Business Data Analysis MIS771 - Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation Trimester 1, 2019 Page 1 of 10 MIS771 Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation Assignment Two Background This is an individual...

1 answer below »
MIS771 Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation


Business Data Analysis MIS771 - Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation Trimester 1, 2019 Page 1 of 10 MIS771 Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation Assignment Two Background This is an individual assignment, which requires you to analyse a given data set, interpret and draw conclusions from your analysis, and then convey your conclusions in a written technical report to an expert in Business Analytics. Percentage of final grade 35% The Due Date and Time 11.59 PM Sunday 12th May 2019 (AEST) Submission instructions The assignment must be submitted by the due date electronically in CloudDeakin. When submitting electronically, you must check that you have submitted the work correctly by following the instructions provided in CloudDeakin. Please note that we will NOT accept any paper or email copies, or part of the assignment submitted after the deadline. No extensions will be considered unless a written request is submitted and negotiated with the unit chair before Thursday 9th May 2019, 5:00 PM. Please note that assignment extensions will only be considered if you attach your draft assignment with your request for an extension. You must keep a backup copy of every assignment you submit (that is, the work you have done to date) until the assignment has been marked. In the unlikely event that an assignment is misplaced, you will need to submit your backup copy. Work you submit will be checked by electronic or other means to detect collusion and/or plagiarism. When you submit an assignment through your CloudDeakin unit site, you will receive an email to your Deakin email address confirming that the assignment has been submitted. You should check that you can see your assignment in the Submissions view of the Assignment Dropbox folder after upload, and check for, and keep, the email receipt for the submission. MIS771 - Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation Trimester 1, 2019 Page 2 of 10 Penalties for late submission: The following marking penalties will apply if you submit an assessment task after the due date without an approved extension: 5% will be deducted from available marks for each day up to five days, and work that is submitted more than five days after the due date will not be marked. You will receive 0% for the task. 'Day' means calendar days or part thereof. The Unit Chair may refuse to accept a late submission where it is unreasonable or impracticable to assess the task after the due date. For more information about academic misconduct, special consideration, extensions, and assessment feedback, please refer to the document Your rights and responsibilities as a student in this Unit in the first folder next to the Unit Guide of the Resources area in the CloudDeakin unit site. The assignment uses the file mdcb.xlsx, which can be downloaded from CloudDeakin. Analysis of the data requires the use of techniques studied in Module 2. Assurance of Learning This assignment assesses following Graduate Learning Outcomes and related Unit Learning Outcomes: Graduate Learning Outcome (GLO) Unit Learning Outcome (ULO) GLO1: Discipline-specific knowledge and capabilities - appropriate to the level of study related to a discipline or profession. GLO3: Digital Literacy - Using technologies to find, use and disseminate information GLO5: Problem Solving - creating solutions to authentic (real-world and ill-defined) problems. ULO 1: Apply quantitative reasoning skills to solve complex problems. ULO 2: Use contemporary data analysis and visualisation tools and recognise the limitation of such tools. Feedback before submission You can seek assistance from the teaching staff to ascertain whether the assignment conforms to submission guidelines. Feedback after submission An overall mark together with suggested solutions will be released via CloudDeakin, usually within 15 working days. You are expected to refer and compare your answers to the suggested solutions to understand any areas of improvement. MIS771 - Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation Trimester 1, 2019 Page 3 of 10 Case Study (Background to Mad Dog Craft Beer) Mad Dog Craft Beer, is an Australian micro-brewery company with less than fifteen years of experience in brewing ale. Despite its limited operations in Melbourne and regional Victoria, the company has experienced fast growth in its production and sales in the past couple of years. In 2018, the company reported increasing its brewing capacity to 3 million litres per year to meet the increasing demand of its pale ale beer. Mad Dog Craft Beer sells pale ale to two market segments: a) pubs, bars and restaurants and b) bottleshops. Their beer is sold to these market segments either directly to the buyer or indirectly through a sales representative. Despite their successful operations and solid financial turnovers in the last two years, Mad Dog Craft Beer is forecasting a shift in business climate within the next five years. This is a result of the ever-increasing popularity of craft beer among