testing for side gab on questions page
BSA201 Principles of Systems BFA522 Risk Management Semester 2, 2017 1 Assessment 3; Capstone Assessment Marking Scheme The Capstone Assignment will be assessed using the criteria below to indicate the major areas of assessment, the proportion of the total marks allocated for each and the standards expected within those areas. The group contribution table will also be used to adjust the mark for a team member’s individual achievement of the criteria, where necessary. Assessment Criteria Poor<50% adequate 50–59% good 60–69% very good 70–79% outstanding 80–100% 1 30% demonstrates knowledge of risk & approaches to manage risk insufficient evidence of ability to: identify & define risk & risk consequences; identify/justify/ assess risk mitigation, avoidance & transfer strategies, & conditions for accepting risks, use of risk terminology & processes from standards; identify, apply & document appropriate quantitative & qualitative ways to measure probability/consequence; poor/no incorporation of ideas from modules 6 and on. some evidence seen of ability to identify & define risk & risk consequences; identify/justify/ assess risk mitigation, avoidance & transfer strategies, & conditions for accepting risks, use of risk terminology & processes from standards; identify, apply & document appropriate quantitative & qualitative ways to measure probability/consequence. some ideas incorporated from module 6 on. significant gaps and/or inconsistencies seen. in general good achievement seen in identifying, & defining risk & risk consequences; identifies/justifies/ assesses risk mitigation, avoidance & transfer strategies, & conditions for accepting risks, uses risk terminology & processes from standards; identifies, applies & documents appropriate quantitative & qualitative ways to measure probability/consequence. some appropriate incorporation of ideas from module 6 on. some gaps & inconsistencies noted. very good achievement in identifying, & defining risk & risk consequences; identifies/justifies/ assesses risk mitigation, avoidance & transfer strategies, & conditions for accepting risks, uses risk terminology & processes from standards; identifies, applies & documents appropriate quantitative & qualitative ways to measure probability/consequence. meaningful incorporation of some ideas from module 6 on. outstanding achievement in identifying, & defining risk & risk consequences; identifies/justifies/ assesses risk mitigation, avoidance & transfer strategies, & conditions for accepting risks, uses risk terminology & processes from standards; identifies, applies & documents appropriate quantitative & qualitative ways to measure probability/consequence. excellent integration of ideas from module 6 on. 2 40% identifies & explains risk types applicable to a specific industry/ies & organisation, & its activities lack of achievement in defining relevant risks for specified organisation, its activities & industry. little identification of, & reporting on, relevant operational risks for organisation/ industry /activities. some evidence of achievement in defining relevant risks for specified organisation, its activities & industry. some identification of, & reporting on, relevant operational risks for same organisation/ industry/ activities. significant gaps and/or inconsistencies seen. in general, good achievement in defining relevant risks for specified organisation, its activities & industry. good identification of, & reporting on, relevant operational risks for same organisation/industry/ activities. some gaps & inconsistencies noted. very good achievement in defining relevant risks for specified organisation, its activities & industry. very good identification of, & reporting on, relevant operational risks for same organisation/industry/ activities. outstanding achievement in defining relevant risks for specified organisation, its activities & industry. impressive identification of, & reporting on, relevant operational risks for same organisation/industry/activities . bfa522 risk management semester 2, 2017 2 3 30% applies risk management processes to specified organisation; provides advice insufficient achievement in: identifying relevant risks, qualitative & and quantitative methods to measure probability & likelihood for specific risks for specified organisation; applying methods & justifying; constructing appropriate records; concisely