Microsoft Word - OBHR Comparative Case Study Individual OBHR Comparative Case Study (20%) Individual assignment Due: Week 11 June 20, 12:00 noon Prepare a 1500-word comparative case study. Adhere to...

1 answer below »
This is an urgent assignment please - there is an APA template
Microsoft Word - OBHR Comparative Case Study IndividualOBHR Comparative Case Study (20%) Individual assignment Due: Week 11 June 20, 12:00 noon Prepare a 1500-word comparative case study. Adhere to the following format while preparing the case study. Choose two well documented case studies of different organizations. o One case study should be based on success story like Apple, Google, Microsoft. o Other case study should focus on organizational failure/project failure etc. like Blueberry, Nokia, Yahoo.  Research and analyze the organizational structure and culture for both organizations.  What is the mode of communication adopted by both organizations? How do employees interact with each other?  What kind of leadership style do these organizations prefer/follow? What is the management style of both organizations?  Explain how the organizational culture, structure and management style effects/relates to the success and failure of the organization?  What is the HR Strategic planning, recruitment and selection strategy, performance/ talent management strategy of both the organizations?  Based on the analysis performed propose suggestions and recommendations (5-6) based on the OBHR concepts learned in the course for both organizations. Report Requirements  The report must include a title page, executive summary/abstract, multiple supporting body paragraphs, conclusion and list of references. (NO table of contents)  Students must use a minimum of 10 references. All references must come from peer-reviewed academic journals (UCW University Library); additional references may be from trade and practitioner publications or online search engines.  Students must use APA format when citing literature.  Students are encouraged to use Grammarly to avoid plagiarism. If plagiarism is identified in the paper, the student will receive a zero for the assignment.  Do not exceed the word-limit. Marks will be deducted for excessive length. Therefore, do not include excessive detail on the history of the companies, their founders etc – get to the main points of the assignment quickly.APA writing conventions should be followed in the report with a minimum of ten (10) sources referenced and cited including in-text citations (if you are presenting another author’s ideas in your own language you still have to provide the in-text citation of that author), references in APA format, the report must demonstrate analysis of the material and its application to the workplace. Title of the company cannot be your report title due to copyright reasons. The submission date is mentioned in the course schedule (i.e., week 11) in the course syllabus. All submissions will be made to the Turnitin dropbox on Moodle. Please note that assignment submissions are ONLY accepted on Moodle and NOT via email. Kindly rename your assignment file by your respective name before you upload. For example, if Jane Smith is submitting her assignment, her assignment file name should be “Janesmith”. This assignment carries a 20% weight for your course mark, per the rubric mentioned below.Appendix – A Assessment Rubric for OBHR Comparative Case Study 1-4 Scale 1 2 3 4 Percentage Score Weight 0-59 60-67 68-71 72-75 76-79 80-84 85-89 90-100 Grades F C B- B B+ A- A A+ Mastery Level Beginning Developing Competent Mastery Standard Level Below Standard Approaching Standard At Standard Exceeds Standard Executive Summary/ Abstract 5 Executive summary or Abstract missing or poorly constructed Executive summary or Abstract inadequate Executive Summary or Abstract Executed Adequately Executive Summary or Abstract Executed in Superior Fashion Problem Identification & Scope 10 Shows little understanding of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues. Shows some understanding of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues. Shows adequate knowledge of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues. Shows superior knowledge of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues. Content 10 Does not address the case question with little relevant evidence (e.g., details, examples, facts, and expert opinions) Central idea and clarity of purpose are absent or incompletely expressed and maintained Lacks most of the necessary case parts Does not comment on (/evaluates) the differences Not all the major similarities and / or differences have been a (e.g., details, examples, facts, and expert opinions) Includes only a few of the necessary case parts Central idea and clarity of purpose are expressed though perhaps too vaguely or broadly Only minimally comments on (/evaluates) the differences Generally, addresses the case question by providing most major similarities and / or differences but loses focus at times by focusing on minor details Uses a few details, examples, facts, and expert opinions to elaborate on similarities and / or differences Includes most of the necessary case parts Comments on (/evaluates) some of the differences Addresses the case question by providing all major similarities and / or differences Uses some details, examples, facts, and expert opinions) to elaborate on the similarities and / or differences Includes all the case parts Comments on (/evaluates) the differences Case Analysis 15 Analysis of case poor analysis of issues of the case, supporting detail is incorrect or missing. No use of material from the textbook and course. Analysis of case shows inadequate levels of analysis of issues of the case, provides little supporting detail. Some material from the textbook and course was used. Analysis of case shows adequate levels of analysis of issues of the case, provides supporting details. Good use of material from the textbook and course. Analysis of case shows superior levels of analysis of underlying issues that are not necessarily readily apparent, uses appropriate levels of supporting detail. Substantial use of material from the textbook, library, and course.Recommendation and Conclusions 10 Recommendations and/or plans of action provided that are mostly incorrect or absent. No use of material from the textbook and course. Recommendations and/or plans of action provided that are partially correct, alternate viewpoints not considered. Some material from the textbook and course was used. Specific recommendations and/or plans of action provided that are substantially correct, alternate viewpoints may be considered. Good use of material from the textbook and course. Specific recommendations and/or plans of action provided that go beyond the expected scope of the case fully supported by data, alternate viewpoints fully considered. Substantial use of material from the textbook, library, and course. Organization & Critical ThinkingCoherence, Cohesion, organization, demonstration of thought process, analysis of problem using own thoughts and ideas 20 Similarities and differences have been clearly organized using either the block or thematic method. Very clear relationship between ideas Accurate use of connectors Accurate use of pronouns Clear match between the topic sentence, supporting sentences and concluding sentence in each body paragraph Similarities and differences are organized generally clearly using the block or thematic method but one of the paragraphs may cover more than one main idea Generally clear relationship between ideas Mostly correct use of connectors. Mostly correct use of pronouns The topic sentence, supporting sentences and concluding sentence (if any) support one main idea. Similarities and differences are organized generally clearly using the block or thematic method but one of the paragraphs may cover more than one main idea Generally clear relationship between ideas Mostly correct use of connectors. Mostly correct use of pronouns The topic sentence, supporting sentences and concluding sentence (if any) support one main idea. Similarities and differences have been clearly organized using either the block or thematic method. Very clear relationship between ideas Accurate use of connectors Accurate use of pronouns Clear match between the topic sentence, supporting sentences and concluding sentence in each body paragraph Style & Mechanics APA Application of the requirements of the 7th APA manual to create a standardized formatted presentation 10 7th Ed. APA Manual is not followed or there are significant errors in: title page & references pages. In-text citations, paraphrasing and direct quotes are quite inadequate but do not rise to the level of plagiarism 7th Ed. APA Manual is followed with significant errors in: title page & references pages. In-text citations, paraphrasing and direct quotes are lacking but do not rise to the level of plagiarism 7th Ed. APA Manual is followed with minor errors in: formatted title page, formatted references pages, in-text citations, paraphrasing and direct quotes are adequately used in the correct context 7th Ed. APA Manual is followed with no errors including: properly formatted title page, properly formatted references pages, in-text citations are correctly used, paraphrasing and direct quotes are properly used in the correct context Grammar/Punctuation/Spelling Use of proper English language grammar, spelling and punctuation to create a readable presentation. 10 Grammar and sentence structure has major problems following standard English rules and reads with difficulty
Answered Same DayJun 21, 2022