Victorians and emergence of micro-brewery culture in this region. Now more than ever, Mad Dog Craft Beer management feels the need to ensure a strong relationship with its customer base. In addition, they are planning to put in place a formal procedure to forecast their beer production. This would help Mad Dog Craft Beer accurately project future supply and demand and adjust production needs accordingly. Subsequently, Mad Dog Craft Beer has approached BEAUTIFUL-DATA (a market research company) and asked them to conduct a large-scale survey of their clients to better understand the characteristics of Mad Dog Craft Beer’s customers, and their repurchase intention. Data Collection Process (Conducted by BEAUTIFUL-DATA) To address Mad Dog Craft Beer’s concerns, BEAUTIFUL-DATA has contacted Mad Dog Craft Beer’s clients and encouraged them to participate in an online survey. The collected data are then supplemented by other information compiled and stored in Mad Dog Craft Beer’s datamarts and accessible through its decision support system (DSS). Primary Database (accessible via mdcb.xlsx file) The primary database consists of 200 observations. There are three types of information in this database. The first group of information comes from Mad Dog Craft Beer’s data warehouse and includes information about the customer such loyalty in years, type, region, and distribution channel. The second group of information relates to the customers’ perceptions of Mad Dog Craft Beer on nine attributes. Mad Dog Craft Beer’s customers were asked to rate the company on nine attributes using a 1 – 10 scale. The third group of information relates to quantity ordered and business relationships (e.g., number of bottles bought from Mad Dog Craft Beer; and the likelihood of recommending Mad Dog Craft Beer to others). A complete listing of variables, their definitions, and an explanation of their coding are provided in mdcb.xlsx file. MIS771 - Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation Trimester 1, 2019 Page 4 of 10 Your Role as a BEAUTIFUL-DATA Data Analyst Intern You are a graduate student doing an internship at BEAUTIFUL-DATA. The research team manager (Todd Nash, with a PhD in Data Science and a Master Degree in Digital Marketing) has asked you to lead the data analysis process for the Mad Dog Craft Beer project and directly report the results to him. You and Todd just finished a meeting wherein he briefed you on the primary purpose of the project. Todd explained that a model should be built to estimate Order Quantity. Therefore, the first goal is to identify critical factors that influence the quantity ordered. Todd is also interested in gaining more profound insights into factors that predict the likelihood of current clients to recommend Mad Dog Craft Beer’s products to others. The final goal is to construct a model which forecast Mad Dog Craft Beer’s Pale Ale production in the upcoming four quarters. From these insights, Mad Dog Craft Beer will be in an excellent position to develop plans for the next financial year. Todd also allocated relevant research tasks and explained his expectations from your analysis in the meeting. Minutes of this meeting are available on the next page. Now, your job is to review and complete the allocated tasks as per this document. MIS771 - Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation Trimester 1, 2019 Page 5 of 10 BEAUTIFUL-DATA, 727 Collins St, Docklands VIC 3008 Phone: (+61 3 212 66 000) [email protected] Reference PH-102 Mad Dog Craft Beer Project Revised April 12, 2019 Level Expert Analysis Meeting Chair Todd Nash Date 12 April 2019 Time 11:00 AM Location BEAUTIFUL-DATA F3.101 Topic Mad Dog Craft Beer Project – Analytics Details Meeting Purpose: Specifying and Allocating Data Analytics Tasks Discussion items: • Variable(s) description. • Modelling Quantity Ordered. • Modelling the likelihood of recommending Mad Dog Craft Beer to others. • Forecasting Pale Ale production in the upcoming four quarters. • Producing a technical report. Detailed Action Items Who: Graduate Intern What: 1. Provide an overall summary of the following two variables: 1.1. Order_Qty 1.2. Recommend 2. Identifying potential factors that may influence Order_ Qty: 2.1. An appropriate statistical technique could be used here to identify a list of possible factors. 2.2. Build a model (through a model building process) to estimate the Order_ Qty. 2.3. Todd has done a separate regression analysis and found that the perception of beer quality is a significant predictor of the quantity ordered. In line with his findings, prior research shows that the strength of this relationship may vary according to brand image. That is, customers tend to associate the brand image with product quality. Therefore, Todd believes that the relationship between quality and quantity ordered should be stronger for those who have a more favourable perception of a brand. Your task here is to test Todd’s assumption by modelling the interaction between the predictors mentioned above and the target variable. Comment whether there is sufficient evidence that the interaction term makes a significant contribution to the model. MIS771 - Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation Trimester 1, 2019 Page 6 of 10 3. Finalise the model to predict
Answered Same DayMay 02, 2021MIS771Deakin University

