1 | P a g e HI5019 SIS INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT T1 2018 HOLMES INSTITUTE FACULTY OF HIGHER EDUCATION Assignment 1 (Literature Review) Individual Assignment HI5019 STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS T1 2018...

1 answer below »
Attached


1 | P a g e HI5019 SIS INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT T1 2018 HOLMES INSTITUTE FACULTY OF HIGHER EDUCATION Assignment 1 (Literature Review) Individual Assignment HI5019 STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS T1 2018 WEEK 6 Friday 5 pm Each student will write a literature review of NOT more than 2500 words. The review should demonstrate that the student has thoroughly researched their topic. Students should use examples of business practice from the scholarly journals papers, conferences, books and professional magazines to support their arguments The literature review would be on an organisation (company) that is using accounting software packages in Australia. The research would cover: PART 1 1. The current organizational structure 2. What operational problems (e.g., inefficiency, errors) do you think the organisation could experience because of this structure? 3. What is the most likely system acquisition method— commercial software, custom software, or ERP? 4. Describes and prepare a system flowchart of the sales procedures for the chosen organisation (company) 5. Identify any control problems in the system and what sorts of fraud are possible in this system? PART 2 1. Development and adoption of the accounting software packages, 2. The current market size, 3. Identify the leaders in the market and what gives them the competitive advantage, 4. Identify the current gaps or challenges encountered by users or customers of accounting software/packages and make relevant suggestions or recommendations. 2 | P a g e HI5019 SIS INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT T1 2018 Submission Requirements: Research reports are to be presented in size 12 Times New Roman or 10 Calibri Font and double spaced. The research should include a list of at least 5 references used in the research report and a bibliography of the wider reading done to familiarize oneself with the topic. Submission:  Soft copy to self-check and Final Submission with cover sheet You are reminded to read the “Plagiarism” section of the course description. Your research should be a synthesis of ideas from a variety of sources expressed in your own words. All reports must use the Harvard referencing style. Marking rubrics are attached. Assessment Criteria: Score Very Good (12-15) Good (9-11) Satisfactory (8-10) Unsatisfactory (5-7) Presentation and writing style /15 marks Information is well organized. Correct layout including times new roman, font size 12 or calibri, font size10, double spaced. About the right length. Very well written, excellent paraphrasing and proper grammar and punctuation are used throughout. Information is organized, Correct layout including times new roman, font size 12 or calibri, font size10, double spaced. About the right length. Well written, some paraphrasing and proper grammar and punctuation Information is somewhat organized, Some elements of layout or length incorrect. Proper grammar and punctuation mostly used, but overuse of direct quotes. Information is poorly organized, Some elements of layout or length incorrect. Proper grammar and punctuation not always used. Excessive overuse of direct quotes Score Very Good (12-15) Good (9-11) Satisfactory (8-10) Unsatisfactory (5-7) Introduction /15 marks Introduces the topic of the research report in an extremely engaging manner which arouses the reader's interest. Gives a detailed general background and indicates the overall "plan". Introduces the topic of the research report in an engaging manner which arouses the reader's interest. Gives some general background and indicates the overall "plan" of the report. Satisfactorily introduces the topic of the research report. Gives a general background. Indicates the overall "plan" of the report. Introduces the topic of the research report, but omits a general background of the topic and/or the overall "plan" of the report. Score Very Good (17-20) Good (13-16) Satisfactory (10-12) Unsatisfactory (6-9) Evidence of Research /20 marks Substantial range of appropriate and current, supportive evidence Good range of appropriate and current, supportive evidence. Suitable range of supportive evidence used. Not always appropriate and/or current. Minimum cited. Insufficient range or number of supportive evidence used. 3 | P a g e HI5019 SIS INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT T1 2018 Score Very Good (25-30) Good (20-24) Satisfactory (15-19) Unsatisfactory (9-14) Development of Discussion /30 marks Logical, insightful, original discussion with well- connected paragraphs. Evidence of full engagement with the literature found, with relevant and detailed analysis. Detailed, original discussion develops logically with some connection between adjoining paragraphs. Understanding of reading shown. Some relevant analysis. Adequate discussion develops logically. Understanding of reading shown. Few relevant analysis. Inadequate discussion of issues and/or lacking in logical flow Little/no demonstrated understanding of reading. None/little discussion or analysis. Score Very Good (9-10) Good (7-8) Satisfactory (5-6) Unsatisfactory (3-4) Conclusion /10 marks An interesting, well written summary of the main points. An excellent final comment on the subject, based on the information provided. A good summary of the main points. A good final comment on the subject, based on the information provided. Satisfactory summary of the main points. A final comment on the subject, but introduced new material. Poor/no summary of the main points. A poor final comment on the subject and/or new material introduced. Score Very Good (9-10) Good (7-8) Satisfactory (5-6) Unsatisfactory (3-4) Referencing /10 marks Correct referencing (Harvard) All quoted material in quotes and acknowledged. All paraphrased material acknowledged. Correctly set out reference list and bibliography included. Mostly correct referencing (Harvard) All quoted material in quotes and acknowledged. All paraphrased material acknowledged. Mostly correct setting out reference list and bibliography included. Mostly correct referencing (Harvard) Some problems with quoted material and paraphrased material Some problems with the reference list or bibliography. Not all material correctly acknowledged. Some problems with the reference list or bibliography. Total /100 marks Final marks /20 General Comments:
Answered Same DayMay 09, 2020HI5019

