TaskIn the contemporary management environment, mergers and acquisitions are hot topics; particularly as mergers and acquisitions are among the most commonly used strategies for growth.The pitfalls of...

1 answer below »
TaskIn the contemporary management environment, mergers and acquisitions are hot topics; particularly as mergers and acquisitions are among the most commonly used strategies for growth.The pitfalls of mergers are well known and well-studied in the management literature.Yet, there are some fundamental challenges that organisations keep stumbling over. One of them is integration. Preoccupation with due diligence and political factors surrounding merger negotiations too often leaves a crucial piece in the merger puzzle left till it is too late – integration of cultures and structures and people. It is well known today that poor results from mergers can so often be put down to people issues.In this major assessment you are asked to analyse the following case and answer the questions below using a business report format. Further detail on the format of the business report are provided below.Case study: Who goes, Who stays?http://ezproxy.csu.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=3933433&site=ehost-live
QuestionsUsing the knowledge that you have gained from the subject up to, and including, Topic 9, Managing people, answer the following questions.

  1. What conflicting values are at stake in the case? Identify and explain, using relevant management theory and concepts. Contextualise your answer with reference to literature on integration problems in mergers and acquisitions, with specific reference to people issues. (up to 400 words)

  2. Critique the process that is being applied to work out the details of the integration, particularly with regard to structure and top management staffing using relevant management theory and concepts. Ground your answer in evidence regarding people and culture issues in merger integration studies. (up to 700 words)

  3. How would you recommend the conflicting values be resolved? (up to 500 words)

  4. What process would you recommend that the two senior executives and their HR people follow to work out the details of integration in regard to the top structure? (up to 500 words)

  5. Evaluate the usefulness of the management and organisational theories and practices from the subject that you have applied in analysing the case (up to 400 words)

Beyond the resources provided in the topics, you will need to source and use additional literature to support your argument.At least 10 academic and professional referencesmust be used.At least five of these sourcesmust be from academic studies.RationaleSuccessful completion of this assessment will demonstrate your achievement of the following learning outcomes:

  • Be able to research and communicate effectively and professionally in a variety of organisational settings.

  • Be able to critically analyse and evaluate a variety of management and organisational theories and practices in the context of the contemporary business environment.

Marking criteria






































Criteria

High distinction

Distinction

Credit

Pass

Fail
Evidence-based application of management and organisational theory and practices (25)(Note: A minimum 10 references is required)The paper shows comprehensive knowledge and understanding of relevant management and organisational theories and practices.There is clear evidence of depth in critical thought, with quality supporting evidence.An extensive range of high quality information sources is used effectively.The paper shows wide knowledge and understanding of relevant management and organisational theories and practices.Sound critical thinking is evident in applying theory and practice.A wide range of quality information sources is used effectively.The paper shows knowledge and understanding of relevant management and organisational theories and practices.The argument demonstrates the ability to think critically about the application of management theory and practices. The sources used demonstrate the ability to be discriminating in the use of information.The paper makes a credible attempt at applying relevant management and organisational theories and practices. An attempt is made to apply critical thinking in the case analysis. A satisfactory range of source is used.Does not meet the minimum requirements for this criterion.
Research and professional communication (10)The paper demonstrates excellent research and professional communication.All sources are referenced fully and correctly using the APA6 referencing system.The paper demonstrates a high quality of research and professional communication.All sources are referenced fully and correctly using the APA6 referencing system.The paper demonstrates sound research and professional communication.All sources are referenced using the APA6 referencing system.The paper demonstrates satisfactory research and professional communication.A credible attempt is made to reference all sources using the APA6 referencing system.Does not meet the minimum requirements for this criterion.
Evaluation of management and organisational theory and practices (10)Management theory and practise is evaluated fully using clear criteria and high quality evidence.Management theory and practise is evaluated fully using clear criteria.Management theory and practise is evaluated using clear criteria.A credible attempt is made to evaluate theory and practise.Does not meet the minimum requirement for this criterion.

