1Assessment BriefTCHR3001: Early Childhood MattersSummaryTitle Assessment 2Type Position paperDue Date Friday, April 12th at 11:59 pm AEST/AEDT (end of Week 6)Length 1500 wordsWeighting 50%Academic...

1 answer below »



1



Assessment Brief



TCHR3001: Early Childhood Matters



Summary



Title Assessment 2



Type Position paper



Due Date Friday, April 12th at 11:59 pm AEST/AEDT (end of Week 6)



Length 1500 words



Weighting 50%



Academic Integrity GenAI may NOT be used in this task.



Under the Rules - Student Academic and Non-Academic Misconduct



Rules (Section 3) students have the right to Appeal against the Academic



Integrity Officers academic misconduct Determination, to the Executive



Dean, with that determination being final and conclusive, and not subject to



further Appeal within the University. Students are not able to appeal



against academic misconduct via the Unit Assessor or unit staff.



Submission Word document submitted to Turnitin (do NOT submit PDF documents)



Unit Learning



Outcomes



This assessment task maps to the following ULOs:



 ULO1: Identify a range of issues important to early childhood



education and care.



 ULO2: Analyse a range of positions highlighted in authoritative



literature on contemporary issues related to early childhood



education and care.



 ULO3: Critically reflect on their personal approach/philosophy of



learning, development and teaching within early childhood



education and care in relation to contemporary issues.



 ULO4: Argue a position on current issues in early childhood



education and care, in relation to the literature



Rationale



As an early childhood teacher your beliefs form the basis of your early childhood philosophy. How



you implement this philosophy within your teaching practice will be influenced by a range of issues



within your local and broader community.



Task Description



This task requires you to analyse and evaluate the various positions of the contemporary issues



presented in Module 4 – 6. Include a personal reflection that explains your own position on a



selected issue and critically analyse and justify your personal position in relation to current,



scholarly literature.



Task Instructions



2



Assessment Brief



Drawing on the unit learning materials, unit tutorials and a range of relevant and current scholarly



literature, select one issue addressed in Module 4 to 6 of this unit and:



 Part 1: Analyse and evaluate the positions put forward on this issue within the unit



materials and discussions. (500 words)



 Part 2: Reflect on and synthesise your personal position on the issue explaining why and



how it is relevant to you personally as a teacher/educator working with children, families,



and other relevant stakeholders in the Australian early years sector (500 words).



 Part 3: Justify your personal position on the issue using a range of relevant and current



scholarly literature. (500 words).



Please note:



 Part 2 and Part 3 of this task can be written in first (“I” statements) or third person,



however you need to be consistent over the task in the tense and person you use.



 All areas of your responses to this task need to be supported by relevant and current



literature. This means you need to cite relevant and current (within the last 10 years)



literature that supports what you are saying throughout your writing.



 Please refer to your rubric for the literature that you MUST include in your responses to



each part of this task..



 Please remember that you must use scholarly literature in this task.



Please refer to the following documents to support you in addressing this task:



General:



 How to Incorporate Evidence into Your Writing - https://www.scu.edu.au/media/scu-



dep/current-students/learning-zone/quick-



guides/how_to_incorporate_evidence_into_your_writing.pdf



 Summarising and Paraphrasing - https://www.scu.edu.au/media/scu-dep/current-



students/learning-zone/quick-guides/summarising_and_paraphrasing.pdf



Part 1:



 You MUST refer to the unit learning materials and discussions in the recorded tutorial



session/s that address the issue you select.



 Look at the meaning of ‘analyse’ and ‘evaluate’ in the following document -



https://www.scu.edu.au/media/scu-dep/current-students/learning-zone/quick-



guides/common_instruction_words.pdf






Part 2:



 Read this document about Reflective Writing - https://www.scu.edu.au/media/scu-



dep/current-students/learning-zone/quick-guides/reflective_writing.pdf



Part 3:



 Look at the meaning of ‘justify’ in the following document -



https://www.scu.edu.au/media/scu-dep/current-students/learning-zone/quick-



guides/common_instruction_words.pdf



 Writing Paragraphs (PEEL method) - https://www.scu.edu.au/media/scu-dep/current-



students/learning-zone/quick-guides/writing_paragraphs.pdf



 Planning and Writing Body Paragraphs (using the PEEL method) -



https://www.scu.edu.au/media/scu-dep/current-students/learning-zone/quick-



guides/planning_and_writing_body_paragraphs.pdf



3



Assessment Brief



Formatting and style



APA 7 formatting is required for this task.



