same tutor of order
100344as this assignment is part of the report in order
1003441 Unit BSBMGT3003 Managing Change Assessment Type Group Assessment Assessment Number A3 Assessment Name Group Presentation Weighting 20% Alignment with Unit and Course Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO 1: Demonstrate understanding of the concept and process of change management ULO 2: Examine ethical issues in leading organisational change ULO 3: Evaluate approaches to change management ULO 4: Develop and communicate a change management plan Graduate Attributes: GA 1: Communication GA 2: Collaboration GA 3: Research GA 4: Critical Thinking GA 6: Flexibility GA 5: Flexibility Due Date and Time Session 9, 10, 11, 12 in class during scheduled workshop time Assessment Description Your Group Presentation A3 will represent the key points and insights that your group has secured in A2 (2500words Group Report) that has been submitted in week 10. Students will remain in the same group they have formed for Assessment 2 (group report) and work together to prepare and make a presentation in class. Research Expectation Detailed Submission Requirements • The submission needs to be supported with information by credible sources. • Credible sources should be varied and include, but not limited to, the Textbook, Government reports, Industry reports, Newspaper articles, Books, and Journal articles. • Use the EBSCO Databases accessed through the Library and Learning Support page on Moodle to find journal articles, case studies and more to help you prepare your assessment. Speak with the library assistants or email (
[email protected]) if you require further assistance One member of the group who is nominated by the other members must submit a copy of the presentation through the Assessment 3 Turnitin link on Moodle page for this unit. • The presentation should be prepared using Ms PowerPoint and supported with relevant visual aids. • Each group is allowed 15 minutes to make the presentation. 2 • An additional 5 minutes will be allowed for discussion and questions by the lecturer and other students. • They will prepare approximately 12 to 15 slides and will upload on Moodle. • All group members should participate in presentation. • References should be provided to support the points made during the presentation. • Use Harvard referencing including the reference list • All students must submit the peer evaluation via relevant Moodle link before the assessment due date Misconduct Late Submission The AIH misconduct policy and procedure can be read on the AIH website (https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/). • Any assessment submitted past the specific due date and time will be classified as Late. • Any Late submission will be subject to a reduction of the mark allocated for the assessment item by 5% per day (or part thereof) of the total marks available for the assessment item. A ‘day’ for this purpose is defined as any day of the week including weekends. Assignments submitted later than one (1) week after the due date will not be accepted, unless special consideration is approved as per the formal process. Special consideration • Students whose ability to submit or attend an assessment item is affected by sickness, misadventure or other circumstances beyond their control, may be eligible for special consideration. No consideration is given when the condition or event is unrelated to the student's performance in a component of the assessment, or when it is considered not to be serious. • Students applying for special consideration must submit the form within 3 days of the due date of the assessment item or exam. • The form can be obtained from the AIH website (https://aih.nsw.edu.au/current-students/student-forms/) or on-campus at Reception. • The request form must be submitted to Student Services. Supporting evidence should be attached. For further information please refer to the Student Assessment Policy and associated Procedure available on (https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/). https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/ https://aih.nsw.edu.au/current-students/student-forms/ https://aih.nsw.edu.au/about-us/policies-procedures/ MGT3003 Managing Change Assessment – Group Presentation 20%- Grading Rubric Criteria H D D C P F Introduction and Executive summary (5 marks) Detailed overview of organization/prod ucts and assignment flow. Presents background data & information succinctly. (4.25 – 5 marks) Good overview of organization/products and assignment flow. Presents background data & information. (3.75 – _4marks) General description of organization and assignment provided, but some relevant background information missing. (3-3.25marks) Some description of organization and assignment, but no background provided. (2.5-3marks) Provide little or no relevant information regarding organization or assignment. (0 – _2marks Concep Discusses the Clear discussion on Good discussion Limited Very little clarity or ts and main concept of change reasons and change reasons and discussion on depth about Change change forces forces and change change forces. forces management. Clearly identifies with good insights. Covers concepts concepts. reasons and forces. and discusses important change reasons and forces. Ethics and Excellent Good identification Fair identification Identification Change model for Change identification of of change model of change model and application the change action Manageme change model and correct and application in of change plan is missing nt and accurate application in the the change action model in the Strategies application in the change change action plan. Good plan with few missing logics. change action plan is visible action plan. identification of Covers ethical with many Excellent ethical issues. isses. missing identification of information ethical issues. Change Excellent development of the change communication strategy Good development of Fair development of Limited No proper Communic ation the change communication the change communication knowledge of the change communication plan for the change Strategy (5 strategy strategy communication management marks) strategy process has been identified. ( Conclusion & Referencing 5marks Clear and concise summary & evaluation of the project including thoughtful (4.25-5 marks) Evaluates and summarizes the project, offering useful insights assessment of solutions. 3.75 – _4marks) Evaluates and summarizes the project. Some useful insights and suggestions provided. 3-3.25marks) Simple summary of the project. No further insights or suggested (2.5- 3marks) Little or no conclusions provided. No attempt to evaluate solutions. (0 – _2marks) Using proper formatting and referencing guide 5 Formatting and Harvard referencing is accurate and complete. Presentation starts and concludes in a planned manner. There iss opportunity to interact and ask questions. (4.25-5 marks) Formatting and Harvard referencing is accurate and complete. Presentation has a good start and conclusion with opportunity to interact. (3.75 – _4marks) Formatting and Harvard referencing is satisfactory. The presentation has satisfactory opening and closing with limited opportunity to interact. (3-3.25marks) Formatting and Harvard referencing is followed with minor errors The presentation has week introduction and conclusion with limited or little opportunity to interact. (2.5-3marks) Formatting and No references have been provided. The opening and closing is not specific and the presentation is not interactive. (0 – _2marks insights and suggestions for improvement and limitations with proper evaluation of change solutions Excellent report format and accurate academic referencing (8.5– 10 marks) Very Good report format and accurate academic referencing (7.5 -8.25 marks) Good report format and accurate academic referencing (6.5-7.25 marks) improvements or limitations provided. Report format and academic referencing has few errors with few incomplete parts (5-6.25 marks) Compliant report format and accurate academic referencing is missing (0-4.75 marks)