Answer To: 1 | P a g e HI5019 SIS INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT T1 2018 HOLMES INSTITUTE FACULTY OF HIGHER EDUCATION...

Sangeeta answered on May 12 2020
139 Votes
Introduction
To start with, the suitable accounting software could prove to be a time and money saving and valuable tool (Laudon, 2017). However, with more than sixty diverse tools present within Australia, recognizing the most appropriate system is not that easy task. Frequently, it is vital to choose an application, which is simple in terms of management and is suitable for the business and keeps one informed about the newest innovations (Allahyari, 2012). Additionally, whether one is expanding the present business, merging some ne
w corporation into an already prevailing system, or looking for some accounting software for seeking out business workload, it’s highly significant to look for professional guidance prior to executing any new system into the business (Laudon, 2017). Moreover, there prevails an extreme war being waged over the SMEs of Australia; the prize is regarded as the sector where more than 70 percent of the Australians owning businesses are making use of accounting software packages (Allahyari, 2012).
Additionally, Commercial banks within Australia are placed at the forefront in adopting this software and are also motivating SMEs to adopt the same. Specially, the Xero accounting software has spread its mark within Australia with a contract with one among the renowned financial institutions of Australia i.e. the Commonwealth Bank (Laudon, 2017). Additionally, the Wellington-developed accounting software signed agreements with the Commonwealth Bank for bringing the lenders of Australia into growing “financial web of Xero.” Moreover, the Commonwealth Bank makes use of Xero accounting software for the purpose of storage, gathering and lastly, processing of invoices, bills and receipts as simple and cost-efficient as probable (Laudon, 2017). Moving ahead, such award-winning accounting software is adopted in the bank for the purpose of enhancing the services quality it offers to the clients. The integrated amalgamation amid the software provider and the bank makes sure real-time accounts payable along with the expense data flows direct in the bank books. Undoubtedly, competition is rising within the Australian software sector. The greatest percentage of accounting software users within Australia are the middle and small sized companies (Allahyari, 2012).
Further, taking the above discussion into consideration this particular paper attempts to examine an organisation i.e. Qantas Australia, which is making use of accounting software packages. The Qantas airline isn’t just the oldest airlines operating within Australia nevertheless it is also the third oldest even now operating airlines worldwide (Qantas, 2018). Qantas began its functional activities procedures during the year 1920 being a domestic passenger airline and began its global services during the year 1935 (Qantas, 2018). The airline has been quite successful in retaining its brand image for about a period of century and even now is regarded as being one among the highly preferred airlines among the Australian people and worldwide (Qantas, 2018). Likewise, this particular report would lay emphasis upon the accounting system adopted at Qantas for implementing and maintaining its accounting and financial transactions across international, domestic, cargo facilities and other subsidiary business services under Qantas brand (Qantas, 2018).
Part 1
1.    The current organizational structure:
For properly understanding the current organizational structure of Qantas airline, one must first of all comprehend its business operating products along with their subsidiaries that implement the procedures in link with Qantas Airlines (Qantas, 2018). The airline offers international and domestic passenger provisions to the clients globally. It is also a fraction of the fleet provisions that would carry couriers and cargo from one region to some other. Qantas also operates the express ground handling provision for itself and other regional and small airline services that they could not manage themselves (Qantas, 2018).
Moving ahead, the organizational model of Qantas is quite multifaceted in nature as well as decentralized. At Qantas, the decision-forming power is allocated to the relevant managers and the top management of the particular subsidiaries for ensuring that speedy decision-forming procedure is implemented. The top executives of the company are accountable for the strategic and vital decision-forming for Qantas; nevertheless, the managers are permitted to form their decision taking into consideration the prevailing situation (Qantas, 2018). The Airline follows a separate functional organizational framework for each subsidiary for the purpose of maintaining transparent and clear allocation of authorities and responsibilities. Such multifaceted organizational arrangement at times results in delay in the decision-forming procedure during few highly critical situations.
What operational problems (e.g., inefficiency, errors) do you think the organisation could experience because of this structure?
The company is implementing diverse functional practices and must make sure that it is capable of executing its procedures with slightest errors and highest correctness. There are several operational issues that Qantas could face because of the organization structure will be chiefly related to interruption during the decision-forming procedure...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here