 Include a cover page that contains:



o The title of the task in bold



o Your name (as author),



o Your faculty (Faculty of Education)



o The unit code and name (TCHR3001 Early Childhood Matters)



o Your unit assessor’s name (Kelly Simpson)



o The due date



 Include a title or the prompt at the start of each response.



 Students may use headings that align with the task instructions to organise their responses.



 Indent the first line of each new paragraph.



 Use 12-point Arial font.



 Double line space your writing and your reference list.



Referencing



 APA Referencing style is required to be used for this task.



 Include one reference list for all responses on a new page at the end of your task. Place the



title References in bold in the centre at the top of this page.



 At a minimum, your sources for this task will include the EYLF (AGDE, 2022), the NQF



(ACECQA, 2023), a range of unit materials, and broader current scholarly literature.



 Broader literature may include textbooks, peer reviewed articles, and published newspaper



and/or media articles by reputable sources (for example, the ABC, The Conversation, Early



Childhood Australia)



 You need to include at least 8 scholarly references in your response to this task as well as the



unit learning materials and the EYLF (AGDE, 2022) and NQS, (ACECQA, 2023).



Resources



 Academic Integrity - https://www.scu.edu.au/about/leadership/executive/academic-



portfolio-office-apo/academic-integrity-framework/



 SCU Student Learning Zone - https://www.scu.edu.au/current-students/learning-zone/



 The Early Years Learning Framework - https://www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-



01/EYLF-2022-V2.0.pdf



 National Quality Standard - https://www.acecqa.gov.au/nqf/national-quality-standard



 Guide to the National Quality Framework (including the National Quality Standards) -



https://www.acecqa.gov.au/nqf/about/guide



Referencing Style Resource



Please refer to the APA 7th Referencing Guide for this task - https://libguides.scu.edu.au/apa



Task Submission



 Your task should be submitted using the submission point in the Turnitin folder titled



Assessment 2: Position Paper in the Assessments Tasks and Submission section on the



Blackboard TCHR3001 site. Only Microsoft Word documents submitted via the Turnitin



portal on Blackboard will be accepted. You must label your final submission with your



surname and initials and the assessment task's name, e.g. SmithJ_PositionPaper.doc



4



Assessment Brief



 You are strongly advised to undertake your own SIMILARITY CHECK via Turnitin, PRIOR to



the due date, to identify and resolve any academic integrity issues prior to submitting - see



SCU Academic Integrity and Turnitin. You can submit up to three times and receive the



similarity match report immediately – after three attempts, you will need to wait 24 hours.



 It is YOUR responsibility to ensure that you have submitted the correct file and the FINAL



version of your assessment for marking BEFORE the due date/time.



 Turnitin does not generate an automatic email receipt. If you have successfully uploaded



your assessment, a green bar will appear at the top of the screen that says: Submission



uploaded successfully: Download digital receipt. Use the hyperlink to download your digital



receipt and store this with your assignment file.



 If you have any difficulty submitting your assignment, please contact Technology Services



and make sure that you log a job with them, so you have evidence of your attempted



submission. To avoid any last-minute problems, make sure you submit well before 11:59pm



on the due date.



Academic Integrity



At Southern Cross University academic integrity means behaving with the values of honesty,



fairness, trustworthiness, courage, responsibility, and respect in relation to academic work.



The Southern Cross University Academic Integrity Framework aims to develop a holistic, systematic,



and consistent approach to addressing academic integrity across the entire University. For more



information see the SCU Academic Integrity Framework



NOTE: Academic Integrity breaches include poor referencing, not identifying direct quotations



correctly, close paraphrasing, plagiarism, recycling, misrepresentation, collusion, cheating, contract



cheating, fabricating information.



GenAI May Not be Used



Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools, such as ChatGPT, must NOT be used for this Assessment Task.



You are required to demonstrate if you have developed the unit’s skills and knowledge without the support of



GenAI. Grammarly (but NOT GrammarlyGo) may be used to review your task and make changes to grammar or



punctuation or to single words however it must NOT be used to re-write sentences or paragraphs.



Please note that GenAI tools include a range of translation tools. It is the responsibility of students to ensure



that any translation tool they are using is not a GenAI tool. Students are encouraged to write their work



without the support of translation tools for this reason.



If you use GenAI tools in your assessment task, it may result in an academic integrity breach against you as



described in the Student Academic and Non-Academic Misconduct Rules, Section 3.



