I would like to know how much it Cost to get help with this assessment?
I also wanted to note that the reflective response I can do myself once you have finished and I would prefer the gender topic.
Assessment details for all students Annotated Bibliography LNGE40049 Submission: Due date: Upload through Moodle Friday, Week 9, 11:45pm ASSESSMENT Weighting: 30% 2 Length: Annotated Bibliography: 900 words (±10%) Please note: Do not include the references or the source type in your word count – only the search strategies and evaluations. Reflective Response (100-200 words, word- processed) Details There are two items that form the submission of this assessment task. These are: A 4-item Annotated Bibliography (900 words – see above) with a complete reference list A reflective response (100-200 words) The Annotated Bibliography (Assessment 2) is designed to assist you in completing the Research Essay (Assessment 3). In Assessment 2 you will prepare an Annotated Bibliography of four (4) different types of resources that could be useful for your Research Essay. The four resources you locate and evaluate in this assessment, the Annotated Bibliography, will form the foundation of the 6-10 resources required to write your Research Essay. For Assessment 2 and Assessment 3, you may choose one of the following topics: EITHER A) The modern Australian lifestyle has created some problems for the natural environment. Discuss two of these problems and the ways they are being addressed. OR B) Since the 1960s, gender roles within Australian society have undergone many significant changes. Discuss two of these changes, and their positive and negative impacts. OR C) This century, the increasing use of mobile technologies and social media platforms has impacted on Australian society in a number of ways. Discuss two of these technologies/platforms, and their positive and negative impacts. The STEPS foundation unit, Preparation Skills for University (PSU), covers information literacy skills. You need to apply this knowledge to undertake your research for the Annotated Bibliography and the Research Essay. If you have completed PSU in a previous term and you feel that your skills need refreshing, you can find a PDF copy of the CQU Information literacy guide on the EWU Moodle site. Your Study Guide (Week 8) also clearly explains how to undertake the Annotated Bibliography so please ensure you have worked through this part of your guide carefully before attempting this assessment. To be successful with Assessment 2 follow these steps. 1. Complete Writing Workshop Activities 7–1, 7–2 and 7–3 in the Study Guide. These activities are not submitted with Assessment 3; however, by completing these activities, you will now have two issues to research, based on your chosen essay topic. 2. Locate four (4) different types of resources related to your essay topic. Your resources must include: Two (2) journal articles – at least one of which must be from a peer- reviewed journal. One (1) government document/statistical information One (1) of the following: book (hardcopy or e-book), book chapter, audio-visual resource, newspaper article. 3. Using the Annotated Bibliography template provided on Moodle, for each of your four resources you must: Supply a citation (correctly structured and formatted using Harvard conventions). Outline your search strategies (refer to the Information literacy guide on Moodle, and your Study Guide, Week 8 for guidance). Write approximately 4-6 sentences evaluating the resource’s usefulness. (For help with writing an evaluation, refer to the Information literacy guide on Moodle, and your Study Guide, Week 8). Your evaluation must address these four principles: 1. relevance to your topic 2. authority/trustworthiness 3. objectivity 4. currency of information 4. Construct a reference list for your four resources, using Harvard referencing conventions. 5. Write a response reflecting on the process of preparing and submitting Assessment 2. In the reflective response you must respond to the following five questions: How did you feel as you began preparing the assessment? What do you think you have done well in this assessment? What do you think you will need to improve on in future assessments? What were the most challenging parts of the assessment? What are the most important lessons you have learned from completing this assessment? 6. Upload all parts of Assessment 2 as ONE Word document through the Essay Writing for University Moodle site. Objectives This assessment item relates to course learning outcomes 4, 5, 7 and 8 and to the general assessment criteria detail that follows. find and evaluate relevant, scholarly research to support academic writing record citation details according to Harvard referencing conventions develop competence in the use of the online learning management system reflect on new ideas and their relationship to personal worldviews and academic learning Assessment criteria You will be assessed according to how well you demonstrate control over the following criteria. Evaluation: ability to evaluate the relevance of each resource to the topic ability to evaluate the authority and trustworthiness of each resource ability to evaluate the objectivity of each resource ability to evaluate the currency of the information in each resource. Referencing: ability to use Harvard referencing conventions to compile the Annotated Bibliography. Reflective response responses to reflection criteria quality and detail of reflection Student name: Assessment 2: Annotated Bibliography Criteria for assessment Level of achievement demonstrated High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail Resource evaluation: Ability to evaluate relevance, authority, objectivity and currency of resources for use with chosen topic. Evaluation of resources is comprehensive, highly effective and addresses all four aspects needed to ensure usefulness for academic purposes. Evaluation of resources is effective and addresses all four aspects needed to ensure usefulness for academic purposes. Evaluation of resources is somewhat effective and addresses most of the aspects needed to ensure usefulness for academic purposes. Evaluation of resources is adequate and addresses some aspects needed to ensure usefulness for academic purposes. Evaluation of resources is poor and addresses few, if any, of the aspects needed to ensure usefulness for academic purposes. Search strategies: Ability to detail the search strategies used to locate resources. Detail of search strategies shows a thorough, methodical approach and a sophisticated application of search strategies covered in the Information Literacy Guide. Detail of search strategies shows a methodical approach and a considered application of search strategies covered in the Information Literacy Guide. Detail of search strategies shows a somewhat methodical approach and some application of search strategies outlined in the Information Literacy Guide. Detail of search strategies is limited, and shows little application of search strategies outlined in the Information Literacy Guide. Detail of search strategies is scant, with no application of search strategies outlined in the Information Literacy Guide. Referencing: Demonstrated skill in using Harvard referencing conventions. The bibliographic citations are 100% accurate according to Harvard conventions. The bibliographic citations are close to accurate according to Harvard conventions (1 or 2 similar errors appear). The bibliographic citations are mostly accurate according to Harvard conventions (3 similar errors appear). The bibliographic citations attempt to follow Harvard conventions but contain errors (4 to 5 similar errors appear). The bibliographic citations do not sufficiently adhere to Harvard conventions. Criteria for assessment Level of competence demonstrated High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail Language use: Control over sentence structure, grammar, punctuation and spelling Sentences are well controlled. There are few, if any, errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Sentences are mostly well controlled. There are few errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Lapses in control of sentence structure are evident. There may be some errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. There are problems with sentence structure and a number of errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. There are serious problems with sentence structure and a distracting number of errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. Reflective response: Ability to respond to prompt questions and provide a detailed written response that demonstrates self- awareness regarding completed assessment. Reflection follows prompt questions, and demonstrates an excellent level of self- awareness regarding the assessment. Reflection follows prompt questions and demonstrates a high level of self-awareness regarding the assessment. Reflection generally follows prompt questions and demonstrates a satisfactory level of self- awareness regarding the assessment. Reflection does not adequately follow prompt questions and demonstrates a low level of self-awareness regarding the assessment. Reflection does not respond to prompt questions OR Reflection is not submitted. Overall achievement: Grade highlighted below is your overall achievement for this assessment. Please note: Lack of adherence to the word limit (10% over or under) can result in your grade being reduced. High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail Comments: