Using the models and theories of either (1) market structure, conduct and performance, (2) game theory or (3) the boundary of the firm, perform a microeconomic analysis of one appropriate economic issue or phenomenon of your choice - The rise of UberEats in Australia during the pandemic. Clearly explain your chosen question, method and conclusions. Comment on the link between market structure and performance for your chosen issue.Structure must be as follows:1.0 Introduction2.0 Model (why its a certain market structure - justify why the particular firm is a part of that structure e.g. oligopoly, monopoly, or perfect competition2.1 Show the firm's performance and dependance in the market3.0 Analysis3.1 Talk about the structure of the market3.2 Usethe payoff matrix (any other visuals should be included if necessary, including graphs)4.0 Conclusions or limitations5.0 References (must be reliable and must include in-text citations)
Microeconomic Analysis Report (1) Microeconomic Analysis Report (1) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcome Assessment Criteria 1 Understand the concepts from the lectures 12.5 Pts High Distinction Includes all components and exceeds all requirements indicated in the instructions. All parts of the assignment task are addressed thoroughly. 9.38 Pts Distinction Response includes all components and meets all requirements indicated in the instructions. Each question or part of the assignment is addressed. 8.13 Pts Credit Includes all components and meets all requirements indicated in the instructions. Some parts of the assignment task are addressed more effectively than others. 6.88 Pts Pass Missing some components and/or does not fully meet the requirements indicated in the instructions. Some parts of the assignment task are addressed minimally, inadequately and/or not at all. 0.0 Pts NN Missing essential components and/or does not meet the requirements indicated in the instructions. Many parts of the assignment task are addressed minimally, inadequately and/or not at all. 12.5 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcome Assessment Criteria 2 Apply the appropriate concepts to the question(s) 12.5 Pts High Distinction Demonstrates thorough and logical reasoning. Arguments are insightful and well supported. Analysis shows genuine engagement with the course material. Clear, detailed examples are provided, as applicable. 9.38 Pts Distinction Demonstrates logical and convincing reasoning. Arguments are well supported. Appropriate examples are provided, as applicable. 8.13 Pts Credit Displays some logical reasoning, although in places analysis may be predictable and/or not fully developed. Some attempts to support arguments. Some examples are provided, as applicable. 6.87 Pts Pass Contains insufficient analysis. Relies on summary, lists or descriptions instead of analysis. Arguments are unsupported or supported with flawed evidence. Examples, when applicable, are not provided or are not relevant. 0.0 Pts NN Lacks coherent analysis. Displays very simplistic response to the assignment task. Arguments are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples, when applicable, are not provided. 12.5 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcome Assessment Criteria 3 conduct systematic analysis using the concepts 12.5 Pts High Distinction Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the course material, going beyond the obvious or class discussions. 9.38 Pts Distinction Demonstrates a clear understanding of the course material, but may lack the insightful perspective of an HD 8.13 Pts Credit Demonstrates basic understanding of the course material, but may not contain insight. 6.88 Pts Pass Demonstrates some misunderstanding and/or oversimplification of the course material. 0.0 Pts NN Demonstrates major misunderstand or lack of or no understanding of the course material. 12.5 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcome Assessment Criteria 4 Engage in critical discussion; and draw conclusions 12.5 Pts High Distinction Writing is clear, concise and well organised, with excellent sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There are no more than three spelling, grammar or syntax errors per page of writing. Keeps to word limit. References and word count provided. 9.38 Pts Distinction Writing is mostly clear, concise and well organised with good sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There are no more than three spelling, grammar or syntax errors per page of writing. Keeps to word limit. References and word count provided. 8.13 Pts Credit Writing is mostly clear, concise and well organised with good sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There are no more than five spelling, grammar, or syntax errors per page of writing. Significantly exceeds word limit. References and word count not provided. 6.88 Pts Pass Writing is unclear and/or disorganised. Thoughts are not expressed in a logical manner. There are more than five spelling, grammar, or syntax errors per page of writing. Significantly exceeds word limit. References and/or word count not provided. 0.0 Pts NN Writing is unclear and disorganised. Thoughts ramble and make little sense. There are numerous spelling, grammar, or syntax errors throughout the response. Significantly exceeds word limit. References and/or word count not provided. 12.5 pts Total points: 50.0