Please make 350 to 400 words

1 answer below »
Please make 350 to 400 words


10:13 «4 «w 5G @m) Done i <> Discussion 2 Authentic » and transformational v leaders EES Jackson and Parry (2018) review a range of ideas about leadership embodied in persons. Kouzes and Posner's (2012) approach to transformational leadership is compelling to many, yet it's ideals are focused on the leader as a person. * What was your initial reaction to The Kouzes and Posner (2012) model? o In what ways are your personal values reflected or ignored in this model? o How do the cautions of Ibarra (2011) temper your response”? * What alignments do you see between the mandates of Machiavelli's The Prince (Horowitz et al., 2019) and Kouzes and Posner's (2012) model? o How do the cautions of Bazerman and Tenbrunsel (2011), and Keck et al. (2020) temper your response? e Using Jackson and Parry (2018) as a binding element, what do you conclude about looking at leadership through the person who leads? Reminder When crafting the answers to these questions, please remember to integrate and cite the assigned materials. Consider bringing in additional support for your assertions. As you do, remember to both cite and reference them. Be sure to make connections between the assigned materials and your ideas. Include a reference list at the end of your submission. You don't need to write a huge essay, but it should be at least 350-400 words long (excellent responses are rarely fewer than 400 words). Your replies to others should comment on new insights you gained in reading their essays, and how their ideas did or did not change your own viewpoint. Try to respond to learners (at least two) with perspectives different from your own in order to demonstrate your understanding of other frameworks and perspectives. 10:12 «4 «w 5G @m) Done References Bazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Ethical breakdowns. Harvard Business Review, 89(4), 58-65. Horowitz, M., Machiavelli, N., Emerson, R. W., & Sunzi. (2019). Leadership: The Prince; Power; The Art of War (Condensed Classics). G&D Media. Ibarra, H. (2015). The authenticity paradox. Harvard Business Review, 93(1/2), 52-59. Jackson, B., & Parry, K. W. (2018). A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about studying leadership (3rd ed.). Sage. Keck, N., Giessner, S. R., Van Quaquebeke, N., & Kruijff, E. (2020). When do followers perceive their leaders as ethical? A relational models perspective of normatively appropriate conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(3), 477-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4055-3 Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2012). The leadership challenge workbook. [Electronic resource] (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass. Rubrics Bl Discussion 400--2 responses | Get Help
Answered Same DaySep 02, 2023

Answer To: Please make 350 to 400 words

Dipali answered on Sep 02 2023
19 Votes
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT        5
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT
Table of contents
Discussion    3
References    5
Discussion
    I first consider the Kouzes a
nd Posner (2012) paradigm for transformative leadership to be thorough and persuasive. The four core practices of setting an example, inspiring a common vision, testing the status quo, and empowering people to take action are highlighted as ways for leaders to inspire and motivate their followers. My own ideals of moral leadership, female empowerment, and the idea that managers should set an example for their people are all supported by these behaviors. But Ibarra's (2011) warnings about the authenticity conundrum provide my first response a crucial new dimension. Ibarra notes that it might be difficult for leaders to balance upholding their authenticity with the responsibilities and expectations of their positions. This warning makes me think about the tension between being a real leader and following the guidelines set out by Kouzes and Posner's approach. It makes people wonder if executives can follow a particular leadership paradigm and yet be honest. There are fascinating parallels and discrepancies between Kouzes and Posner's model and Machiavelli's "The Prince" (Horowitz et al., 2019). Both theories recognize the significance of influence and power in leadership....
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here