Scenario You are the audit engagement partner at A Ltd, a small firm of public accountants. You were recently appointed as auditor to a local company named B Ltd. The previous auditors, Z & Co, had...

2. What fundamental ethical principles for accountants are most applicable and is there an apparent conflict between them?Scenario<br>You are the audit engagement partner at A Ltd, a small<br>firm of public accountants. You were recently appointed<br>as auditor to a local company named B Ltd. The<br>previous auditors, Z & Co, had resigned due to having<br>so few audit clients that it was no longer commercially<br>viable for the firm to retain its registered public<br>accounting firm<br>opportunity for your firm to take on the client and you<br>and your fellow<br>audit client in what was proving to be a difficult business<br>environment. Times were<br>well aware that redundancies were not out of the<br>status. This had provided the<br>v partners were delighted to be gaining an<br>inly tough and you were<br>question if more work was not picked up quickly. You<br>had met Mr X, B Ltd.'s Managing Director (MD), at<br>various local events and had a good personal<br>relationship<br>good reputation in<br>was involved a<br>You believed that this was a good client to win and, with<br>Mr X's considerable business connections, this might<br>not be the only audit client that you would pick up in the<br>coming months. Mr X had assured you that a good<br>working pack ( Audit Fee) would be prepared by his<br>newly installed finance director (FD) to support the<br>figures in the draft financial statements. Additionally, the<br>client would arrange for<br>was not picked up<br>with him, Mr X was someone with a very<br>community and<br>of charitable fundraising activities.<br>the local business<br>final publication<br>accounts.<br>Six months down the line, you are sitting at your desk<br>reviewing the audit working papers of B Ltd. As you had<br>imagined, the fieldwork had been done within budget<br>and the files appeared to show that, as Mr X had earlier<br>company had maintained a good set of<br>records and produced appropriate documentation to<br>support the draft figures. Some minor errors had been<br>of unadjusted errors,<br>significance, and you had all but<br>watch, another<br>20 minutes would see you complete your task – the<br>client was now keen to sign off in seven days' time,<br>three weeks earlier than had originally been envisaged.<br>This had just allowed you time to review the files in<br>advance of a meeting with Mr X and his FD later that<br>week to discuss any major issues prior to signing.<br>advised, the<br>noted and added<br>the summary ofr<br>but nothing of<br>finished<br>any<br>your review. You looked at VOUE M<br>You continued with the task at hand and opened the<br>creditors section of the file and reviewed the lead<br>schedule. Everything this year appeared in line with that<br>of the previous year. There were no major variations<br>and, to be honest, you had not expected any. There<br>was, however, a note from the audit senior stating that a<br>large accrual had been included for taxes – and indeed<br>an accrual of $163,937 was included<br>the accounts.<br>This<br>appeared<br>to consist of a charge of $15,000 for the<br>year in question and the<br>had been accrued in previous years. It was clear that<br>the company had not made a<br>period of 8 years.<br>expense had been properly reflected in the accounts.<br>You made a note of this and added it to your list of<br>backlog of the amoea<br>amount which<br>payment of taxes<br>It had, however, ensured that the<br>points to be discussed at the client meeting. You<br>poim<br>remembered that no mention was made of this fact in<br>the consent letter which you had received from the<br>predecessor auditor. You had not been given access to<br>their working papers for the previous year.<br>Whilst the accounts appear to be correctly stated, on the<br>premise that taxes are due to be paid, you are<br>concerned that it would appear as though the company<br>had never tried to resolve this issue with the tax<br>authorities. You also have concerns about how this item<br>will be treated in the corporate tax computation.<br>

Extracted text: Scenario You are the audit engagement partner at A Ltd, a small firm of public accountants. You were recently appointed as auditor to a local company named B Ltd. The previous auditors, Z & Co, had resigned due to having so few audit clients that it was no longer commercially viable for the firm to retain its registered public accounting firm opportunity for your firm to take on the client and you and your fellow audit client in what was proving to be a difficult business environment. Times were well aware that redundancies were not out of the status. This had provided the v partners were delighted to be gaining an inly tough and you were question if more work was not picked up quickly. You had met Mr X, B Ltd.'s Managing Director (MD), at various local events and had a good personal relationship good reputation in was involved a You believed that this was a good client to win and, with Mr X's considerable business connections, this might not be the only audit client that you would pick up in the coming months. Mr X had assured you that a good working pack ( Audit Fee) would be prepared by his newly installed finance director (FD) to support the figures in the draft financial statements. Additionally, the client would arrange for was not picked up with him, Mr X was someone with a very community and of charitable fundraising activities. the local business final publication accounts. Six months down the line, you are sitting at your desk reviewing the audit working papers of B Ltd. As you had imagined, the fieldwork had been done within budget and the files appeared to show that, as Mr X had earlier company had maintained a good set of records and produced appropriate documentation to support the draft figures. Some minor errors had been of unadjusted errors, significance, and you had all but watch, another 20 minutes would see you complete your task – the client was now keen to sign off in seven days' time, three weeks earlier than had originally been envisaged. This had just allowed you time to review the files in advance of a meeting with Mr X and his FD later that week to discuss any major issues prior to signing. advised, the noted and added the summary ofr but nothing of finished any your review. You looked at VOUE M You continued with the task at hand and opened the creditors section of the file and reviewed the lead schedule. Everything this year appeared in line with that of the previous year. There were no major variations and, to be honest, you had not expected any. There was, however, a note from the audit senior stating that a large accrual had been included for taxes – and indeed an accrual of $163,937 was included the accounts. This appeared to consist of a charge of $15,000 for the year in question and the had been accrued in previous years. It was clear that the company had not made a period of 8 years. expense had been properly reflected in the accounts. You made a note of this and added it to your list of backlog of the amoea amount which payment of taxes It had, however, ensured that the points to be discussed at the client meeting. You poim remembered that no mention was made of this fact in the consent letter which you had received from the predecessor auditor. You had not been given access to their working papers for the previous year. Whilst the accounts appear to be correctly stated, on the premise that taxes are due to be paid, you are concerned that it would appear as though the company had never tried to resolve this issue with the tax authorities. You also have concerns about how this item will be treated in the corporate tax computation.
Jun 03, 2022
SOLUTION.PDF

Get Answer To This Question

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here