communicating risk issues & recommendations for proposed treatments in required format. poor/no business report structure; poor style. inappropriate use of sources. some achievement in: identifying relevant risks, qualitative & quantitative methods to measure probability & likelihood for specific risks for specified organisation; applying methods & justifying; constructing appropriate records; concisely communicating risk issues & recommendations for proposed treatments in required format. just acceptable business report structure & style. some inappropriate use of sources. significant gaps & inconsistencies noted. in general, good achievement in: identifying relevant risks, qualitative & and quantitative methods to measure probability & likelihood for specific risks for specified organisation; applying methods & justifying; constructing appropriate records; concisely communicating risk issues & recommendations for proposed treatments in required format. good business report structure & style. appropriate use of resources. some gaps & inconsistencies noted. very good achievement in: identifying relevant risks, qualitative & and quantitative methods to measure probability & likelihood for specific risks for specified organisation; applying methods & justifying; constructing appropriate records; concisely communicating risk issues & recommendations for proposed treatments in required format. very good business report structure & style. very good use of resources. outstanding achievement in: identifying relevant risks, qualitative & and quantitative methods to measure probability & likelihood for specific risks for specified organisation; applying methods & justifying; constructing appropriate records; concisely communicating risk issues & recommendations for proposed treatments in required format. excellent business report structure & style, and use of resources. notes: 1.tables of individual contribution to the group work may be used to adjust the allocation of individual marks. 2. every case of possible plagiarism will be reported to the head of school for investigation. 3. read this rubric carefully, as there are some differences from the assessment 2 rubric. 4. criterion 1 and 2 will be influenced by the assumptions and output of your group work. bfa522 capstone assignment 2017 report structure required business report structure for individual capstone assessment: undertake a risk management process for source 1. tsbe individual assignment cover sheet 2. title page (which is different to an assignment cover sheet): include the name of the recipient of the report and business name in full, consultant’s name (as preparer of business report), title of report (risk analysis for source) and date. no student or unit details. 3. executive summary (in no more than one page), explain the purpose of the report, the report’s recipient, the method of data collection and analysis used, the conclusions reached and recommendations for the organisation, based on the investigation results and the requirements of the report. 4. table of contents; must be generated automatically through word. see instructions at: http://shaunakelly.com/word/numbering/tableofcontents.html 5. introduction: an introduction is different to an abstract. briefly mention the report’s recipient, its preparer, and the aim and purpose of the investigation (see heading at top of page). start page numbering from page 1 from the start of the introduction. write in third person for your report. for information from griffith university about how to write in third person, go to: https://sites.google.com/a/griffith.edu.au/redbook/more/tips-for-writing/writing-in-the-third-person 6. the body of the report, divided into subsections with a heading for each. do not call any of this section “body”. include your tables and schedules to support your analysis. refer to each table as “table 1”, or “table 2”, and so on, and mention the table by number within the text of the report. state any sources as a citation with a matching reference in a list of references. separate your analysis and results. 7. conclusion: the conclusion will link the results of the investigation set out in the body to the business report’s purpose. 8. recommendation: separate the conclusions from the recommendations; each has a different purpose. write clear recommendation/s for the organisation. 