I need good tutor for this assignment thanks
ECON3009 INDUSTRIAL ORGANISATION S1 2022 1 / 3 ECON3009 S1 2022 RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT Due 2pm Friday May 13, 2022 Background: there is an ongoing electricity market monitoring inquiry by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). Task: write an article that could be pitched to The Conversation - examples are available on their website:https://theconversation.com/au Question: what are possible implications of a takeover of one of Australia's largest energy providers such as AGL? Details: Your writing should refer to issues discussed in ECON3009 including market concentration, price discrimination, price competition, or other topics. Equity issues are also important to consider. https://theconversation.com/carbon-pricing-works-the-largest-ever-study-puts-it-beyond-doubt-142034Question: https://theconversation.com/carbon-pricing-works-the-largest-ever-study-puts-it-beyond-doubt-142034Question: ECON3009 INDUSTRIAL ORGANISATION S1 2022 2 / 3 IMPORTANT INFORMATION: General Articles in The Conversation tend to be around 700-1,000 words. This is a good guide for this assignment. In contrast to articles in The Conversation, please include references instead of links. The assignment must be prepared using a word processing program (e.g. Microsoft Word). As detailed below, however, your final submission must be in PDF format. Any included figures should be prepared electronically (e.g. Microsoft Word drawing tool). The report will count towards 20% of your final mark. Referencing All sources used in the assignment should be appropriately referenced using a standard referencing system (e.g. Harvard style). Please consult Macquarie University Library’s resources for further information about referencing. There is no ideal number of references but around four to seven good references would provide a benchmark for an assignment of this length. Submission The assignment is due 2pm Friday May 13, 2022. You must submit through iLearn using the Turnitin link provided. Submission links will be open two weeks prior to the deadline. All submissions must be in PDF format. Turnitin often encounters problems with Microsoft Word files that include figures and/or tables. Failure to submit as a PDF file may result in a marker being unable to mark your submission. Late assessment submissions must be submitted through the appropriate submission link in iLearn. Please see the unit guide for details on late submissions and the Special Consideration Policy. The Macquarie Business School uses plagiarism detecting software (Turnitin) on all submissions. By submitting through Turnitin each student acknowledges the University’s policies relating to plagiarism and academic misconduct. Remember that you work should not include phrases/sentences which match other sources (unless direct quotations are used, and these should be rarely used, if at all). You are welcome (and encouraged) to work with other students to assist in developing your knowledge and ideas but ultimately the final submission must represent your own work. ECON3009 INDUSTRIAL ORGANISATION S1 2022 3 / 3 CHECKLIST: Document Preparation Checklist ☐ My assignment is typed using a word processor (e.g. MS Word). ☐ My assignment is written in full sentences and in clear language. ☐ My assignment is proofread and grammatical errors and typos are minimised. ☐ My assignment is approximately, 700-1,000 words plus references. ☐ Diagrams are not distorted. ☐ My assignment is saved as a PDF file of a size less than 40MB. After-Submission Checklist ☐ I have double-checked whether the assignment was properly uploaded. ☐ I have seen my originality report. ☐ I have received the Turnitin receipt via email. Marking The assignment is intended to primarily assess the Program Learning Outcome related to ‘Ethical Thinking’ but also relates to ‘Knowledge’ and ‘Communication’. Presentation, grammar, spelling and correct referencing practice will also be considered in marking. A marking rubric is provided on iLearn. Online help with assignments: https://students.mq.edu.au/support/study/skills-development/getting-help-with-your-assignment ECON3009 Research Assignment Marking Rubric Criteria Fail (F) Pass (P) Credit (Cr) Distinction (D) High Distinction (HD) Articulation of issues (20%) Economic and ethical issues are clearly stated and succinctly yet comprehensively explained as they relate to theories, concepts and definitions. Student does not provide any description of economic and ethical issues showing no understanding of the topic. Student poorly describes few economic and ethical issues demonstrating limited understanding of the topic. Student mostly effectively describes several economic and ethical issues demonstrating fair understanding of the topic. Student effectively describes multiple economic and ethical issues demonstrating deep understanding of the topic. Student effectively and creatively describes multiple