See attached
CYB 260 Module Two Activity Guidelines and Rubric Privacy Case Study CYB 260 Module Two Activity Guidelines and Rubric Privacy Case Study Overview A common skill for a cybersecurity analyst is the evaluation of current scholarly articles. Analyzing the findings within those articles develops skills that will help protect data. Evaluating privacy laws and regulations helps the analyst form baselines for policies within organizations. Choose one of the following articles to analyze for this assignment: Privacy, Notice, and Design This article discusses the approach to the design of privacy policies and discusses how they might not have been designed in a way that is consumable. The Surveillance Gap: The Harms of Extreme Privacy and Data Marginalization This article investigates the dangers of having too much privacy and existing in a surveillance gap. Privacy and Cybersecurity Lessons at the Intersection of the Internet of Things and Police Body-Worn Cameras This article looks at police body-worn cameras as internet of things (IoT) devices and explores the cybersecurity concerns of privacy for the public. Prompt After reading your selected article, address the following critical elements: I. Analyze the issues within the article related to privacy. II. Describe the regulations or laws within the article that play a role in the protection of privacy. III. Explain your opinions on the conclusion of the article. Consider these questions: Is the conclusion comprehensive? Do you agree with the conclusion? Are there areas that could be improved upon? 1 http://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/stantlr21&i=74 http://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/nyuls42&i=265 http://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/nclr96&i=1521 Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your submission should be 1 to 2 pages in length and should use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Use a file name that includes the course code, the assignment title, and your name—for example, CYB_100_Project_One_Neo_Anderson.docx. Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value Issues Analyzes the issues within the article related to privacy Addresses “Proficient” criteria, but there are gaps in clarity, logic, or detail Does not address critical element, or response is irrelevant 30 Protection of Privacy Describes the regulations or laws within the article that play a role in the protection of privacy Addresses “Proficient” criteria, but there are gaps in clarity, logic, or detail Does not address critical element, or response is irrelevant 30 Conclusion Explains opinions on the conclusion of the article Addresses “Proficient” criteria, but there are gaps in clarity, logic, or detail Does not address critical element, or response is irrelevant 30 Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to grammar, spelling, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy- to-read format Submission has some errors related to grammar, spelling, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to grammar, spelling, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Total 100% 2 CYB 260 Module Two Activity Guidelines and Rubric Privacy Case Study Overview Prompt Rubric DATE DOWNLOADED: Thu Apr 7 00:12:07 2022 SOURCE: Content Downloaded from HeinOnline Citations: Bluebook 21st ed. Ari Ezra Waldman, Privacy, Notice, and Design, 21 Stan. TECH. L. REV. 74 (2018). ALWD 7th ed. Ari Ezra Waldman, Privacy, Notice, and Design, 21 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 74 (2018). APA 7th ed. Waldman, A. (2018). Privacy, notice, and design. Stanford Technology Law Review, 21(1), 74-127. Chicago 17th ed. Ari Ezra Waldman, "Privacy, Notice, and Design," Stanford Technology Law Review 21, no. 1 (2018): 74-127 McGill Guide 9th ed. Ari Ezra Waldman, "Privacy, Notice, and Design" [2018] 21:1 Stan Tech L Rev 74. AGLC 4th ed. Ari Ezra Waldman, 'Privacy, Notice, and Design' [2018] 21(1) Stanford Technology Law Review 74 MLA 9th ed. Waldman, Ari Ezra. "Privacy, Notice, and Design." Stanford Technology Law Review, vol. 21, no. 1, 2018, pp. 74-127. HeinOnline. OSCOLA 4th ed. Ari Ezra Waldman, 'Privacy, Notice, and Design' (2018) 21 Stan Tech L Rev 74 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at https://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your license, please use: Copyright Information https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/stantlr21&collection=journals&id=74&startid=&endid=127 https://heinonline.org/HOL/License https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do?operation=go&searchType=0&lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=1098-4267 PRIVACY, NOTICE, AND DESIGN Ari Ezra Waldman' CITE As: 21 STAN. TECH. L. REV. 74 (2018) ABSTRACT Design configures our relationship with a space, whether offline or online. In particular, the design of built online environments can constrain our ability to understand and respond to websites' data use practices or it can enhance agency by giving us control over information. This Article is the first comprehensive theoretical and empirical approach to the design of privacy policies. Privacy policies today do not convey information in a way understandable to most internet users. This is because they are created without the needs of real people in mind. They are written by lawyers and for lawyers, and they ignore the way most of us make disclosure decisions online. They also ignore the effects of design, aesthetics, and presentation on