9. references: set out in harvard style. a web address alone is not a full reference; include where to access the electronic site and date it was available . note: all parts of the individual assignment submission are included in the word limit, with the exception of the school cover page and the group contribution summary. the group context statement will be submitted to a different folder, and is not included within the individual word limit. however the group context statement as submitted is limited to 1000 words. it does not need to be set out in report format. the work limit for the group context statement includes all parts, except for the group cover sheet. 1 adequate="" 50–59%="" good="" 60–69%="" very="" good="" 70–79%="" outstanding="" 80–100%="" 1="" 30%="" demonstrates="" knowledge="" of="" risk="" &="" approaches="" to="" manage="" risk="" insufficient="" evidence="" of="" ability="" to:="" identify="" &="" define="" risk="" &="" risk="" consequences;="" identify/justify/="" assess="" risk="" mitigation,="" avoidance="" &="" transfer="" strategies,="" &="" conditions="" for="" accepting="" risks,="" use="" of="" risk="" terminology="" &="" processes="" from="" standards;="" identify,="" apply="" &="" document="" appropriate="" quantitative="" &="" qualitative="" ways="" to="" measure="" probability/consequence;="" poor/no="" incorporation="" of="" ideas="" from="" modules="" 6="" and="" on.="" some="" evidence="" seen="" of="" ability="" to="" identify="" &="" define="" risk="" &="" risk="" consequences;="" identify/justify/="" assess="" risk="" mitigation,="" avoidance="" &="" transfer="" strategies,="" &="" conditions="" for="" accepting="" risks,="" use="" of="" risk="" terminology="" &="" processes="" from="" standards;="" identify,="" apply="" &="" document="" appropriate="" quantitative="" &="" qualitative="" ways="" to="" measure="" probability/consequence.="" some="" ideas="" incorporated="" from="" module="" 6="" on.="" significant="" gaps="" and/or="" inconsistencies="" seen.="" in="" general="" good="" achievement="" seen="" in="" identifying,="" &="" defining="" risk="" &="" risk="" consequences;="" identifies/justifies/="" assesses="" risk="" mitigation,="" avoidance="" &="" transfer="" strategies,="" &="" conditions="" for="" accepting="" risks,="" uses="" risk="" terminology="" &="" processes="" from="" standards;="" identifies,="" applies="" &="" documents="" appropriate="" quantitative="" &="" qualitative="" ways="" to="" measure="" probability/consequence.="" some="" appropriate="" incorporation="" of="" ideas="" from="" module="" 6="" on.="" some="" gaps="" &="" inconsistencies="" noted.="" very="" good="" achievement="" in="" identifying,="" &="" defining="" risk="" &="" risk="" consequences;="" identifies/justifies/="" assesses="" risk="" mitigation,="" avoidance="" &="" transfer="" strategies,="" &="" conditions="" for="" accepting="" risks,="" uses="" risk="" terminology="" &="" processes="" from="" standards;="" identifies,="" applies="" &="" documents="" appropriate="" quantitative="" &="" qualitative="" ways="" to="" measure="" probability/consequence.="" meaningful="" incorporation="" of="" some="" ideas="" from="" module="" 6="" on.="" outstanding="" achievement="" in="" identifying,="" &="" defining="" risk="" &="" risk="" consequences;="" identifies/justifies/="" assesses="" risk="" mitigation,="" avoidance="" &="" transfer="" strategies,="" &="" conditions="" for="" accepting="" risks,="" uses="" risk="" terminology="" &="" processes="" from="" standards;="" identifies,="" applies="" &="" documents="" appropriate="" quantitative="" &="" qualitative="" ways="" to="" measure="" probability/consequence.="" excellent="" integration="" of="" ideas="" from="" module="" 6="" on.="" 2="" 40%="" identifies="" &="" explains="" risk="" types="" applicable="" to="" a="" specific="" industry/ies="" &="" organisation,="" &="" its="" activities="" lack="" of="" achievement="" in="" defining="" relevant="" risks="" for="" specified="" organisation,="" its="" activities="" &="" industry.="" little="" identification="" of,="" &="" reporting="" on,="" relevant="" operational="" risks="" for="" organisation/="" industry="" activities.="" some="" evidence="" of="" achievement="" in="" defining="" relevant="" risks="" for="" specified="" organisation,="" its="" activities="" &="" industry.="" some="" identification="" of,="" &="" reporting="" on,="" relevant="" operational="" risks="" for="" same="" organisation/="" industry/="" activities.