i only need this part to be done, it's about the website of flipkart
a. Website
III. Software
IV. Security issues
V. Payments/Transaction process
Microsoft Word - ENSN - Assessment Brief 2 T3 2021.docx ASSESSMENT BRIEF COURSE: Bachelor of IT / Bachelor of Accounting / Bachelor of Business Unit Code: ENSN201 Unit Title: Enterprise Social Networks Type of Assessment: Group Assignment Length/Duration: 2000 Words & 15 minutes group presentation Unit Learning Outcomes addressed: Upon successful completion of this unit students should be able to: 1. Understand the core principles and concepts of information systems. 2. Describe business processes and how information systems can be used to improve those processes and contribute to business decision making. 3. Understand how information systems work, to a level where new material can be learned without requiring formal training. 4. Work effectively as part of a team in the production of a group report; understand and communicate effectively organizational and management information in a business context. Submission Date: Report: Week 10 Presentation: Week 11 Assessment Task: Group Report: Find a global case study which narrates the operations of e-commerce site (e.g. google play store), as detailed below in the Assessment Description. Group Oral Presentation: Working in a group of 4 students, you will give an oral presentation based on your Group report, as detailed below in the Assessment Description. Total Mark: Group Report: 100 marks Group Oral Presentation: 100 marks Weighting: Group Report: 20% Group Oral Presentation: 10% Total: 30 (20 for Report and 10 for Presentation) Students are advised that submission of an Assessment Task past the due date without a formally signed approved Assignment Extension Form (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> FORM – Assignment Extension Application Form – Student Login Required) or previously approved application for other extenuating circumstances impacting course of study, incurs a 5% penalty per calendar day, calculated by deduction from the total mark. For example. An Assessment Task marked out of 40 will incur a 2 mark penalty for each calendar day. More information, please refer to (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> POLICY – Assessment Policy & Procedures – Student Login Required) ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION: This is a group assignment. Students are required to form a group of 4 (Four) students chosen among them and submit the group names to the lecturer by week 4. A. Group Report: You are required to find a global case study which narrates the operations of e-commerce site i.e., Flip-Kart. Get the approval from your lecturer for your selected case study. Write a report of 2000 words following the below sections with evidence: a. Introduction b. Organization Overview c. Business Model d. Website I. Website contents II. Hardware Infrastructure III. Software IV. Security issues V. Payments/Transaction process e. Discussion/Recommendations f. Conclusion g. Individual Contribution (one page summary of each member’s tasks and deliverables) h. Reference i. Appendix B. Presentation: Working with the same group members, you will give an oral presentation. If you are absent from the class at your presentation time, you will get zero for this assessment, unless you have a medical certificate or other extenuating circumstances. Please talk to your tutor before the due date. There will be 4 speakers, 8-10 slides and an allocated 15 minutes to present. Use PowerPoint to create the presentation. Save it on a USB so you are ready to present in class. As this is a group assignment, 50% of the grade will be moderated by peer assessment. Every team member individually must assess their contribution and the contribution of other team members. Please complete Self and Peer Evaluation form (see Appendix A) and submit a copy to your lecturer on the day of presentation. Academic Learning Skills staff will give a workshop in class about Oral Presentations, which will be very helpful for this assessment. ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION: 1. Group Report This is a group activity and students are required to work with their respective group members. No individual submission will be accepted. You will not receive any marks for this assignment if your group members collectively report against you for non-participation or non-cooperation. You have to nominate someone as your group leader to coordinate the assignment submission. The report will be submitted online in Moodle by one member of the team ONLY on Sunday Week 10. You have to nominate someone as your group leader to coordinate the assignment submission. 2. Group Oral Presentation This assessment is a group activity and students are required to work with their respective groups. No individual submission will be accepted. You will not receive any marks for this assignment if your group members collectively report against you for non-participation or non-cooperation. GENERAL NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT TASKS Content for Assessment Task papers should incorporate a formal introduction, main points and conclusion. Appropriate academic writing and referencing are inevitable academic skills that you must develop and demonstrate in work being presented for assessment. The content of high quality work presented by a student must be fully referenced within-text citations and a Reference List at the end. Kent strongly recommends you refer to the Academic Learning Support Workshop materials available on the Kent Learning Management System (Moodle). For details please click the link http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606 and download the file titled “Harvard Referencing Workbook”. This Moodle Site is the location for Workbooks and information that are presented to Kent Students in the ALS Workshops conducted at the beginning of each Trimester. Kent recommends a minimum of FIVE (5) references in work being presented for assessment. Unless otherwise specifically instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed in the Unit Outline for the specific Assessment Task, any paper with less than five (5) references may be deemed not meeting a satisfactory standard and possibly be failed. Content in Assessment tasks that includes sources that are not properly referenced according to the “Harvard Referencing Workbook” will be penalised. Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count if this is specifically stated for the Assessment Task in the Unit Outline. As a general rule there is an allowable discretionary variance to the word count in that it is generally accepted that a student may go over or under by 10% than the stated length. GENERAL NOTES FOR REFERENCING References are assessed for their quality. Students should draw on quality academic sources, such as books, chapters from edited books, journals etc. The textbook for the Unit of study can be used as a reference, but not the Lecturer Notes. The Assessor will want to see evidence that a student is capable of conducting their own research. Also, in order to help Assessors determine a student’s understanding of the work they cite, all in-text references (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page number(s) if shown in the original. Before preparing your Assessment Task or own contribution, please review this ‘YouTube’ video (Avoiding Plagiarism through Referencing) by clicking on the following link: link: http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606 A search for peer-reviewed journal articles may also assist students. These type of journal articles can be located in the online journal databases and can be accessed from the Kent Library homepage. Wikipedia, online dictionaries and online encyclopaedias are acceptable as a starting point to gain knowledge about a topic, but should not be over-used – these should constitute no more than 10% of your total list of references/sources. Additional information and literature can be used where these are produced by legitimate sources, such as government departments, research institutes such as the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), or international organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO). Legitimate organisations and government departments produce peer reviewed reports and articles and are therefore very useful and mostly very current. The content of the following link explains why it is not acceptable to use non-peer reviewed websites (Why can't I just Google?): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N39mnu1Pkgw (thank you to La Trobe University for access to this video). Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd. Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458 Version 2: 8th November, 2021 Page 1 of 6