Under the Rules - Student Academic and Non-Academic Misconduct Rules (Section 3) students have the right



to Appeal against the Academic Integrity Officers academic misconduct Determination, to the Executive



Dean, with that determination being final and conclusive, and not subject to further Appeal within the



University. Students are not able to appeal against academic misconduct via the Unit Assessor or unit staff.



Special Consideration



Please refer to the Special Consideration section of Policy



https://policies.scu.edu.au/document/view-current.php?id=140



Late Submissions & Penalties



5



Assessment Brief



Please refer to the Late Submission & Penalties section of Policy



https://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00255



Grades & Feedback



Assessments that have been submitted by the due date will receive an SCU grade. Grades and



feedback will be posted to the ‘Grades and Feedback’ section on the Blackboard unit site. Please



allow 7 days for marks to be posted.



Assessment Criteria



See the marking rubric for the marking criteria and grading standards.



… continued on next page….



6



Assessment Brief



Assessment Rubric



Marking



Criteria and %



allocation



High Distinction



+



100%



High Distinction



(85–99%)



Distinction



(75–84%)



Credit



(65–74%)



Pass



(50–64%) Marginal Fail



(35-49%)



Fail



(1-34%)



Not Addressed



(0%)



Criterion 1:



Part 1,



Analysis, and



evaluation of



positions put



forward in the



unit learning



and tutorials



on one issue



from Modules



4-6 is



supported with



reference to



the learning



materials and



recorded



tutorial/s. as



well as recent



scholarly



literature 15%



Achieves all the



criteria for a



high distinction



to an



exemplary



standard. Key



positions on a



chosen issue



from Modules



4-6 that were



presented in



the learning



materials and



recorded



tutorial/s are



analysed and



evaluated at an



exceptional



level with



exceptional



integration the



unit materials,



recorded



tutorials and



recent



scholarly



Key positions on



a chosen issue



from Modules 4-



6 that were



presented in the



learning



materials and



recorded



tutorial/s are



succinctly and



clearly analysed



and evaluated at



an outstanding



level with clear



integration of



the unit



materials,



recorded



tutorial/s and a



range of recent



scholarly



literature.



Key positions



on a chosen



issue from



Modules 4-6



that were



presented in



the learning



materials and



recorded



tutorial/s are



succinctly and



clearly



analysed and



evaluated at a



very good level



with clear



support from



the unit



materials,



recorded



tutorial/s and a



range of recent



scholarly



literature



Key positions



on a chosen



issue from



Modules 4-6



that were



presented in



the learning



materials and



recorded



tutorial/s are



succinctly



analysed and



evaluated at a



good level with



clear reference



to the unit



materials,



recorded



tutorial/s and a



range of recent



scholarly



literature



Key positions



on a chosen



issues from



Modules 4-6



that were



presented in



the learning



materials and



recorded



tutorial/s are



satisfactorily



analysed and



evaluated with



references to



some unit



materials,



recorded



tutorial/s and a



range of recent



scholarly



literature



evident



Key positions



on a chosen



issue from



Modules 4-6



that were



presented in



the learning



materials and



recorded



tutorial/s are



unclearly



analysed and



evaluated



and/or



discussed



rather than



analysed and



evaluated with



relevant



references to



the unit



materials



and/or



recorded



tutorial/s



and/or



Key positions



on an issue



from Modules



4-6 that were



presented in



the learning



materials and



recorded



tutorial/s is not



addressed



and/or the



analysis/



evaluation/



discussion



presented is



not relevant to



the positions



presented in



the learning



materials



and/or



tutorial/s



and/or the



references to



scholarly



literature



Not attempted



7



Assessment Brief



literature and



no errors.



reference to



scholarly



literature



and/or no



references to



the unit



materials



and/or



recorded



tutorial/s are



included in an



appropriate



analysis of an



issue from



Modules 4-6.



provided are



not relevant to



the learning in



the unit and/or



to the chosen



issue.