="" significant="" gaps="" and/or="" inconsistencies="" seen.="" in="" general,="" good="" achievement="" in="" defining="" relevant="" risks="" for="" specified="" organisation,="" its="" activities="" &="" industry.="" good="" identification="" of,="" &="" reporting="" on,="" relevant="" operational="" risks="" for="" same="" organisation/industry/="" activities.="" some="" gaps="" &="" inconsistencies="" noted.="" very="" good="" achievement="" in="" defining="" relevant="" risks="" for="" specified="" organisation,="" its="" activities="" &="" industry.="" very="" good="" identification="" of,="" &="" reporting="" on,="" relevant="" operational="" risks="" for="" same="" organisation/industry/="" activities.="" outstanding="" achievement="" in="" defining="" relevant="" risks="" for="" specified="" organisation,="" its="" activities="" &="" industry.="" impressive="" identification="" of,="" &="" reporting="" on,="" relevant="" operational="" risks="" for="" same="" organisation/industry/activities="" .="" bfa522="" risk="" management="" semester="" 2,="" 2017="" 2="" 3="" 30%="" applies="" risk="" management="" processes="" to="" specified="" organisation;="" provides="" advice="" insufficient="" achievement="" in:="" identifying="" relevant="" risks,="" qualitative="" &="" and="" quantitative="" methods="" to="" measure="" probability="" &="" likelihood="" for="" specific="" risks="" for="" specified="" organisation;="" applying="" methods="" &="" justifying;="" constructing="" appropriate="" records;="" concisely="" communicating="" risk="" issues="" &="" recommendations="" for="" proposed="" treatments="" in="" required="" format.="" poor/no="" business="" report="" structure;="" poor="" style.="" inappropriate="" use="" of="" sources.="" some="" achievement="" in:="" identifying="" relevant="" risks,="" qualitative="" &="" quantitative="" methods="" to="" measure="" probability="" &="" likelihood="" for="" specific="" risks="" for="" specified="" organisation;="" applying="" methods="" &="" justifying;="" constructing="" appropriate="" records;="" concisely="" communicating="" risk="" issues="" &="" recommendations="" for="" proposed="" treatments="" in="" required="" format.="" just="" acceptable="" business="" report="" structure="" &="" style.="" some="" inappropriate="" use="" of="" sources.="" significant="" gaps="" &="" inconsistencies="" noted.="" in="" general,="" good="" achievement="" in:="" identifying="" relevant="" risks,="" qualitative="" &="" and="" quantitative="" methods="" to="" measure="" probability="" &="" likelihood="" for="" specific="" risks="" for="" specified="" organisation;="" applying="" methods="" &="" justifying;="" constructing="" appropriate="" records;="" concisely="" communicating="" risk="" issues="" &="" recommendations="" for="" proposed="" treatments="" in="" required="" format.="" good="" business="" report="" structure="" &="" style.="" appropriate="" use="" of="" resources.="" some="" gaps="" &="" inconsistencies="" noted.="" very="" good="" achievement="" in:="" identifying="" relevant="" risks,="" qualitative="" &="" and="" quantitative="" methods="" to="" measure="" probability="" &="" likelihood="" for="" specific="" risks="" for="" specified="" organisation;="" applying="" methods="" &="" justifying;="" constructing="" appropriate="" records;="" concisely="" communicating="" risk="" issues="" &="" recommendations="" for="" proposed="" treatments="" in="" required="" format.="" very="" good="" business="" report="" structure="" &="" style.="" very="" good="" use="" of="" resources.="" outstanding="" achievement="" in:="" identifying="" relevant="" risks,="" qualitative="" &="" and="" quantitative="" methods="" to="" measure="" probability="" &="" likelihood="" for="" specific="" risks="" for="" specified="" organisation;="" applying="" methods="" &="" justifying;="" constructing="" appropriate="" records;="" concisely="" communicating="" risk="" issues="" &="" recommendations="" for="" proposed="" treatments="" in="" required="" format.="" excellent="" business="" report="" structure="" &="" style,="" and="" use="" of="" resources.="" notes:="" 1.tables="" of="" individual="" contribution="" to="" the="" group="" work="" may="" be="" used="" to="" adjust="" the="" allocation="" of="" individual="" marks.="" 2.