Answer To: Business Data Analysis MIS771 - Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation Trimester 1, 2019 Page 1 of...

Pooja answered on May 05 2021
137 Votes
Table of Contents
Introduction    2
Analysis    3
Task 1    3
Task 2    3
Task 2.1    3
Task 2.2    4
Task 2.3    6
Task 3    7
Task 3.1    7
Task 3.2    8
Task 3.3    10
Task 4    10
Conclusion    12
References    14
Introduction
The dependent variable is quantity ordered and recommendation. The independent variables are Loyalty, Customer Type, Region, Distribution Channel, Quality, SM Presence, Advert, and Brand Image, comp Pricing, Order Fulfilment, Flex Price, Shipping Speed, Shipping Cost, Order Quantity, and Recommend. The technique of descriptive statistics is used to analyse the order quantity and recommendation. The technique of correlation analysis can be helpful to identify the factors which affect the order quantity. A regression equation is constructed to predict the quantity ordered on the basis of identified factors. A logistic regression equation is created to predict the probability of recommendation.
The dependent variable Pale Ale production (litres) is predicted for 2nd quarter 2019, 3rd quarter 2019, 4th quarter 2019, and 1st quarter 2020. The technique of regression analysis is used for prediction.
Analysis
Task 1
The average number of bottles ordered by the customer is 7665 with a low standard deviation of 0.89 units. The distribution of bottles order by the customer is approximately normally distributed as skewness is equal to -0.2.
    Order_Qty
    
    
    Mean
    7.665
    Standard Error
    0.063161
    Median
    7.6
    Mode
    7.2
    Standard Deviation
    0.893233
    Sample Variance
    0.797864
    Kurtosis
    0.584038
    Skewness
    -0.20635
    Range
    5.6
    Minimum
    4.3
    Maximum
    9.9
    Sum
    1533
    Count
    200
    Row Labels
    Count of Recommend
    0
    99
    1
    101
    Grand T
otal
    200
There is not much difference in the proportion of customers who recommend Mad Dog Craft Beer (as a supplier) to others. There are 101 customers who would recommend Mad Dog Craft Beer (as a supplier) to others from a sample of 200 customers.
Task 2
Task 2.1
The technique of correlation analysis can be helpful to identify the factors which affect the order quantity. The correlation matrix is given below.
     
    Loyalty
    Quality
    SM_Presence
    Advert
    Brand_Image
    Comp_Pricing
    Order_Fulfillment
    Flex_Price
    Shipping_Speed
    Shipping_Cost
    Order_Qty
    Loyalty
    1
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Quality
    0.084
    1.000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    SM_Presence
    0.190
    -0.034
    1.000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Advert
    0.259
    -0.054
    0.505
    1.000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Brand_Image
    0.258
    -0.116
    0.788
    0.627
    1.000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Comp_Pricing
    0.076
    -0.448
    0.177
    0.099
    0.200
    1.000
    
