeks of  submission. Samples of work will be moderated in line with University guidance to ensure fairness of the  marking process. Assessment Length: 2500 words Assessment Overview  This project is designed to help you to develop your writing and researching skills,  particularly your ability to search, interpret and synthesise existing literature and develop  research proposals. Individually, you will write a 2500-word document that consists of  literature review and proposal for a new research study which builds on existing knowledge. Formatting Requirements  This assessment should be competed in a suitable program (e.g. MS Word) and using a  suitable font and size, such as Times New Roman (12pt), Calibri (11pt – MS Word default)  or Arial (12pt). Text should be double spaced and justified. The American Psychological Association (APA) 6thor 7th referencing format should be  used for this assessment.   Assessment Detail  You will choose a current issue in the field of motor behaviour and write a 2500-word  proposal for a new research study that builds on existing knowledge in the area. You will  begin by performing a literature search for appropriate resources and building an annotated  bibliography on these sources. You will then participate in a peer-review seminar to evaluate  each other’s sources and depth/breadth of research. After the peer-review session, you will  turn your annotated bibliography into a literature review and propose the methods for a new  research study that builds on the existing knowledge in the space.   This assessment will be developed during tutorial classes over the course of the semester.  You may pick any topic related to the field of motor behaviour, such as those covered in  lectures and practicals. A suggested topic list will be made available. If you choose another  topic, it is recommended that you check the topic with the subject coordinator to ensure it will  meet the requirements.   Your assessment will include two sections: a literature review and a proposed study design.  Your literature review must demonstrate the gap in the literature and the question that you  are attempting to answer with your proposed study. Your proposal must include the a  hypothesis, anticipated participants, methods and statistical analyses. This will help you gain  experience in the design and proposal of scientific investigations.   This document must be submitted to TurnItIn (link in the LMS) by the submission deadline  (17/10/2021, 11:59pm). Documents submitted after the deadline will attract penalties in line  with the University’s policies for late work.  Please see below for detailed instructions and the marking rubric. Writing Your Proposal  Your proposal must include the following:  Title  - Descriptive but brief title of your proposed research  Introduction (Literature Review)  - A detailed literature review indicating the background of the problem and key  concepts, recent work in the field, and a clear indication of the gap that your  proposed work will address.   - At least three (5) references demonstrating the depth and breadth of your reading  - At least one testable hypothesis  Proposed Method  - Must include  o Number and description of participants  o Proposed procedures  o Proposed analysis methods  Reference  - Your references and in-text citations must be in APA format (6th or 7th edition) Learning Outcomes Assessed  Subject Intended Learning Outcomes (SILOs)  Outcome On completion of this unit you should be able to:  Assessment  number  3  Appraise motor control function in a range of populations using  appropriate testing methods  2  4  Critically review the changes in motor behaviour with learning and  expertise, aging, and injury  2  5  Select and justify appropriate methods used to measure expert  performance in skill acquisition and motor behaviour  2 Support for Your Assignment Lectures, Labs, Seminars: Full attendance of all timetabled sessions is expected  Review of Plans or Drafts:  Drafts and plans may be reviewed by appointment only  Additional Tutor Support: Please contact the Subject Coordinator if you have  specific questions.  Might Miss the Deadline? Where your ability to perform in an assessment or  submit a piece of work is affected by ill health or  exceptional extenuating circumstances you should  contact the Special Considerations and Compliance  Team immediately. Details can be found at  http://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/admin/forms/special -consideration  University Referencing Guide: http://www.lib.latrobe.edu.au/referencing-tool/  Contact: Should you need further information relating to this  assessment please contact:  Alexandra.roberts@latrobe.edu.au or  dave.morley@latrobe.edu.au Declaration of Originality  Please note that by submitting any assignment electronically via the LMS it is assumed by  the university that you agree to the following statement regarding originality:  I declare that this submission is my own work and should this declaration be found to be  untrue I acknowledge that I may be found guilty of committing an academic offence. http://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/admin/forms/special-consideration http://www.latrobe.edu.au/students/admin/forms/special-consideration http://www.lib.latrobe.edu.au/referencing-tool/ mailto:alexandra.roberts@latrobe.edu.au?subject=SPE1CSC%20Assessment%251 mailto:dave.morley@latrobe.edu.au?subject=SPE1CSC%20Assessment%251 Marking Rubric – Assessment 3    100-80% (A) 79-70% (B) 69 - 60% (C) 59 - 50% (D)