Answer To: Microsoft Word - OBHR Comparative Case Study Individual OBHR Comparative Case Study (20%) Individual...

Ayan answered on Jun 22 2022
14 Votes
1
Title of Pape
Your Name (your student number)
University Canada West
Course Number and Name
Instructor Name
Due Date
Abstract
In spite of the way that Apple and Blackbe
y are mechanical firms, their organizational structures and cultures are unfathomably unique. Apple is a more various leveled organization, with clear lines of power and communication. Blackbe
y is coordinated on a framework,
with many groups chipping away at different undertakings and items. Employees are urged to share thoughts and team up, and there is major areas of strength for an on coordinated effort. Apple faculty are more disposed to utilize official communication channels and communicate with each other in a more expert way. In this task, we will explore and examine the organizational structure and culture of both Apple and BlackBe
y, as well as their particular modes of communication and how employees collaborate with each other. We will likewise decide the leadership style of these associations and the management style they utilize. We likewise look at how organizational structure, culture, and structure interface with the achievement or disappointment of the singular associations, as well as what HR strategic planning for the associations involves. At long last, we make thoughts and suggestions for the two associations in view of our discoveries.
Table of contents
Introduction    4
Mode of communication    4
Leadership style    5
Organizational culture, structure and management style effects    6
HR Strategic planning, recruitment and selection strategy    7
Suggestions and recommendations    8
Conclusion    10
References    11
Introduction
Both Apple and Blackbe
y are centralized organizations with very unmistakable management draws near. Apple has a ton of command over its employees; however Blackbe
y gives them more prominent freedom. The two firms favor a leadership style that is exceptionally involved and dynamic. The two organizations put a high need on client joy, as well as productivity and creation. Apple is an incredibly hierarchical organization with a clear cut structure. Nonetheless, in this review, we will examine the reason why Apple was fruitful and Blackbe
y was not.
Mode of communication
Notwithstanding the way that Apple and Blackbe
y are innovative firms, their organizational structures and cultures are immensely unique. Apple is a more progressive organization, with clear lines of power and communication. Blackbe
y is coordinated on a lattice, with many groups dealing with different undertakings and items. Employees are urged to share thoughts and team up, and there are major areas of strength for an on coordinated effort. Apple faculty is more disposed to utilize official communication channels and communicate with each other in a more expert way (Clarke & Boersma, 2018). Blackbe
y, then again, is an all the more level structure, with employees urged to draw in and communicate openly. The manner in which Apple and Blackbe
y employees communicate with each other mi
ors this dissimilarity.
Thus, Apple's communication style is relaxed and clear. Employees communicate with each other consistently to trade thoughts, team up on tasks, and give criticism. Employees are urged to think past the case as a component of the organization's culture of development and imagination. Blackbe
y: At Blackbe
y, communication is formal and roundabout. Email, telephone, and different sorts of electronic communication are utilized by employees to communicate with each other. Employees are expected to have the option to work freely in an expert and proficient climate.
Leadership style
Apple is a centralized organization with a solid hierarchical management structure (Podolny & Hansen, 2020). With an unmistakable objective and exceptional execution, the management style is profoundly involved and order. The culture puts a critical premium on plan and style, as well as development and imagination. Worker steadfastness and commitment to the firm are areas of strength for very. On the opposite side, Blackbe
y is a more decentralized...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here