    
    
    
    
    Order_Fulfillment
    0.139
    0.083
    0.217
    0.230
    0.284
    -0.060
    1.000
    
    
    
    
    Flex_Price
    0.058
    -0.487
    0.186
    0.260
    0.272
    0.470
    0.419
    1.000
    
    
    
    Shipping_Speed
    0.196
    0.067
    0.241
    0.323
    0.299
    -0.055
    0.773
    0.513
    1.000
    
    
    Shipping_Cost
    0.175
    0.141
    0.215
    0.247
    0.296
    -0.094
    0.696
    0.358
    0.840
    1.000
    
    Order_Qty
    0.405
    0.433
    0.235
    0.237
    0.338
    -0.218
    0.315
    -0.003
    0.425
    0.504
    1
Consider the cut-off value as |r|>0.4. I expect a moderate positive linear relationship for order quantity with loyalty, quality, shipping speed, and shipping cost. Schroeder, L.D., Sjoquist, D.L. and Stephan, P.E., 2016. 
The scatterplot for order quantity with each independent variable is given below.
I include variables loyalty, quality, shipping speed, and shipping cost as they have a moderate linear relationship with order quantity. This is evident from the scatterplots above. Scatterplot for these variables shown an upward trend with points moderately close to each other.
But there is problem of multi-co-linearity as shipping speed, and shipping cost have a strong positive linear relationship between them. I decide to include shipping cost for the regression analysis as it has stronger linear relationship with order quantity in comparison to shipping speed.
Task 2.2
The regression equation for predicting the order quantity on the basis of Quality, Shipping Cost, and Loyalty is: order quantity = 3.7039 + 0.22676 * quality + 0.3019*shipping cost + 0.06562 * loyalty
The coefficient of determination is 0.478. There is 47.8% variation in order quantity which is explained by Quality, Shipping Cost, and Loyalty. This model is not a good fit for the data as the percentage is less than 70%.
Null hypothesis, model is not significant. Alternative hypothesis, model is significant. With F=59.95, p<5%, the null hypothesis is rejected at 5% level of significance. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the model is significant. Schroeder, L.D., Sjoquist, D.L. and Stephan, P.E., 2016. 
The null hypothesis, the coefficient of Xi (independent variable) is not significant, beta_i = 0. Versus the alternative hypothesis, the coefficient of Xi (independent variable) is significant, beta_i =/= 0. With p-value < 5%, the null hypothesis is rejected at 5% level of significance. There is sufficient evidence to prove that the position of independent variables quality, shipping cost, and loyalty are significant at 5% level of significance.
I am 95% confident that estimated value of coefficient for quality, shipping cost, and loyalty lie in the interval (0.160279, 0.29325), (0.22359, 0.38), and (0.04339, 0.0878) respectively.
Model diagnosis
The assumption of normality is satisfied as the PP plot is S shaped. There is equality of error variances as points are randomly distributed in the residual plot. There is no problem of multi-co-linearity in the data as value of |r| is less than the cut off 0.8.
Task 2.3
The interaction term is created for quality and brand image. The dependent variable is the order quantity. The independent variables considered are quality, brand image, and the interaction between quality and brand image.
The regression equation is given by order quantity = 0.50108 + 0.6911* quality + 0.8643* brand image - 0.0685*Quality*Brand_image
The coefficient of determination is 35%. There is 35% variation in order quantity which is explained by quality, brand image, and the interaction between quality and brand image. This is a bad fit for the data.
The null hypothesis, the coefficient of Xi (independent variable) is not significant, beta_i = 0. Versus the alternative hypothesis, the coefficient of Xi (independent variable) is significant, beta_i =/= 0. With p-value < 5%, the null hypothesis is rejected at 5% level of significance. There is sufficient evidence to prove that the position of independent variables quality, brand image, and the interaction between quality and brand image are significant at 5% level of significance.
The two lines in the interaction plot intersect each other. Hence I can say that interaction between quality and brand image are significant.