PresentationThe word counts provided in the question are for guidance only. You can vary these as you see fit.Use the information on academic writing that you gained in topic 4, together with the skills you have developed while completing assessment 3.Use the following format to write your business report.Title page showing the assessment title, subject code and title, your name and student number, and the word count.Executive SummaryIntroduction – one overall introduction to the reportReport sections (this is not a heading)- meaningful use of headings for each questionSummary and ConclusionList of references.The word count will not includethe executive summary, in-text citations and the list of references. Words contained in images, tables and diagrams are included in the word count.

Answered Same DayMay 17, 2020MGT501Charles Sturt University

Answer To: TaskIn the contemporary management environment, mergers and acquisitions are hot topics;...

Parul answered on May 18 2020
135 Votes
Q1. What conflicting values are at stake in the case? Identify and explain, using relevant management theory and concepts. Contextualise your answer with reference to literature on integration problem in mergers and acquisitions, with specific reference to people issues.
Ans 1) Conflicting Values at Stake in the case: -
With reference to the case, “Who Goes, Who Stays?” (Light, David A.; Kidd, David; De Monaco, Lawrence J., 2001) is based on the merger of two big pharmac
eutical companies - DeWaal Pharmaceuticals and BioHealth Labs and the issues that spirals from the major decisions taken by the top management and impact of those decisions on every stakeholder involved - employees, customers, middle level managers and the top management. Taking reference from “Cultural Conflict and Merger Failure: An Experimental Approach tick”, (Weber, R. A. & Camerer, C. F., 2003), the cord of the conflict was the difference in the management style and process of making decisions. Due to no clear resolution of the conflicts that emerged the performance of the organization as a whole suffered. This was also reflected by declining performance of the organization in the stock market.
Along with this, conflicts emerged from the amalgamation of different cultures. Bringing together two different cultures was the real challenge that created a lot of conflicts since neither of the two companies were sensitive to the cultural differences and attempted to resolve it at the ground level.
Another reason of the conflict was how to resolve the problem of integration was witnessed by the DeWaal Bio Health after merging the businesses of two big continents spanning New York and Netherlands. Many regulatory hurdles were presented by the FTC and the European Commission.
The new organization so formed had conflicts in selecting who would be in the top-management and who won’t. This issue was catching fire and was like a ticking bomb since there were approximately 2 people for each senior level executive for the organization, to be specific from the case 120 people has applied for senior level job while vacancies in the new dynamics were only around 65. Hence, there was a grave problem of high attrition as talented employees were leaving the organization and joining the competition.
Applying Management Concept to Conflicts faced in DeWaal BioHealth
Mergers or Acquisition of two or more companies engage in number of negotiations that generates huge number of transactions. Taking reference from the article, “Post‐merger integration and change processes from a complexity perspective” (Lauser, B.,2010) Specifically, merger is the integration of two or more companies that brings with it different style of management, beliefs values, cultures and imposes all of them to become as one unit. The case in point, “Who Goes, Who Stays?” (Light, David A.; Kidd, David; De Monaco, Lawrence J., 2001) merger of DeWaal BioHealth is an example of a horizontal merger. As observed in the case and explicitly explained above this union of two different companies brought with itself few anomalies. Essentially there is grave issue of integration of two different culture and exiting workflow management in two companies.
System Dynamics - Each companies have its own system in place and is accustomed to exchange views with each other in certain way. Interesting details were mentioned in the article that erupts when merger takes place, “Organizational Change Management for Merger and Acquisition Integration”, (Powers, L., 2017) Hidden factors like politics, admin, IT and other systems like accounting gets affected when merger takes place. How would business unit be aligned and employees orient such that they behave in a certain way.
Structure-Focused Differences - At the time when two companies merge it may spiral up in downsizing of employees and decentralization of many units. This occurs because the organization as a whole urge to minimize on expense and advance the productivity and efficiency. Any companies who merge should be sensitive to the laws that prevails in that part of the world rather than conflicting them
People-focused change - This change is focused more with employees and workforce planning such that merger could enhance the competence and performance of the employees. This demands to redefine the organization mission, targets and goals. Also, making sure that other functions like recruitment, selection, performance management policies, grievance handling and employee training be re-worked by blending the existing procedures
Q2. Critique the process that is being applied to work out the details of the integration, particularly with regard to structure and top management staffing using relevant management theory...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here