ord count / Assessment time.1,900 words / by 12 NoonBrief IV completed byMiemie Neethling TaylorLearning OutcomesThis assessment covers the following learning outcomes:1. Critically analyze...

WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT
Table of contents
Why some people become terrorists    3
One man’s terrorist is another one’s freedom fighter    3
Kaldor’s ’New War’ thesis    4
Powerful actors motivate and contribute to perpetual war    5
Minority Armenian population    6
How Ruggiero applied criminological theories of ’common’ violence to the analysis of political violence    7
References    8
Why some people become terrorists
Various motivations and explanations for why people could go to terrorism have also arisen with the rise of various forms of terrorism and various types of terrorists. What drives someone to become a terrorist and why these people choose to violence and terrorism as a type of critical thinking are topics of discussion among scholars today. Psychology, religion, and sociopolitical issues might impact someone's decision to become a terrorist; however, they don't completely make sense of why someone could choose to take part in terrorism. Different elements like bias, retribution, and destitution might set someone on the way to being a terrorist. Terrorist organizations are heterogeneous groups with members from various backgrounds, as Walzer, (2019) featured, and as a result, the process by which they join could change. People have various reasons for getting things done, thus it will be easiest to understand why certain people become terrorists by focusing on a specific nation or area. A terrorist's motivations may not always be the same whether they are from Palestine or Nigeria. It is trying to distinguish the "universal" drivers behind those who are considering joining terrorist organizations, just as it is trying to characterize what constitutes terrorism. Despite the fact that we live in a period where religious impulses give off an impression of being the vital main thrust behind terrorism, the question of whether it is for sure religion or politics ostensibly dressed up as religion continues to be discussed. Eventually, there is nobody street to terrorism, despite the fact that there are similar variables. In any case, because these factors consolidate and cooperate, it is really difficult to distinguish between them while considering a single person.
One man’s terrorist is another one’s freedom fighter
In our universe, there are some concepts or behaviors that are difficult to discuss or categorize. The dangerous school of reasoning that commonly comes before the activity is the reason for this. The meaning of terrorism in the present culture suits this situation rather well. There are essential components that are specific to terrorism, which raises the inquiry: Is one man's terrorist another man's freedom fighter? Discussing some of the basic factors that make characterize terrorism testing, such as the Just War Theory, the possibility of terrorism, and the reasoning of freedom struggle goes further in addressing this. The just war theory is a school of imagined that regulates or directs global struggle (Van sanctum Bos, 2018). As indicated by the conviction, battles must be pursued for a worthwhile motivation instead of just to increase one's money and influence. Understanding warfare and the capability of contentious politics is significant while separating acts of fear from freedom-battling. There are occasions when the methods and strategies used in battle and terrorism are indistinguishable. As per Walzer, the distinction between terrorism and war is the evasion of direct struggle with the opponent. Based on how this distinction is seen, a terrorist assault may be classified as a roundabout type of warfare. This raises concerns about whether military operations are always immediate and, if not, whether those specific operations may also be viewed as acts of terrorism. Thus, it follows that in some circumstances, terrorism is traditional since it serves the needs of the tactical strategy or the political command. A sense of patriotism and self-preservation arises when one imagines a freedom warrior or someone who has battled for freedom. One might contend that the Just cause hypothesis is supported by freedom struggles. While this might be somewhat precise, the opposing side who believes that they did nothing out of sorts is placed in a situation of frenzy (Levinson, 2022). Subsequently, it is reasonable to accept that insight and setting, which exist on the two sides of the wall, are the essential differences between freedom battling, warfare, and terrorism. As was at that point said, it also entails actions like assaulting non-combatants and causing needless harm to infrastructure. The Just Cause Theory, in any case, is...