With 1 unit increase in quality, the order quantity of beers is increased by 501 bottles. With 1 unit increase in brand image, the order quantity of beers is increased by 691 bottles. When the brand image is increased by 1 level of positivity along with the increase in quality by one Level, the quantity order is decreased by 68 bottles.
Task 3
Task 3.1
The dependent variable is recommended. The independent variables are quality, brand image, shipping speed, and distance travel. I want to predict the probability of recommendation on the basis of quality, brand image, shipping speed, and distance travel.
The method of GRG nonlinear solver is used to obtain the parameters of intercept and 4 coefficients of the independent variable. The value of 14 parameters and maximizing the likelihood is given below.
    b0
    b1
    b2
    b3
    b4
    L
    -13.278
    0.654
    0.621
    1.159
    0.968
    -95.377
The regression equation is given by: P = exp(-13.278 + 0.654*Quality + 0.621*Brand Image + 1.159*Shipping Speed + 0.968*Distance channel) / (1+exp(-13.278 + 0.654*Quality + 0.621*Brand Image + 1.159*Shipping Speed + 0.968*Distance channel))
With 1 unit increase in the quality, the likelihood of recommendation is increased by 0.654. With one unit increase in brand image, the probability of recommendation is increased by 0.621. With one Level increment in the shipping speed, the probability of recommendation is increased by 1.159. For the direct distribution channel, the probability of recommendation is 0.968 units more in comparison to the distribution channel through a sales representative. Fox, J., 2015. 
Task 3.2
For the possible values of quality ranging from 1 to 10, brand image levels as 1, 5, 10, shipping speed as neutral with value of 5, and 2 types of distance channel (0 = Through a Sales Representative; 1 = Directly) the predicted probability of recommendation is given below.
The prediction for recommendation is calculated with the help of logistic regression equation: P = exp(-13.278 + 0.654*Quality + 0.621*Brand Image + 1.159*Shipping Speed + 0.968*Distance channel) / (1+exp(-13.278 + 0.654*Quality + 0.621*Brand Image + 1.159*Shipping Speed + 0.968*Distance channel)).
The various considered values of independent variables quality, brand image, shipping speed, and distance channel and their corresponding predicted probability of recommendation is given below.
    Quality
    Brand_Image
    Shipping_Speed
    Dist_Channel
    Recommend_predicted_probability
    1
    1
    5
    1
    0.005272
    2
    1
    5
    1
    0.010091
    3
    1
    5
    1
    0.019227
    4
    1
    5
    1
    0.036334
    5
    1
    5
    1
    0.067610
    6
    1
    5
    1
    0.122389
    7
    1
    5
    1
    0.211485
    8
    1
    5
    1
    0.340290
    9
    1
    5
    1
    0.498000
    10
    1
    5
    1
    0.656109
    1
    5
    5
    1
    0.059749
    2
    5
    5
    1
    0.108903
    3
    5
    5
    1
    0.190310
    4
    5
    5
    1
    0.311310
    5
    5
    5
    1
    0.465057
    6
    5
    5
    1
    0.625744
    7
    5
    5
    1
    0.762783
    8
    5
    5
    1
    0.860806
    9
    5
    5
    1
    0.922442
    10
    5
    5
    1
    0.958113
    1
    10
    5
    1
    0.586375
    2
    10
    5
    1
    0.731648
    3
    10
    5
    1
    0.839835
    4
    10
    5
    1
    0.909784
    5
    10
    5
    1
    0.950968
    6
    10
    5
    1
    0.973891
    7
    10
    5
    1
    0.986252
    8
    10
    5
    1
    0.992804
    9
    10
    5
    1
    0.996245
    10
    10
    5
    1
    0.998044
    1
    1
    5
    0
    0.002009
    2
    1
    5
    0
    0.003857
    3
    1
    5
    0
    0.007392
    4
    1
    5
    0
    0.014119
    5
    1
    5
    0
    0.026805
    6
    1
    5
    0
    0.050307
    7
    1
    5
    0
    0.092457
    8
    1
    5
    0
    0.163830
    9
    1
    5
    0
    0.273686
    10
    1
    5
    0
    0.420188
    1
    5
    5
    0
    0.023568
    2
    5
    5
    0
    0.044362
    3
    5
    5
    0
    0.081961
    4
    5
    5
    0
    0.146540
    5
    5
    5
    0
    0.248244
    6
    5
    5
    0
    0.388410
    7
    5
    5
    0
    0.549834
    8
    5
    5
    0
    0.701406
    9
    5
    5
    0
    0.818765
    10