Criterion 2:



Part 2,



Reflection, and



personal



position on



one issue from



Modules 4-6 is



supported by



references to



the EYLF



(AGDE, 2022),



NQS (ACECQA,



2023) and 4



relevant and



current



Achieves all the



criteria a high



distinction,



with exemplary



discussion of a



personal



position on one



relevant issue



and support



drawn from



the integration



of a broad



range of



relevant and



current



scholarly



An outstanding



personal



position relevant



to an ECEC



professional on



one chosen



issue from



Modules 4 - 6 is



comprehensively



supported



through the



integration of a



range of



relevant and



current scholarly



literature and



A very good



personal



position



relevant to an



ECEC



professional on



one chosen



issue from



Modules 4 - 6



is clearly



supported



through the



integration of 4



or more



relevant and



current



A good



personal



position



relevant to an



ECEC



professional on



one chosen



issue from



Modules 4 - 6



is supported by



clear



references to 4



or more



relevant and



current



scholarly



A satisfactory



personal



position



relevant to an



ECEC



professional on



one chosen



issue from



Modules 4 - 6



is presented



with



references to 4



relevant and



current



scholarly



literature



A personal



position



relevant to an



ECEC



professional on



one chosen



issue from



Modules 4 - 6



is presented



without



references to



at least 2



relevant and



current



scholarly



literature



The personal



position



outlined does



not address an



issue from



Modules 4-6



and/or the



position



presented is



generic/not



personal



and/or



relevant to an



ECEC



professional



and/or the



Not attempted



8



Assessment Brief



scholarly



literature. 15%



literature and



no errors.



the EYLF (AGDE,



2022), NQS



(ACECQA, 2023).



scholarly



literature



sources as well



as the EYLF



(AGDE, 2022),



NQS (ACECQA,



2023).



literature



sources as well



as the EYLF



(AGDE, 2022),



NQS (ACECQA,



2023).



sources



including the



EYLF (AGDE,



2022), NQS



(ACECQA,



2023).



sources and/or



there is no



reference to



the EYLF



(AGDE, 2022),



NQS (ACECQA),



and/or the



personal



position only



generally



relates to one



issue from



Modules 4-6



and is



presented with



or without



references.



literature used



is not relevant



or is invalid.



Criterion 3:



Part 3,



Justification of



personal



position



supported by



references to



the EYLF



(AGDE, 2022),



NQS (ACECQA,



2023) and at



least 4 relevant



and current



scholarly



literature.



Achieves all the



criteria for a



high



distinction,



with



consistently



outstanding



integration of a



range of very



relevant and



current



scholarly



literature



sources and



unit learning



The justification



of the personal



positions is



excellently



linked to the



personal



position



presented and



reflects deep



engagement



with a range of



scholarly



literature with a



minimum of 4



relevant and



The



justification of



the personal



position is very



clearly linked



to the personal



position



presented and



reflects clear



engagement



with a range of



scholarly



literature with



a minimum of



4 relevant and



The



justification of



the personal



position is



clearly linked



to the personal



position



presented and



reflects good



engagement



with a range of



scholarly



literature. A



minimum of 4



relevant and



The



justification of



one personal



position is



satisfactorily



linked to the



personal



position



presented and



supported by



scholarly



literature. A



minimum of 4



relevant and



current



The



justification



presented is



only generally



linked to the



personal



position



presented



and/or a



minimum of 3



relevant and



current



scholarly



sources as well



as the EYLF



The



justification



presented is



not relevant to



the personal



positions



presented



and/or does



not include



references to



relevant



and/or valid



sources of



current



Not attempted.



9



Assessment Brief



15% materials/areas



with no errors.



current scholarly



sources as well



as the EYLF



(AGDE, 2022)



and NQS



(ACECQA, 2023)



integrated



within the



justification.



current



scholarly



sources as well



as the EYLF



(AGDE, 2022)



and NQS



(ACECQA,



2023)



integrated



within the



justification



current



scholarly



sources as well



as the EYLF



(AGDE, 2022)



and NQS



(ACECQA,



2023) provide



good support



to the



justification.



scholarly



sources as well



as the EYLF



(AGDE, 2022)



and NQS



(ACECQA,



2023) are



referenced



within the



justification.



(AGDE, 2022)



and NQS



(ACECQA,



2023) are not



referenced in



the



justification.



scholarly



literature.



Criterion 4:



Standard of



writing and



presentation –



spelling,



punctuation,



grammar,



paragraph



structure,



appropriate



word count,



APA 7th



referencing.



5%



Achieves all the



criteria for a



high distinction



to an



exemplary



standard,



without any



errors.



Excellent



standard of



writing and



presentation



with no errors in



spelling,



punctuation,



grammar,



paragraph



structure, or APA



7th referencing.



Word count



within +/- 10% of



the set word



count.



Very good



standard of



writing and



presentation



with very



minor and very



inconsistent



errors in



spelling and



punctuation



and grammar



and paragraph



structure and



APA 7th



referencing.



