2 Mini essays XXXXXXXXXXwords, each essay). Proper APA format, with citations. Essay #1: Question 1: What Is Art? What qualifies something to be counted as a work of art? Explain what you understand...

1 answer below »
2 Mini essays (350-700 words, each essay). Proper APA format, with citations.
Essay #1:








Question 1: What Is Art?

What qualifies something to be counted as a work of art? Explain what you understand Arthur Danto's theory of art to be saying in response to this question and compare and contrast what he says about art with Plato's conception of art asmimesis(copy, imitation, simulacrum).Be sure to give an account of what Danto means by "theisof artistic identification."
What is your own view about art? If you say that it is all a matter of subjective taste (that "art or beauty is in the eye of the beholder"), then what canbe saidaboutthe fact that some artworks are worth millions (or hundreds of millions) of dollars, displayed with utmost reverence in museums, galleries and other public venues, while others have little if any monetary value? Why should the opinions of art critics, art historians, philosophers of art, art collectors and art dealers, and even artists themselves matter more than the opinions of those of us who make up the public at large? Maybe you think that they should not matter more, but they do!


Essay #2:











Question 2: The God Question

Kierkegaard waged a mighty battle with his own will and conscience not just about the existence of God, but, more importantly, about having faith in the promise of Christianity--that God actually became Man in the form of Jesus Christ, who died for the sins of all men, in order to renew His promise of eternal salvation and everlasting life in God's paradise (heaven).
Wolff characterizes Kierkegaard's existential dilemma: "But just because I need so desperately to know that Jesus really lived, I am hopelessly at a loss for evidence or argument sufficient to my need. Can I rest comfortably in the belief that I have been promised eternal life when the evidence for my belief is merely probable, merely the sort of evidence that a historian or philosopher can produce? No, too much is at stake: Salvation is everything; it is eternity of life rather than death. I am reduced by my terror and my need to infinite concern for something that defies rational grounding. In short, I am reduced to an absoluteleap of faith" (p. 310).
Explain in your own words what you think Kierkegaard is trying to solve or establish here; specifically, explain what he means by saying thatone must make a "leap of faith" in order to truly realize the promise of Christianity. Be sure to discuss how Kierkegaard's approach to religious faith differs radically from that of his family and the society of his time, including his claim that faith is irrational and that "truth is subjectivity."



Answered Same DayDec 22, 2021

Answer To: 2 Mini essays XXXXXXXXXXwords, each essay). Proper APA format, with citations. Essay #1: Question 1:...

David answered on Dec 22 2021
121 Votes
What is Art?
Primarily a work of art is a composition or creation which possesses aesthetical value. An
object to be termed as a work of art must pivotally be subjective and should mean something
different to every single person who views it (Esaak, n.d.). In this respec
t the meaning of Arthur
Danto’s theory of art should be analyzed and discussed. Arthur’s Danto’s theory of art can be
termed as an institutional theory which denotes art as “artworld” which has been interpreted by
Danto as “an atmosphere of art theory”” (Adajian, 2012). As per my understanding Danto
defined a work of art to be something which has a subject projecting some specific attitudes or
perspectives in respect of style by means of symbolic contraction, and such symbolism draw the
attraction of audiences and enforces them to participate in filling the void within the concerned
creation, and moreover, the concerned something, to be termed as a work of art, should require
an art historical context for its interpretation (Adajian, 2012).
In respect of the definition of art the point of view of Plato must be mentioned as it is his
definition which has been contradicted by Danto. According to Plato any work of art is a nemesis
or a mirror. For Plato a work of art must be a representation of reality. But Danto has attacked
this theory of Plato and has criticized the theory, which he calls “Imitation Theory” or “IT”, by
stating that if Plato’s definition is to be admitted and accepted as the right definition of art then
any mirror image can also be called an artwork, but as a mirror image cannot be called an artistic
creation, Plato’s theory, according to Danto, is fallacious (“Arthur Danto, “The Artworld”, ABQ
Chapter 3, pp. 33-44”, n.d.). Danto has opined that an artwork must have a distinct identity and
this is the “IS” of artistic identification, “a method which one can use to tell the difference
between a real object and a piece of artwork” (Patterson, 2011). And it is through this concept of
“IS” that Danto has tried to refute the theory of nemesis conveyed by Plato.
Though there can be myriads of definition of art, in my view, art is both subjective and
objective. It is subjective because an artwork is a means by which the artist’s interpretation of a
particular subject can be revealed, an artist’s mood, feeling, dream, passion, and vision can be
revealed, and it is objective because an artwork sometimes tend to go beyond the creator and can
be seen, felt, heard, and dreamt by anyone who views it or comes in contact with it (“Objective
Art vs. Subjective Art”, 2006). If art would have only been subjective then each and every good
piece of art would have been appreciated in the same manner and...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here