    5
    5
    0
    0.896785
    1
    10
    5
    0
    0.350009
    2
    10
    5
    0
    0.508749
    3
    10
    5
    0
    0.665744
    4
    10
    5
    0
    0.792983
    5
    10
    5
    0
    0.880482
    6
    10
    5
    0
    0.934073
    7
    10
    5
    0
    0.964600
    8
    10
    5
    0
    0.981275
    9
    10
    5
    0
    0.990175
    10
    10
    5
    0
    0.994867
Task 3.3
The plot of probabilities predicted for the available data is given below.
The probability lie in the range from 0 to 1.
The regression equation is given by: P = exp(-13.278 + 0.654*Quality + 0.621*Brand Image + 1.159*Shipping Speed + 0.968*Distance channel) / (1+exp(-13.278 + 0.654*Quality + 0.621*Brand Image + 1.159*Shipping Speed + 0.968*Distance channel))
With 1 unit increase in the quality, the likelihood of recommendation is increased by 0.654. With one unit increase in brand image, the probability of recommendation is increased by 0.621. With one Level increment in the shipping speed, the probability of recommendation is increased by 1.159. For the direct distribution channel, the probability of recommendation is 0.968 units more in comparison to the distribution channel through a sales representative. Chatterjee, S. and Hadi, A.S., 2015. 
Task 4
The regression output for predicting Pale Ale production (litres) on the basis of time (t) corresponding value of 1 with 3rd quarter of 2009.
The regression equation is given by Pale Ale production (litres) = 1111.39 + 16.39*t
For the given time the predicted value of Pale Ale production (litres) is summarized in the table below.
    year
    quarter
    t
    predicted pale ale (litres)
    2019
    Q2
    44
    1832.597747
    2019
    Q3
    45
    1848.988824
    2019
    Q4
    46
    1865.379901
    2020
    Q1
    47
    1881.770977
Conclusion
The average number of bottles ordered by the customer is 7665 with a low standard deviation of 0.89 units. There is not much difference in the proportion of customers who recommend Mad Dog Craft Beer (as a supplier) to others.
I expect a moderate positive linear relationship for order quantity with loyalty, quality, shipping speed, and shipping cost.
The regression equation is given by bye order quantity = 4.3091+ 0.1754892* quality -0.0727shipping speed + 0.28* shipping cost + 0.061* loyalty + 0.438* recommended. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the model is significant. There is sufficient evidence to prove that the position of independent variables quality, shipping speed for my shipping cost from Novelty, and peppermint are significant at 5% level of significance.
The regression equation is given by order quantity = 0.50108 + 0.6911* quality + 0.8643* brand image - 0.0685*Quality*Brand_image. When the brand image is increased by 1 level of positivity along with the increase in quality by one Level, the quantity order is decreased by 68 bottles.
The regression equation is given by: P = exp(-13.278 + 0.654*Quality + 0.621*Brand Image + 1.159*Shipping Speed + 0.968*Distance channel) / (1+exp(-13.278 + 0.654*Quality + 0.621*Brand Image + 1.159*Shipping Speed + 0.968*Distance channel)). With 1 unit increase in the quality, the likelihood of recommendation is increased by 0.654. With one unit increase in brand image, the probability of recommendation is increased by 0.621. With one Level increment in the shipping speed, the probability of recommendation is increased by 1.159. For the direct distribution channel, the probability of recommendation is 0.968 units more in comparison to the distribution channel through a sales representative.
The regression equation is given by Pale Ale production (litres) = 1111.39 + 16.39*t. the predicted Pale Ale production for 2nd quarter 2019, 3rd quarter 2019, 4th quarter 2019, and 1st quarter 2020 is 1832.59, 1848.98, 1865.37, and 1881.77 respectively.
References
Chatterjee, S. and Hadi, A.S., 2015. Regression analysis by example. John Wiley & Sons.
Draper, N.R. and Smith, H., 2014. Applied regression analysis(Vol. 326). John Wiley & Sons.
Fox, J., 2015. Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. Sage Publications.
Schroeder, L.D., Sjoquist, D.L. and Stephan, P.E., 2016. Understanding regression analysis: An introductory guide (Vol. 57). Sage Publications
Appendix
Task 2.2
    SUMMARY OUTPUT
    