economic and ethical issues demonstrating an extensive understanding of the topic. Analysis (20%) Issues are analysed using relevant and appropriate theories, concepts, and definitions. Analysis includes research studies or examples. Analysis takes into account diverse/competing perspectives. Student fails to demonstrate an analysis substantiating any of made claims through theories, concepts, definitions, research studies or examples. Student provides information and no analysis, ideas/solutions. Student ordinarily demonstrates an analysis, develop poor arguments, struggling to substantiate claims through few and/or irrelevant theories, concepts, definitions, research studies or examples. Student mostly provides information and limited analysis, ideas/solutions. Student accurately demonstrates an analysis; develops fair arguments but they lack substantiation through relevant theories, concepts, definitions, research studies and/or examples. Student accurately demonstrates an analysis; skilfully develops arguments, substantiating made claims through relevant theories, concepts, definitions, research studies and/or examples. Student accurately and insightfully demonstrates an analysis; masterfully develops arguments, substantiating made claims through relevant theories, concepts, definitions, research studies and/or examples. Position (20%) The analysis is interpreted, evaluated, integrated and/or synthesised to support and provide evidence for a clear overall position, demonstrating independent well-reasoned economic and ethical judgement. Student fails to support and provide evidence for a clear and independent position. There is no interpretation and integration of the analysis for an independent reasoned judgement. Student struggles to demonstrate a clear position and independent reasoned judgement. Student ordinarily provides an interpretation and integration of the analysis. Student accurately demonstrates a clear position and independent reasoned judgement. Student mostly effectively provides an interpretation and integration of the analysis. Student skilfully demonstrates a clear position and independent reasoned judgement. Student effectively provides an interpretation and integration of the analysis. Student skilfully and insightfully demonstrates a clear position and independent reasoned judgement. Student effectively and creatively provides an interpretation and integration of the analysis. Critique (20%) Assumptions, objections and implications of the position are identified, considered and appropriately defended. Student fails to identify assumptions, objections and implications for an independent position regarding the topic. Student struggles to identify assumptions, objections and implications for an independent position regarding the topic. Student accurately identifies assumptions, objections and implications for an independent position regarding the topic. Student skilfully identifies assumptions, objections and implications for an independent position regarding the topic. Student skilfully and insightfully identifies assumptions, objections and implications of an independent position regarding the topic. Organisation and evidence of research (20%) Clarity of structure, transitions between paragraphs, accuracy, academic tone, relevance, academic sources Text has no formal structure. Very poor text logic with frequent use of contradictions. Absence of academic tone due to consistent use of informal language. Referencing is non- Text has under-developed formal structure. Poor text logic with recurrent use of contradictions. Inappropriate academic tone due to frequent use of informal language. Referencing is mainly inaccurate Text has formal structure. Satisfactory text logic with some use of contradictions. Inconsistent academic tone due to use of informal language. Text has clear and well developed formal structure. Excellent text logic with miniscule use of contradictions. Appropriate academic tone. Text has clear and original formal structure. Outstanding text logic with no use of contradictions. Appropriate and confident academic tone. conforming to standard (e.g. Harvard) style and/or absent. Articles are from non-reputable sources and/or are irrelevant to and do not substantiate made claims. and/or does not conform to a standard (e.g. Harvard) style. Articles are often from non-scientific sources, irrelevant to arguments, do not help to substantiate made claims. Referencing is fairly accurate using standard (e.g. Harvard) style. Articles are mostly from reputable sources; are relevant to arguments and substantiate made claims. Referencing is mainly accurate using standard (e.g. Harvard) style. Articles are from reputable sources; are very relevant to arguments; thoughtfully substantiate made claims. Referencing is impeccably accurate using standard (e.g. Harvard) style. Articles are from highly reputable sources; are highly relevant to arguments; insightfully substantiate made claims.