="" every="" case="" of="" possible="" plagiarism="" will="" be="" reported="" to="" the="" head="" of="" school="" for="" investigation.="" 3.="" read="" this="" rubric="" carefully,="" as="" there="" are="" some="" differences="" from="" the="" assessment="" 2="" rubric.="" 4.="" criterion="" 1="" and="" 2="" will="" be="" influenced="" by="" the="" assumptions="" and="" output="" of="" your="" group="" work.="" bfa522="" capstone="" assignment="" 2017="" report="" structure="" required="" business="" report="" structure="" for="" individual="" capstone="" assessment:="" undertake="" a="" risk="" management="" process="" for="" source="" 1.="" tsbe="" individual="" assignment="" cover="" sheet="" 2.="" title="" page="" (which="" is="" different="" to="" an="" assignment="" cover="" sheet):="" include="" the="" name="" of="" the="" recipient="" of="" the="" report="" and="" business="" name="" in="" full,="" consultant’s="" name="" (as="" preparer="" of="" business="" report),="" title="" of="" report="" (risk="" analysis="" for="" source)="" and="" date.="" no="" student="" or="" unit="" details.="" 3.="" executive="" summary="" (in="" no="" more="" than="" one="" page),="" explain="" the="" purpose="" of="" the="" report,="" the="" report’s="" recipient,="" the="" method="" of="" data="" collection="" and="" analysis="" used,="" the="" conclusions="" reached="" and="" recommendations="" for="" the="" organisation,="" based="" on="" the="" investigation="" results="" and="" the="" requirements="" of="" the="" report.="" 4.="" table="" of="" contents;="" must="" be="" generated="" automatically="" through="" word.="" see="" instructions="" at:="" http://shaunakelly.com/word/numbering/tableofcontents.html="" 5.="" introduction:="" an="" introduction="" is="" different="" to="" an="" abstract.="" briefly="" mention="" the="" report’s="" recipient,="" its="" preparer,="" and="" the="" aim="" and="" purpose="" of="" the="" investigation="" (see="" heading="" at="" top="" of="" page).="" start="" page="" numbering="" from="" page="" 1="" from="" the="" start="" of="" the="" introduction.="" write="" in="" third="" person="" for="" your="" report.="" for="" information="" from="" griffith="" university="" about="" how="" to="" write="" in="" third="" person,="" go="" to:="" https://sites.google.com/a/griffith.edu.au/redbook/more/tips-for-writing/writing-in-the-third-person="" 6.="" the="" body="" of="" the="" report,="" divided="" into="" subsections="" with="" a="" heading="" for="" each.="" do="" not="" call="" any="" of="" this="" section="" “body”.="" include="" your="" tables="" and="" schedules="" to="" support="" your="" analysis.="" refer="" to="" each="" table="" as="" “table="" 1”,="" or="" “table="" 2”,="" and="" so="" on,="" and="" mention="" the="" table="" by="" number="" within="" the="" text="" of="" the="" report.="" state="" any="" sources="" as="" a="" citation="" with="" a="" matching="" reference="" in="" a="" list="" of="" references.="" separate="" your="" analysis="" and="" results.="" 7.="" conclusion:="" the="" conclusion="" will="" link="" the="" results="" of="" the="" investigation="" set="" out="" in="" the="" body="" to="" the="" business="" report’s="" purpose.="" 8.="" recommendation:="" separate="" the="" conclusions="" from="" the="" recommendations;="" each="" has="" a="" different="" purpose.="" write="" clear="" recommendation/s="" for="" the="" organisation.="" 9.="" references:="" set="" out="" in="" harvard="" style.="" a="" web="" address="" alone="" is="" not="" a="" full="" reference;="" include="" where="" to="" access="" the="" electronic="" site="" and="" date="" it="" was="" available="" .="" note:="" all="" parts="" of="" the="" individual="" assignment="" submission="" are="" included="" in="" the="" word="" limit,="" with="" the="" exception="" of="" the="" school="" cover="" page="" and="" the="" group="" contribution="" summary.="" the="" group="" context="" statement="" will="" be="" submitted="" to="" a="" different="" folder,="" and="" is="" not="" included="" within="" the="" individual="" word="" limit.="" however="" the="" group="" context="" statement="" as="" submitted="" is="" limited="" to="" 1000="" words.="" it="" does="" not="" need="" to="" be="" set="" out="" in="" report="" format.="" the="" work="" limit="" for="" the="" group="" context="" statement="" includes="" all="" parts,="" except="" for="" the="" group="" cover="" sheet.="">