    
    Regression Statistics
    Multiple R
    0.722861
    R Square
    0.522528
    Adjusted R Square
    0.510222
    Standard Error
    0.625121
    Observations
    200
    ANOVA
    
    
    
    
    
     
    df
    SS
    MS
    F
    Significance F
    Regression
    5
    82.96445
    16.59289
    42.46138
    2.02E-29
    Residual
    194
    75.81055
    0.390776
    
    
    Total
    199
    158.775
     
     
     
    
    Coefficients
    Standard Error
    t Stat
    P-value
    Lower 95%
    Upper 95%
    Lower 95.0%
    Upper 95.0%
    Intercept
    4.309159
    0.364355
    11.82683
    1.18E-24
    3.590555
    5.027764
    3.590555
    5.027764
    Quality
    0.175489
    0.03483
    5.038511
    1.07E-06
    0.106796
    0.244183
    0.106796
    0.244183
    Shipping_Speed
    -0.07279
    0.112097
    -0.64933
    0.516896
    -0.29387
    0.148298
    -0.29387
    0.148298
    Shipping_Cost
    0.281479
    0.069614
    4.043402
    7.6E-05
    0.144181
    0.418778
    0.144181
    0.418778
    Loyalty
    0.061506
    0.010935
    5.624941
    6.41E-08
    0.03994
    0.083072
    0.03994
    0.083072
    Recommend
    0.438802
    0.103864
    4.224798
    3.68E-05
    0.233956
    0.643649
    0.233956
    0.643649
Task 2.3
    SUMMARY OUTPUT
    
    
    Regression Statistics
    Multiple R
    0.595757
    R Square
    0.354926
    Adjusted R Square
    0.345052
    Standard Error
    0.722883
    Observations
    200
    ANOVA
    
    
    
    
    
     
    df
    SS
    MS
    F
    Significance F
    Regression
    3
    56.35338
    18.78446
    35.94704
    1.48E-18
    Residual
    196
    102.4216
    0.522559
    
    
    Total
    199
    158.775
     
     
     
     
    Coefficients
    Standard Error
    t Stat
    P-value
    Lower 95%
    Upper 95%
    Lower 95.0%
    Upper 95.0%
    Intercept
    0.501087
    1.53677
    0.326065
    0.744723
    -2.52964
    3.531814
    -2.52964
    3.531814
    Quality
    0.691114
    0.187122
    3.69338
    0.000287
    0.322082
    1.060146
    0.322082
    1.060146
    Brand_Image
    0.864327
    0.269459
    3.207644
    0.001563
    0.332917
    1.395737
    0.332917
    1.395737
    Quality*Brand_image
    -0.06856
    0.032934
    -2.08163
    0.038675
    -0.1335
    -0.00361
    -0.1335
    -0.00361
Task...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here