Question is attached

Null hypothesis, ho: there is no significant difference in the mean total calorie between various types of race
Alternative hypothesis, h1: at least one of the mean total calorie between various types of race differ significantly.
With F=0.748, p>5%, I fail to reject null hypothesis at 5% level of significance. Hence I can say that there is no significant difference in the mean total calorie between various types of race.
Null hypothesis, ho: there is no significant difference in the mean total calorie between men and women.
Alternative hypothesis, h1: there is a significant difference in the mean total calorie between men and women.
With t=0.04, p>5%, I fail to reject null hypothesis at 5% level of significance. Hence I can say that there is no significant difference in the mean total calorie between men and women.
Null hypothesis, ho: there is no significant difference in the mean age between drinker and non-drinker.
Alternative hypothesis, h1: there is a significant difference in the mean age between drinker and non-drinker.
With t=.269, p>5%, I fail to reject null hypothesis at 5% level of significance. Hence I can say that there is no significant difference in the mean age between drinker and non-drinker.
> #uploading data#
> x<-1
> library(readxl)
> data1<-read_excel(path="C:/Users/HP/Desktop/Book2.xlsx")
> summary(data1)
S. No sex smoke drink coffee tcal
Min. : 1 Min. :0.0000 Min. :0.0000 Min....