Word count



within +/- 10%



of the set word



count.



Good standard



of writing and



presentation



with some



minor and



inconsistent



errors in one or



two areas of



spelling or



punctuation or



grammar or



paragraph



structure, or



APA 7th



referencing.



Word count



within +/- 10%



of the set word



count.



Satisfactory



standard of



writing and



presentation



with errors in



most areas of -



spelling,



punctuation,



grammar,



paragraph



structure, APA



7th referencing



or consistent



errors in one or



two of the



above areas



and/or word



count



over/under +/-



Poor standard



of writing and



presentation



with consistent



errors in



most/all areas



of spelling,



punctuation,



grammar,



paragraph



structure, and



APA 7th



referencing



and/or word



count



significantly



under or over



+/- 10% of the



set word count



for the task



Significant



improvement



needed in



writing and



presentation



with consistent



errors in



spelling,



punctuation,



grammar,



paragraph



structure, and



APA 7th



referencing



Not attempted.



10



Assessment Brief



10% of the set



word count.



11



Assessment Brief



Description of SCU Grades



High Distinction:



The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and



applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows exceptional ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described as



outstanding in relation to the learning requirements specified.



Distinction:



The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and



applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows a well-developed ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described



as distinguished in relation to the learning requirements specified.



Credit:



The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements specified, demonstrates insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying



relevant skills and concepts. The student’s performance could be described as competent in relation to the learning requirements specified.



Pass:



The student’s performance satisfies all of the basic learning requirements specified and provides a sound basis for proceeding to higher-level studies in the subject area.



The student’s performance could be described as satisfactory in relation to the learning requirements specified.



Fail:



The student’s performance fails to satisfy the learning requirements specified.
Answered 9 days AfterApr 07, 2024

Answer To: 1Assessment BriefTCHR3001: Early Childhood MattersSummaryTitle Assessment 2Type Position paperDue...

Dipali answered on Apr 10 2024
3 Votes
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT        6
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT
Table of contents
Part 1: Analysis and Evaluation of Positions    3
.Part 2: Personal Reflection    5
Part 3: Justification with Scholarly Literature    7
References    9
Part 1: Analysis and Evaluation of Positions
In this section of the TCHR3001 Early Childhood Matters unit materials, I will look at and evaluate the points of view prese
nted in Modules 4 through 6. The primary objective is to understand different points of view on significant issues related to early childhood education and care, considering how these points of view may affect instructional strategies and how they align with the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF) and the National Quality Standard (NQS). These lessons primarily address the debate of play-based vs. structured learning approaches in early childhood education. Supporters of play-based learning assert that it fosters young children's creativity, social skills, and problem-solving ability. In order to promote holistic development, they emphasise the importance of experiential learning and kid-directed activities. Play-based learning practices are well associated with the guiding principles of the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYLF), which significantly emphasise children's agency and active engagement in their education.
Nonetheless, proponents of organised learning are in favour of more structured education, usually placing a strong focus on the improvement of academic readiness and numeracy and reading comprehension. According to their argument, structured learning environments provide children clear objectives and benchmarks to strive for, preparing them for success in the classroom down the road. However, opponents of planned learning caution against overburdening young children and stress the need of finding a balance between play-based learning and structured activities. Assessing these views necessitates considering the diverse needs and preferences of each child as well as the sociocultural context in which they are situated. Research indicates that children's development can gain from both play-based and structured learning strategies, depending on a number of factors such as age, developmental stage, and cultural context. Thus, the most effective approach to fulfilling the many needs of children in early childhood environments might be to use a well-rounded approach that blends elements of both play-based and structured learning.
Technology integration in early childhood education is an issue of great importance. With the increasing prevalence of digital devices and internet-based learning environments, educators need to figure out how to integrate technology into their teaching methods while still offering young learners stimulating experiences. Advocates of technology argue that it might spark children's curiosity, provide more customised education, and assist them in developing the digital literacy skills required for the twenty-first century. They encourage the thoughtful application of technology as a tool for collaboration, creativity, and exploration in early childhood settings. On the other hand, others express concerns over the potential risks and negative effects of extended screen time on children's health, happiness, and socialisation. The need of finding a balance between screen-based activities and immersive, interactive learning possibilities is emphasised. Additionally, research shows that the quality of interactions and scaffolding educators provide throughout the usage of technology is crucial to maximising its educational benefits while limiting any potential risks.
In summary, evaluating positions on important issues related to early childhood education and care highlights the complexity and variety...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here