please give me a call for details

1 answer below »
please give me a call for details

FINAL ESSAY ENT 308 Essay max 1,500 words plus references. Due 30 September mid night Worth 40% total includes essay, and participation in the class discussion at the end of September/early Oct. Look at the videos listed. They are also on the Moodle site. The first video is a famous Australia popular song from the 1980’s Down Under The second video is a children’s novelty song from the 1930’s called Kookaburra Sits on the Old Gum Tree. Can you see any similarity between the two songs? In the first video go to the part 50 seconds into the video where a man playing a flute is ‘sitting in an old gum tree’ listen to that part of the song in particular. Can you hear a similarity to the children’s song? The owners of the children’s song successfully sued the song writers of the Men at Work 1980’s song for millions of dollars. Why did they win that court case? Compared to why did Ed Sheeran win his case? Can you see the vague nature of IP law? Make a comment about what you think. Write an individual essay. Find a group find one or two other students to discuss your thoughts in class at the end of September.
Answered 3 days AfterSep 21, 2023

Answer To: please give me a call for details

Dipali answered on Sep 23 2023
29 Votes
Table of contents
Introduction    3
Discussion    3
Similarities Between "Down Under" and "Kookaburra Sits on the Old Gum Tree"    3
The Copyright Infringement Lawsuit    4
Ed Sheeran's Case    5
The Vagueness of IP Law    5
The vague nature of IP law can be attributed to several factors    7
Conclusion    8
References    9
Title: "Nav
igating the Harmonious and Dissonant Realms of Intellectual Property: A Comparative Analysis of Music Copyright Cases"
    When analyzing the intricate and sometimes confusing nature of intellectual property (IP) law as exemplified by the instances of "Down Under" and "Kookaburra Sits on the Old Gum Tree," it is evident that finding a balance between preserving innovation and avoiding excessive limitations is a difficult challenge. Due to the subjectivity and changing standards in IP law highlighted by these judgments, it is crucial for legal systems to change to reflect shifting cultural norms and technology progress. Additionally, the different results in the "Down Under" case and Ed Sheeran's case highlight how each IP issue is distinct and how decisions are impacted by a variety of variables, including expert testimony and economic concerns. It is crucial for entrepreneurs and innovation students to comprehend the complexities of IP legislation. It stresses the value of creativity and innovation while simultaneously warning against unintended plagiarism. These instances serve as a reminder of the difficulties that inventors, entrepreneurs, and artists may have while navigating the complex world of intellectual property rights in a world where creativity feeds on inspiration from a variety of sources. By participating in these conversations, we get a greater comprehension of how to safeguard and uphold intellectual property in our own business endeavors.
Similarities Between "Down Under" and "Kookaburra Sits on the Old Gum Tree"
The parallels between Men at Work's "Down Under" and "Kookaburra Sits on the Old Gum Tree" are mostly based on one particular melodic passage from "Down Under." The melody of "Kookaburra Sits on the Old Gum Tree" may be heard in the flute riff that appears about 50 seconds into the song. Both songs have a memorable melody, and the section of "Down Under" in question sounds strikingly similar to the theme song from "Kookaburra Sits on the Old Gum Tree." When you listen to both songs back-to-back, you'll notice how similar the melodic rhythm and phrasing are, which makes you feel as though you've heard it before. The complaint for copyright infringement was centred on this startling resemblance. It was said that "Down Udder’s composers drew inspiration from the children's song and used its tune in their own song. This striking likeness in one particular musical passage was a crucial element in the proprietors of "Kookaburra Sits on the Old Gum Tree's" successful legal appeal."
The Copyright Infringement Lawsuit
The proprietors of “Kookaburra Sits on the Old Gum Tree” for copyright infringement sued the songwriters of “Down Under,” Men at Work. Millions of dollars in damages were given to them. Their success in the court fight was largely due to a number of important considerations:
· Substantial Similarity: Determining whether there is a substantial resemblance between the original work and the claimed infringing work is crucial in copyright law. In this instance, there is no denying that the flute riff from "Down Under" resembles the tune from "Kookaburra Sits on the Old Gum Tree." Because of how similar they were, there were good reasons to be concerned...

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here