A. Discuss the development of the Cold War in Europe from 1946 (after the war ends) to 1960, describing how three events from Europe illustrate the building tension between East and West. B. Next...

Last Name: 2
Name:
Professor:
Course:
Date:
Title: The Cold War
Contents
Introduction    3
A. Development of Cold War in Europe during 1946 to 1960    3
B. Development of Cold War in Asia    5
C. Important Difference    6
Conclusion    6
Works Cited    8
Introduction
The post-World War II phases shifted the attention of global powers towards shaping a new community. In fact, these phases are dominated by the inertia of the political governments in European and Asian regions in particular. The message was clearly given to the world that authority of rule was assigned to some centralized forces, the victors of the World War II and this ideology served as the foundation of the differences between the various forces (Anderson and Branch).
The onset of the cold war in the post-World War era (until 1960) contributed significantly in the development of the political interests of the European and Asian nations. The quick spread of self-promoted communism as well as the division of Germany and Roman treaties in Europe is the standpoints of this period.
A. Development of Cold War in Europe during 1946 to 1960
At first, it is significant to note here that the rise of cold war was due to the influential position gained by USSR in Europe in the aftermath of the World War II. The Russian political agenda was to control the economy and trade of the small nations that were in the process of recovery. However, the rich and developed nations like Italy and France could sense these ideologies of expanding boundaries and controlling the economy of a particular nation.
Thus, as per Troitino et al., they limited their hands at first and in the late 1946, they were listed as the powerful nations though, they were under the influence of communism to be seen in the political galleries of the nation. In other words, though Italy and Franc marked their strong presence in the context of confronting USSR policies, they still could not avoid the rapid growth of communism within their political structures and it ultimately became the source of difference between the Asian and European superpowers.
Secondly, Jakovljevic et al. stated that in spite of the fact that central and Eastern European nations were under the favor of USSR, the participation of American administration in this was something that encouraged tension between the East and the West. The American government expected to have so called improved state of relationship with USSR in the aftermath of the World War I but circumstances went in the opposite direction (Mastanduno). The relationship of these two central forces of World War II worsened and it became one of the prominent factors...