PSYC4200 Argumentative Essay

1 answer below »
PSYC4200 Argumentative Essay


1 PSYC4200 Argumentative Essay Purpose: To develop skills in describing, critically evaluating evidence and presenting an argument. Worth: 30%; Length: 1500 words Word limits include headings, sub-headings, in-text citations, quotes and referencing, but does not include the list of references, appendices and footnotes. The word limit will allow a tolerance of 10% and any work after the maximum word limit will not be included within the allocation of marks. In other words, the marker will STOP reading at 1650 words. Due: Wednesday 18th May, 11:59 pm (Week 11) Learning outcomes: 1 and 2 Instructions: STEP 1: Please choose from one of the topics below • An argument for or against standardised testing for entry into university courses • An argument for or against standardised testing of adults for job applications (e.g., intelligence) • An argument for or against regular developmental screening of all infants • An argument for or against the use of NAPLAN in schools • An argument for or against tests in situations where the respondents have a vested interest (e.g., organisational, forensic) STEP 2: Please choose a position in relation to that argument STEP 3: Search the literature for evidence to support your argument and/or evidence that weakens the opposing position of the argument STEP 4: Please use the following structure in your essay with the following three main parts: • Claim/thesis/argument/proposal o Starting by presenting an argument • Support o Evidence to back up the argument • Warrant o Summarising explanation of how the evidence supports the argument To further elaborate on this structure: • Cohesive narrative linking introduction, body and conclusion • First paragraph: o Brief background + why it’s important o Clear, concise, well-defined thesis statement/argument 2 • Unlike a mystery novel where you find out at the end, make it easy for the markers to identify your argument. e.g.,: (adapted from http://www.phrasebank.manchester.ac.uk/introducing-work/) In this essay, it is argued that … This essay attempts to show that … The central thesis of this essay is that … In the pages that follow, it will be argued that … In this essay, the view that will be defended is that…. • Evidence: well-researched and accurate o Draw your own conclusions based on findings in the literature and provide a critical evaluation of the literature o Tips on writing critically, http://www.phrasebank.manchester.ac.uk/being-critical/ o Can present caveats to your argument if needed o If you have your own opinions you would like to put forth, please present them as opinions rather than as evidence. ▪ Importantly, this isn’t an opinion piece per se, but an argumentative piece that is backed up by research evidence. ▪ Please make it clear what is your view and what is another author’s view. • Conclusion: revisit thesis statement/argument in light of evidence; draw it all together to demonstrate how the evidence supports your argument o http://www.phrasebank.manchester.ac.uk/writing-conclusions/ SEE MARKING RUBRIC FOR MORE DETAILS Extra resources • This document has tips on presenting an argument (thesis) in writing https://www.newcastle.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/333763/LD-7-Steps-to-a-Killer- Essay-2018-LH.pdf • https://www.newcastle.edu.au/current-students/support/academic/workshops-consultations- advisors/learning-resources/writing-skills • Rottenberg, A.T. (2012). The structure of argument, 7th Edition. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins Books • Baker, J. Brizee, A. & Angeli, E. (2013, October 3). Argumentative Essays. Retrieved from https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/685/05/ • Note, courtesy of Assoc. Prof Mark Rubin, the following resources are really useful for writing https://bit.ly/2s3PkV0 3
Answered Same DayMay 23, 2022

Answer To: PSYC4200 Argumentative Essay

Dr. Saloni answered on May 24 2022
92 Votes
Running Head: NAPLAN 1
NAPLAN is Effective
Contents
Introduction    3
Background    3
Benefits and Purpose of NAPLAN    4
Improves Teaching and Schools    4
Transparency    4
Accountability    5
Common Criticism    6
No Apparent Improvement in Performance    6
Harms Students    7
The Test is too
Restrictive    8
Conclusion    8
References    10
Introduction
Since Rudd Labor management launched the NAPLAN (National Assessment Plan—Literacy and Numeracy tests) in 2008, they have been a matter of much debate (Lee et al., 2019). NAPLAN is contentious because certain stakeholders, including education officials and teacher unions, are worried about what they see as an unacceptable amount of responsibility for teachers and schools, an overemphasis on assessment, and the risk of inflicting student stress. While NAPLAN remains popular among parents, certain stakeholders publicly express concerns about unintended repercussions and student health. These arguments must be evaluated. No tests are flawless (Adams et al., 2020).
Moreover, assessment such as NAPLAN is a vital aspect of education for both individual students and school systems. In this essay, it is argued that NAPLAN is more essential and needed for student and educational benefits.

Background
For children in Grades 9, 7, 5, and 3, the annual NAPLAN assessments encompass four aspects: writing, reading, language conventions (grammar, punctuation, and spelling), as well as numeracy. Students attend the NAPLAN examination four times during their school careers, and the assessments occupy one week of the academic year, though many students take the exam across three-and-a-half days (Blanchette, 2020). NAPLAN is obligatory in school systems but not for individual students. Families who do not want their children to take the exam may choose to drop them. This test is never a high-stakes exam in the traditional sense since there are no adverse repercussions for students who score poorly on the exams, and NAPLAN scores do not affect teacher compensation or school financing (Roberts et al., 2019).

Benefits and Purpose of NAPLAN
Improves Teaching and Schools
Assessment is a crucial aspect of education. It serves several purposes, one of which is to provide data that may help students improve. NAPLAN, as a standardised assessment, acts as a diagnostic instrument for systems and schools, enabling the detection of issues in the educational framework over time and the evaluation of potential responses (Rogers et al., 2018). NAPLAN scores, being objective, standardised statistics, aid in the improvement of numeracy and literacy at various levels. This enables the examination of the performance of many components of the educational system, ranging from teacher practise to federal government regulatory changes (Blanchette, 2020).
NAPLAN data, for instance, is widely used to determine best practise in the case study that has resulted in significant student gains in numeracy and literacy, guiding the practises of other school systems. NAPLAN data may be used to determine pupils who are failing and require extra support at school in an attempt to avoid falling behind in numeracy and literacy. As argued by national parents’ organisations, the assessment scores are the objective tool for families to provide an overview of their children’s numeracy and literacy skills, and to work cooperatively with educators in the future to enhance academic achievement (Rogers et al., 2018).

Transparency
NAPLAN scores are released publicly and are disclosed at the state, territory, and national levels. This assures that the numeracy and literacy outcomes are transparent. If a specific state, for instance, is considerably failing, this will be publicly disclosed so that all residents are aware of this...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here