Rudrakshi · Accepted Answer

Running Head: ACADEMIC WRITING							1
ACADEMIC WRITING									
ACADEMIC WRITING
Table of Contents
Introduction	4
Literature review	4
Impact of gender differences in motor behaviour	4
Inflated claims of Gender differences	5
Instruction to investigate kinematics of throwing	6
Gap and Hypothesis	6
Proposal	7
Introduction	7
Background of study	7
Rationale	7
Research aim	8
Research objective	8
Research question	8
Literature review	8
Understanding of motor development difference among gender	8
Analyse the significance of motor development	9
Evaluate the fine motor development in Australia	9
Research methodology	10
Data collection and sampling technique	10
Data analysis plan	11
Ethical consideration	11
Anticipated findings	11
Conclusion	12
Introduction
The chosen topic for the current research proposal and performing literature review is gender difference in skill learning. It states that in subject of learning there is likely to be a difference in the age of attainment of motor skills amid girls and boys. It will be noted that ball skills are developed by the boys faster when compared with the girls and it is also stated that girl manually acquire the dexterity before boys. The current study will outline the literature review based on this topic.
 The differences of gender learning have shown various domains in the motor skills and behaviours with no exception. In addition to that the study will explain the robust examples of differences between women and men in a better throwing accuracy together with the better spatial ability. The proposal will be discussed finally, concluding all the results of the parameters. 
Literature review 
The basic part of the literature review explains the exploration with the differences in the throwing performance between male and female in the specific components of actions. It is demonstrated by the gender differences athletes in sport science with the similar pattern of movement in forearm and humerus actions but differed in stepping, trucking and backswing actions.  
Impact of gender differences in motor behaviour 
As stated by Fischetti, Latino, Cataldi & Greco (2020) the impact of gender differences in motor behaviour is high because the great is species of variability in the motor area is related to the men whereas women had high availability individually. This makes the huge difference between the activeness which is considered in the motor behaviour which is the difficult sign of remaining seater quietly and with preference of active games girls are characterized by the quiet behaviour in the modern automation emotional sense obviously. When it is compared to girls boys generally have an aggressive behaviour in the mode of Sports Science as they grow up older they can jump improve their seat and walking in the apartment with exports and can enjoy practicing sports more frequently than women. 
In the mixture of different neuropsychological criteria: velocity or accuracy, men showed the greatest genetic advantage, due to women having greater functional capacity (functions of psychomotor in women were easier to train). Males outperformed females in further stereotypical multisensory activities, whereas females outperformed males in novel sensory activities. In the motor area, men showed more species variance, but women had more individual factors. Ladies were even more creative in behavioural motions therefore, in certain instances, did not behave like themselves (Lai & Szatmari 2020). 
A strong correlation was reached: it was a manifestation of common attitudes toward women as unsteady and unexpected in compared to males. The researchers found that men were superior at motor abilities like shooting, grasping, and hurling, while women were better at activities that required accuracy and delicate manual dexterity.
Inflated claims of Gender differences 
Psychological differences in the gender magnitude of question are much higher than the academic concern. It includes serious cost of over inflated claims in gender differences in motor behaviour. The cost is occurred in different areas that include relationships parenting and work. It is argued that women can you speak in a different moral voice than men and it is well known example of differences model (Lewandowsky,  Woike & Oberauer 2020). Men always remain in the voice of justice and on the other hand women got the charm of moral voice caring characteristics. 
Despite of the meta-analysis the gender difference is considered as permeated in Australian culture and overinflated costs in this aspect has the consequence that reifies the stereotyping the women and men. Genders are informed that they are as distinct as if people originated from separate galaxies and also that they converse in widely differing ways in the area of personal straight relationships. 
When a relational problem arises, effective communication is essential to addressing the issue. If, but at the other hand, females and males accept what they have been advised it really is nearly difficult for them both to connect with one another they may decide to give up attempting to settle disagreement via enhanced collaboration. Psychologists will have to refute myths about vast, unbreachable sexual divides in the sport science.
The demographic complementarily theory has significant consequences for operators, as numerous of such instances demonstrate. This same assumption believes males and females possess intrinsic difficulty talking beyond gender lines is not based on empirical research. The research also contradicts conventional notion that teenage females are really the only ones who suffer from low levels of self (Connolly, Goossen & Hjerm 2020).

SPE3MBS Literature review and study design topic list This list is intended to provide you with a guide as to the types of topics or questions you may like to look at as part of your assessment task....

Answer To: SPE3MBS Literature review and study design topic list This list is intended to provide you with a...

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment