The management of Deep Pocket Fund have requested that you provide a detailed financial analysis of each option and prepare a report that recommends a preferred option. The following requests have...

1 answer below »
The management of Deep Pocket Fund have requested that you provide a detailed financial analysis of each option and prepare a report that recommends a preferred option. The following requests have been made about the analysis and report: - The financial analysis is to be completed in Excel. The file is to be easily adjustable for different scenarios and all inputs must be in the one sheet called ‘Assumptions’. The analysis of each solar system type must be on a separate sheet. - The report is to be short (600 words + 20% tolerance) and written in a manner that can be understood by a person with a basic understanding of financial analytical tools. - The report sections include: Summary, Methodology, Recommendations and Limitations. o Summary: brief outline of the task and advises of the recommendation. o Methodology: must explain and justify the methodology employed. o Recommendations: recommend a preferred option. In addition, includes analysis on the sensitivity of the decision to the discount rate (e.g. try between 5% and 15%). o Limitations: must identify key limitations with the analysis (recommend additional analysis to alleviate these limitations where appropriate)


EFB210: FINANCE 1, Semester 1 2019 Capital Budgeting Report and Analysis ___________________________________________________________________________________ General Information Marks: 25 Weight: 25% Format: Report and Analysis Due: 12 May 2019 (end of day, 11:59pm) Submission: Submit report and Excel analysis files by uploading your files to the Finance 1 Assignment portal in Blackboard. Note that when saving and submitting the report and analysis files, please ensure that: - You upload the correct files and that the files are not corrupted in any way. As markers, we can only mark what is provided to us at the time of submission. - Each filename must include your name and student number, and the file extensions must be either .docx (report) or .xlsx (analysis). o For example, if Jon Snow was studying Finance 1, he would save his report and analysis as:  Jon Snow 1234567 Report.docx  Jon Snow 1234567 Analysis.xlsx o Please note that file types that cannot be opened in Word or Excel, e.g. numbers files, are not accepted. o Part of the assignment’s CRA relates to correct filenames. __________________________________________________________________________________ Background information: Deep Pocket Fund (DPF) has a solar energy project under evaluation. The initial investment of this project includes land purchase and a solar energy generating system. Deep Pocket Fund has no plan to operate it forever. Their strategy is to set up the energy plant and sell the energy to the spot market as a long-term project. As a financial analyst of DPF, your manager asked you to evaluate the project, and offer advice on which solar system they should adopt. The detailed information is as below: 1. Project life is 30 years. 2. Land cost $5 million. The land is expected to appreciate by 1.5% per year over 30 years. Assume your cost of land is a fair market value and you are expected to sell the land at fair market value by the end of 30 years. 3. You have a choice of choosing fixed solar panels or rotating solar panel systems. 1 MWh (1000 kW per hour) system of rotating panel systems costs $1.3 million. Your purchased land allows you to build a 25MWh system. A rotating solar system is more efficient in producing solar energy with an average output of 5.6 hours per day. The maintenance cost is about 10% of the sales revenue. 4. If you use fixed solar panel systems. 1MWh (1000 kW per hour) system costs $1.1 million. You can build a 30MWh system as the fixed systems require less space. However, the effective output from the average daily sunshine is about 4.5 hours. The maintenance cost is about 8% of the sales revenue. 5. You can sell your electricity to the spot market at price of $80 per MWh in the first three years and then the price will increase by $2 every three years. You will also get a government bonus of $70 per MWh (e.g, Large-Scale Generation Certificate) for the first 5 years. 6. After 30 years, it will cost you $50,000 to dump all equipment and clean the site. 7. Additional assumptions: - The discount rate for the project is 9%. - The tax rate is constant at 30%. Capital gains tax is 15% for land sales after 30 years (50% discount of the normal tax rate). - Straight line depreciation of solar systems with zero salvage. - 365 days per year. - Both systems will lose 0.75% efficiency per year. Image source: https://www.renewwisconsin.org/solarfarms/ Task The management of Deep Pocket Fund have requested that you provide a detailed financial analysis of each option and prepare a report that recommends a preferred option. The following requests have been made about the analysis and report: - The financial analysis is to be completed in Excel. The file is to be easily adjustable for different scenarios and all inputs must be in the one sheet called ‘Assumptions’. The analysis of each solar system type must be on a separate sheet. - The report is to be short (600 words + 20% tolerance) and written in a manner that can be understood by a person with a basic understanding of financial analytical tools. - The report sections include: Summary, Methodology, Recommendations and Limitations. o Summary: brief outline of the task and advises of the recommendation. o Methodology: must explain and justify the methodology employed. o Recommendations: recommend a preferred option. In addition, includes analysis on the sensitivity of the decision to the discount rate (e.g. try between 5% and 15%). o Limitations: must identify key limitations with the analysis (recommend additional analysis to alleviate these limitations where appropriate) - Disclaimer: While information collected is to provide a realistic setting, this case study is for educative purposes only and should not be used for any other purpose. All mistakes are those of the author and not QUT. EFB210 Finance 1 (Sem. 1, 2019) Assignment Criteria Sheet, Report (25%) Student Name: _______________________________________Student No: ______________________ Criteria 7 6 5 4<4 knowledge [ks 1.1: demonstrate and apply integrated discipline knowledge across the broad field of business with depth in one or more core business disciplines] select and describe your choice of methodology appropriate for the task methodology chosen is appropriate to task and described in full detail; full justification of choice is provided methodology chosen is appropriate to task and described in adequate detail; good justification of choice is provided methodology chosen is appropriate to task though description lacks detail in parts; adequate justification of choice is provided methodology chosen is appropriate to task but description is incorrect or generally lacks detail; attempt made to justify choice chosen methodology is not appropriate for task; limited and incorrect description of methodology or justification of choice is provided technical and technological skills [ks 1.2: apply technical and technological skills appropriate and effective for real world business purposes and contexts] correct implementation of methodology all steps of chosen methodology correctly applied; correct answer derived from the data or only a minor calculation error methodology applied but containing an error; an error in calculations may be present methodology applied but two errors in calculation and/or methodology are present numerous errors are present in methodology and/or calculations methodology not implemented or is applied incorrectly; major calculation errors are present demonstrated ability to use excel effectively all references are correct; layout and formatting of spreadsheet are logical and professional. uses correct filename. references, layout, formatting and filename are largely correct and professional, though a minor error may be present references, layout, formatting and filename are largely correct and professional, though a few minor errors may be present references, layout, formatting and filename are largely correct and professional, though several errors may be present spreadsheet not provided or contains major errors; spreadsheet layout and formatting contain major errors or are not appropriate higher order thinking skills [ho 2.2: exercise independent judgement in applying knowledge and skills for effective planning, problem solving and decision making in diverse contexts] provide sound conclusion based on correct interpretation of analysis results conclusions address all aspects of task, are coherent, correctly derived from analysis, and are explained in detail in the context of relevant key limitations conclusions address all aspects of task, are coherent, correctly derived from analysis, and explained in detail; most key limitations have been identified and adequately explained conclusions address most aspects of task, correctly derived from analysis, though may lack some detail; most key limitations have been identified but lack some detail in parts. conclusions address most aspects of task, although link to underlying analysis may be unclear in parts; identifies limitations that are not relevant and may not adequately explain these limitations or key relevant limitations. report fails to include conclusions addressing the task, or conclusions not supported by analysis; identifies largely irrelevant limitations. professional communication [pc 3.1: use information literacy skills, and communicate effectively and professionally in written forms for diverse purposes and contexts] communicate clearly, concisely and professionally report is comprehensive and succinctly written with a logical structure and clear expression; grammar, punctuation and syntax consistently correct; writing style is appropriate for audience and task; report is an original piece of work report is comprehensive with a logical structure and clear expression; grammar, punctuation, and syntax are mostly correct; writing style is appropriate for audience and task; report is an original piece of work report addresses most key aspects of the task and has a logical structure; grammar, punctuation and syntax are mostly correct, though expression may lack some clarity; writing style is appropriate for audience and task; report is an original piece of work report addresses some aspects of the task adequately and has logical structure; errors in grammar, punctuation, and syntax are present and expression lacks clarity in parts; writing style is appropriate for audience and/or task; report is an original piece of work report fails to communicate an effective response to the task; significant errors in grammar, punctuation, syntax or clarity; style not appropriate for audience or task; report is not an original piece of work total: knowledge="" [ks="" 1.1:="" demonstrate="" and="" apply="" integrated="" discipline="" knowledge="" across="" the="" broad="" field="" of="" business="" with="" depth="" in="" one="" or="" more="" core="" business="" disciplines]="" select="" and="" describe="" your="" choice="" of="" methodology="" appropriate="" for="" the="" task="" methodology="" chosen="" is="" appropriate="" to="" task="" and="" described="" in="" full="" detail;="" full="" justification="" of="" choice="" is="" provided="" methodology="" chosen="" is="" appropriate="" to="" task="" and="" described="" in="" adequate="" detail;="" good="" justification="" of="" choice="" is="" provided="" methodology="" chosen="" is="" appropriate="" to="" task="" though="" description="" lacks="" detail="" in="" parts;="" adequate="" justification="" of="" choice="" is="" provided="" methodology="" chosen="" is="" appropriate="" to="" task="" but="" description="" is="" incorrect="" or="" generally="" lacks="" detail;="" attempt="" made="" to="" justify="" choice="" chosen="" methodology="" is="" not="" appropriate="" for="" task;="" limited="" and="" incorrect="" description="" of="" methodology="" or="" justification="" of="" choice="" is="" provided="" technical="" and="" technological="" skills="" [ks="" 1.2:="" apply="" technical="" and="" technological="" skills="" appropriate="" and="" effective="" for="" real="" world="" business="" purposes="" and="" contexts]="" correct="" implementation="" of="" methodology="" all="" steps="" of="" chosen="" methodology="" correctly="" applied;="" correct="" answer="" derived="" from="" the="" data="" or="" only="" a="" minor="" calculation="" error="" methodology="" applied="" but="" containing="" an="" error;="" an="" error="" in="" calculations="" may="" be="" present="" methodology="" applied="" but="" two="" errors="" in="" calculation="" and/or="" methodology="" are="" present="" numerous="" errors="" are="" present="" in="" methodology="" and/or="" calculations="" methodology="" not="" implemented="" or="" is="" applied="" incorrectly;="" major="" calculation="" errors="" are="" present="" demonstrated="" ability="" to="" use="" excel="" effectively="" all="" references="" are="" correct;="" layout="" and="" formatting="" of="" spreadsheet="" are="" logical="" and="" professional.="" uses="" correct="" filename.="" references,="" layout,="" formatting="" and="" filename="" are="" largely="" correct="" and="" professional,="" though="" a="" minor="" error="" may="" be="" present="" references,="" layout,="" formatting="" and="" filename="" are="" largely="" correct="" and="" professional,="" though="" a="" few="" minor="" errors="" may="" be="" present="" references,="" layout,="" formatting="" and="" filename="" are="" largely="" correct="" and="" professional,="" though="" several="" errors="" may="" be="" present="" spreadsheet="" not="" provided="" or="" contains="" major="" errors;="" spreadsheet="" layout="" and="" formatting="" contain="" major="" errors="" or="" are="" not="" appropriate="" higher="" order="" thinking="" skills="" [ho="" 2.2:="" exercise="" independent="" judgement="" in="" applying="" knowledge="" and="" skills="" for="" effective="" planning,="" problem="" solving="" and="" decision="" making="" in="" diverse="" contexts]="" provide="" sound="" conclusion="" based="" on="" correct="" interpretation="" of="" analysis="" results="" conclusions="" address="" all="" aspects="" of="" task,="" are="" coherent,="" correctly="" derived="" from="" analysis,="" and="" are="" explained="" in="" detail="" in="" the="" context="" of="" relevant="" key="" limitations="" conclusions="" address="" all="" aspects="" of="" task,="" are="" coherent,="" correctly="" derived="" from="" analysis,="" and="" explained="" in="" detail;="" most="" key="" limitations="" have="" been="" identified="" and="" adequately="" explained="" conclusions="" address="" most="" aspects="" of="" task,="" correctly="" derived="" from="" analysis,="" though="" may="" lack="" some="" detail;="" most="" key="" limitations="" have="" been="" identified="" but="" lack="" some="" detail="" in="" parts.="" conclusions="" address="" most="" aspects="" of="" task,="" although="" link="" to="" underlying="" analysis="" may="" be="" unclear="" in="" parts;="" identifies="" limitations="" that="" are="" not="" relevant="" and="" may="" not="" adequately="" explain="" these="" limitations="" or="" key="" relevant="" limitations.="" report="" fails="" to="" include="" conclusions="" addressing="" the="" task,="" or="" conclusions="" not="" supported="" by="" analysis;="" identifies="" largely="" irrelevant="" limitations.="" professional="" communication="" [pc="" 3.1:="" use="" information="" literacy="" skills,="" and="" communicate="" effectively="" and="" professionally="" in="" written="" forms="" for="" diverse="" purposes="" and="" contexts]="" communicate="" clearly,="" concisely="" and="" professionally="" report="" is="" comprehensive="" and="" succinctly="" written="" with="" a="" logical="" structure="" and="" clear="" expression;="" grammar,="" punctuation="" and="" syntax="" consistently="" correct;="" writing="" style="" is="" appropriate="" for="" audience="" and="" task;="" report="" is="" an="" original="" piece="" of="" work="" report="" is="" comprehensive="" with="" a="" logical="" structure="" and="" clear="" expression;="" grammar,="" punctuation,="" and="" syntax="" are="" mostly="" correct;="" writing="" style="" is="" appropriate="" for="" audience="" and="" task;="" report="" is="" an="" original="" piece="" of="" work="" report="" addresses="" most="" key="" aspects="" of="" the="" task="" and="" has="" a="" logical="" structure;="" grammar,="" punctuation="" and="" syntax="" are="" mostly="" correct,="" though="" expression="" may="" lack="" some="" clarity;="" writing="" style="" is="" appropriate="" for="" audience="" and="" task;="" report="" is="" an="" original="" piece="" of="" work="" report="" addresses="" some="" aspects="" of="" the="" task="" adequately="" and="" has="" logical="" structure;="" errors="" in="" grammar,="" punctuation,="" and="" syntax="" are="" present="" and="" expression="" lacks="" clarity="" in="" parts;="" writing="" style="" is="" appropriate="" for="" audience="" and/or="" task;="" report="" is="" an="" original="" piece="" of="" work="" report="" fails="" to="" communicate="" an="" effective="" response="" to="" the="" task;="" significant="" errors="" in="" grammar,="" punctuation,="" syntax="" or="" clarity;="" style="" not="" appropriate="" for="" audience="" or="" task;="" report="" is="" not="" an="" original="" piece="" of="" work="">
Answered Same DayMay 09, 2021EFB210

Answer To: The management of Deep Pocket Fund have requested that you provide a detailed financial analysis of...

Sweta answered on May 11 2021
138 Votes
Assumptions
    Key inputs
    Project life    30
    Land cost    $ 5,000,000
    Land appreciation rate per annum    1.50%
    Sale price per MWh    80
    Price increase per 3 years    2
    First 5 year gov bonus per MWh    70
    Cleaning cost in year 30    $ 50,000
    Discount rate    9%
    Tax    30%

    Discounted capital gain tax    15%
    Days per year    365
    Efficiency lose yearly    0.75%    per annual
    Solar System
    Rotating system
    Installation cost per MWh    $ 1,300,000
    Total installed capacity    25    MWh
    Effective hours per day    5.6
    Maintenance cost percentage of sales    10%
    depreciation    straight line zero salvage
    Fix system
    Installation cost per MWh    1100000
    Total installed capacity    30    MWh
    Effective hours per day    4.5
    Maintenance cost percentage of sales    8%
    depreciation    straight line zero salvage
Analysis rotating system
                Year 1    Year 2    Year 3    Year 4    Year 5    Year 6    Year 7    Year 8    Year 9    Year 10    Year 11    Year 12    Year 13    Year 14    Year 15    Year 16    Year 17    Year 18    Year 19    Year 20    Year 21    Year 22    Year 23    Year 24    Year 25    Year 26    Year 27    Year 28    Year 29    Year 30    Total
    Production per year MWH            51,100    50,717    50,336    49,959    49,584    49,212    48,843    48,477    48,113    47,752    47,394    47,039    46,686    46,336    45,988    45,643    45,301    44,961    44,624    44,289    43,957    43,628    43,300    42,976    42,653    42,333    42,016    41,701    41,388    41,078    1,377,388
    Revenue per MWH            150    150    150    152    152    82    84    84    84    86    86    86    88    88    88    90    90    90    92    92    92    94    94    94    96    96    96    98    98    98
    Total Revenue            7,665,000    7,607,513    7,550,456    7,593,745    7,536,792    4,035,407    4,102,828    4,072,056    4,041,516    4,106,710    4,075,909    4,045,340    4,108,372    4,077,559    4,046,977    4,107,912    4,077,103    4,046,524    4,105,424    4,074,633    4,044,073    4,100,998    4,070,241    4,039,714    4,094,723    4,064,012    4,033,532    4,086,682    4,056,032    4,025,612    139,693,398
    Maintenance Cost            766,500    760,751    755,046    759,375    753,679    403,541    410,283    407,206    404,152    410,671    407,591    404,534    410,837    407,756    404,698    410,791    407,710    404,652    410,542    407,463    404,407    410,100    407,024    403,971    409,472    406,401    403,353    408,668    405,603    402,561    13,969,340
    Depreciation            1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    1,083,333    32,500,000
    Profits            5,815,167    5,763,428    5,712,077    5,751,038    5,699,780    2,548,533    2,609,212    2,581,518    2,554,031    2,612,705    2,584,985    2,557,473    2,614,201    2,586,470    2,558,946    2,613,788    2,586,059    2,558,539    2,611,548    2,583,837    2,556,333    2,607,565    2,579,883    2,552,409    2,601,917    2,574,278    2,546,846    2,594,681    2,567,096    2,539,718    93,224,058
    Tax...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here