Include an ASA style Reference page after completing 2 of those pages. Must use source on the file for evidence. Have a rubric for this analysis reflection essay below. Don't need a title. Must be a full page each.
Sociology Assignment: Analysis & Reflection Essays Locating Social Inequality & Our Lives in Social History Please use these Analysis and Reflection Questions to guide your reading and class discussions, your group presentation in class, as well as for your written Analysis and Reflection Essays. Please select two (2) essays to write, with a minimum of 1 page per question (2 questions = 2 essays = 2 pages). Remember to use an appropriate academic essay format including introductions, clearly articulated arguments, transitions, and conclusions. Please number each essay with the appropriate question number. Please use ASA style to cite your sources within the text and provide a list of references at the end of your assignment. 1. Discuss the interrelationship between law & policy with the interests of the economic elites in each of the following stages: A. The great depression and the beginning of the Welfare State (1929-1945); B. The period of Economic Expansion and Welfare State Reform (1945-1970’s); C. Globalization in the Electronic Age, Neoliberalism, and end of the Welfare State (1980’s-today). 2. What forces gave rise to the weakening and breaking of the social safety net/Social Contract in the period from the 1980s to the present? What do we call this new period? 3. What is new about today’s globalization with regard to the technology of production, communication, and distribution? How does this impact our lives in each of the following aspects: D. the political economy of wages and the market system: E. culture, ideology and the media: F. politics and structures of social control and domination. https://csus.instructure.com/courses/101537/pages/citation-resources?module_item_id=4997250 Analysis & Reflection Essay Rubric-2 Essay Rubric Fabulous Excellent Good Inadequate Argument Argument is presented clearly and logically. Logical points build directly upon the thesis and prior points. Argument is presented clearly and logically, but points do not necessarily build on each other. Argument is rambling, and there are contradictions left unaddressed. There is no discernible argument. Evidence Each logical point is backed up by more than one example. Evidence is strong and sufficient to advance the argument. Evidence is used throughout the paper to support each claim and the larger thesis. Each logical point is backed up by one or more examples. Evidence advances the argument, but it may not be sufficient. Uses evidence in parts to support ideas OR relies heavily on one source. Not always connected to larger thesis. Several points of the argument are left without evidence. Evidence is insufficient. OR Overview of sources/quotes with no analysis of the examples/quotes. A few pieces of evidence are thrown in here or there, but not used to defend the main argument. Readings Demonstrates solid understanding of the major themes of the course, using readings and lectures to define concepts. Argument is placed within the broad discussions outlined in the course. All Demonstrates understanding of most of the major themes of the course, using readings and lectures to define concepts. Argument is placed within some discussions outlined in the course. All Demonstrates understanding of some of the major themes of the course, using readings OR lectures to define concepts. Argument is not placed within discussions outlined in the course. Most Demonstrates little understanding of the major themes of the course. Readings and lectures are not used to define concepts. Argument is not placed within discussions outlined in the relevant readings are clearly used to support the essay. relevant readings are used to support the essay. relevant readings are used to support the essay. course. Relevant readings are not adequately used to support the essay. Organizat ion Clear organization with a natural flow. Includes an introduction, transition sentences to connect major ideas, and conclusion. There are few or no grammar or spelling errors. Minimal passive voice. Ideas and evidence are correctly cited. Each separate essay is numbered, clearly addressing every part of the essay question. Clear organization with introduction, transitions and conclusion, but writing is not always fluid. There are several grammar or spelling errors. Ideas and evidence are correctly cited. Essays address every part of the essay question. Organization is unclear or without necessary component parts. Significant grammar or spelling errors (but not both). Ideas & evidence are correctly cited. Essays address every part of the essay question but not in adequate depth. Or only some aspects of the essay question are addressed, but those aspects are addressed in depth. Little discernible organization. Significant grammar and spelling errors. Ideas and evidence are not correctly cited, or not cited at all. Essays do not address every part of the essay question, and answers are not in depth. Sociology Assignment: Analysis & Reflection Essays Analysis & Reflection Essay Rubric-2