Learning Objectives BRIEFING COURT CASES At the end of this assignment, you will be able to: •Brief a court case •Understand the significance of facts •Appreciate how subtle changes in facts can make...

1 answer below »

Learning Objectives


BRIEFING COURT CASES


At the end of this assignment, you will be able to:
•Brief a court case
•Understand the significance of facts
•Appreciate how subtle changes in facts can make a huge difference in the outcome of a legal


proceeding


Assignment




  • Read theReadingfor P5(Sample Brief) posted on Canvas.




  • Read “Common Errors in Tax Research” in the Resources onCanvas.




  • Prepare and submit case briefsaccording to the instructions below.


    Instructions


    Tax researchers have found that the preparation of a case brief—a concise summary of relevant court case—is an invaluable tool, both when returning to a client’s research problem or whenconstructing a research analysis for another client with a similar problem. You may work on this assignment in pairs.


    •Below are six pairs of court cases preceded by a group of letters.Select the cases that correspond with the first letter of your last name.(You may use the letter for either partner if you are working in pairs.) The cases citations below may or may not be in the correct form. Be sure to look at the Citation Forms document.




•Obtain the case opinions (use RIA). Write aone-page brief (no more than 1 1⁄2 pages) for each caseand aone-page contrast of the two cases. (A sample brief is posted in the P5 folder.)You will turn in one Word document with each case 1 on the first page, case 2 on the second page and the contrast on the third page.In comparing the cases, notice how a subtle difference in the facts can completely alter the outcome.The comparison should focus on the differencesin the cases. The contrast should be written as a narrative rather than a numbered or bulleted list.


•Please submit the assignment (Case 1, Case 2 and Contrast) as asingleWord document attachment to Assignments by 10:00 p.m. on the due date (refer to the syllabus for the due date.)If you are working in pairs, the team should turn in only one document with the names of both team members included.


•Put your name in the header of your paper in this format: Last name—P5—A302 (or A551)—spring 2021




  1. (I-M) William T. Heywood, TC Memo 1994-575, and Donald C. Kimbrough, TC Memo (1988-185)



Answered Same DayApr 02, 2021

Answer To: Learning Objectives BRIEFING COURT CASES At the end of this assignment, you will be able to: •Brief...

Riddhi answered on Apr 03 2021
139 Votes
Case law – William. T. Heywood TC Memo 1994-575
Citation –
U.S. Tax Court, Docket Nos. 20886-92, 14142-93; TC Memo 1994-575, 68 TCM 1240; Filed on November 22, 1994; 1994 Tax Ct.
Memo Lexis 581, Decision entered before Scott Judge.     
Facts –
Petitioner Husband and wife resided in Santa Monica, California, and had been filing federal tax returns on timely basis. Regarding taxable years 1989 to 1991, the petitioners deducted business expenses payment related to income from activities of playing Golf. Respondent issued notice for deficiency in payment of taxes by claiming excess loss regarding activities from playing Golf.
Issues –
Petitioner husband earned income in the form of interest from bank and wife earned income as legal secretary. In any of the years, the income earned is from the activities of playing tournament as a golfer or even qualified for the tournament. Playing Golf for just an activity for passion or leisure and petitioner had never had any clients nor any leads generated for prospective clients. All the expenses for playing golf were paid by the petitioner from the income earned as interest and the income of wife as legal secretary. The Petitioner claimed this expense as business loss and the respondent has issued notice for deficiency in payment of taxes by claiming losses not allowable.
Holding -
The Contention of the respondent was that since the activities of playing golf was pursuing passion and not business activity based on the case law of Lemmen V commission, losses in such regard cannot be claimed. The objective of playing golf was not to make profit as there has been no clients nor the petitioner has played tournament nor has been exceptionally well in such activity in accordance with Sec183 and Sec162. Moreover, the bills for...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here