Aassessment Brief_SBM1103_S2 2019_.pdfITS A PART 3 PRESENTATIONand part 1 n 2, I have completed by u guys only so do only part 3 no confusion please
Page | 1 Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Unit Code and Title: SBM1103 Project and Program Information & Communication Systems Assessment Overview Assessment Task Weighti ng Due Length ULO Assessment 1: Online Quiz MCQ covering the basic concepts of PMBOK@ communication processes. 10% Week 3 30 mins ULO-1 Assessment 2: Portfolio A submission of requirements specification, design and proposal for ICT acquisition for a project. 50% Week 12 3500 – 4000 words ULO-1 ULO-2 ULO-3 Assessment 3: Examination Examination covering theory and practice in the course. 40% Week 14 2 hours ULO-1 ULO-2 ULO-3 ULO-4 Assessment 1: Online Quiz Due date: Week 3 Group/individual: Individual Word count / Time provided: 30 minutes Weighting: 10% Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-1 Assessment Details: Online quiz is covering the basic concepts of PMBOK@ communication processes. For successful completion of the quiz, you are required to study the material provided (lecture slides, tutorials, and reading materials), engage in the unit’s activities, and in the discussion forums. By completing this assessment successfully, you will be able to identify key aspects of scope management as per best project management practices. This will then help in achieving ULO1. The quiz will be completed online through the APIC Online Learning System (OLS). Assessment Details Page | 2 Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Assessment 2: Portfolio Due date: Week 12 Group/individual: Group assignment Word count / Time provided: 3500 -4000 words Weighting: 50% Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO-1, ULO-2, ULO-3 Course Learning Outcomes: CLO-1, CLO-4, CLO-6, CLO-7, CLO-8 Assessment Details: Marking Information: The Portfolio will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 10% of the total unit mark. The Portfolio is divided in to three parts: Design Specification Report Design Proposal Report Perform Test Plan Walkthrough In the first part, produce a report detailing the system requirements specification for Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in a project (1000‐1200 words). This is a group task where the members in the team can examine the literature to source relevant information for the analysis and integration of business processes. The purpose of this assignment is to produce a proposal for a CPO that outlines the main system requirements for an Information System (IS) solution in a project. In the second part, generate a baseline report for a proposed IS system in a project. The report must contain a business continuity plan, suitable performance metrics and KPIs (1500‐1800 words). The results from the above RSR are analysed and the students can now combine their effort to create the design for the proposed IS system. The design must include suitable workflows and swim lanes for business processes, performance metrics, and functional and non‐functional decomposition of the system components such as availability, security, and infrastructure. Consideration for different options for the system architecture must be provided. For example, a cloud solution with service level agreement (SLA). In the final part, create and execute a test plan for your proposed design (1500‐1800 words). Students need to test the proposed design, carry out a performance test and a business continuity plan. The design may include a web‐based project management tool, a Portal design for project, Service catalogue and SLA for cloud solutions. Data for simulation of performance using suitable metrics and if necessary, data conversion. Part 1 (15% marks: submission 10% + presentation 5%) A brief literature review detailing the ICT requirements for a Project Management Information System and select an organisation to explore this further. Conduct a brief analysis of your chosen organisation’s business processes. Based on your analysis, propose the design and development of a new web-based project management tool or a Portal for managing projects in your chosen organisation. Provide justification for your chosen tool. Word limit: 1000-1200 words (excluding references and appendix) Page | 3 Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D Presentation 5% (due week 4 – week 5, during tutorial) Penalty for Late submission: a deduction of 5% of the total mark shall be imposed on each of the next subsequent days. Marking Criteria and Rubric for Part 1 Submission: The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 10% of the total unit mark Marking Criteria Not satisfactory (0-49%) of the criterion mark) Satisfactory (50-64%) of the criterion mark Good (65-74%) of the criterion mark Very Good (75-84%) of the criterion mark Excellent (85-100%) of the criterion mark The report is structured and provides a comprehensive analysis of the business processes for the project case (30%) The report shows limited structure and insufficient analysis of the main objectives. It shows insufficient details of the business processes for the project case. The report has addressed the main objectives. There is some supporting literature with limited interpretation of the project case and business processes. Referenced critical analysis of the business processes was largely missing. The report has addressed the main objectives. Evidence of literature supporting the interpretation of the business processes for the project case was present. Referenced critical analysis of the business process modelling was attempted not best practise The report has thoroughly addressed the main objectives. There is strong reference to supporting literature in the interpretation of the business processes for the project case and modelling of same. Indicates a sense of significant synthesis, of the business processes in the project case. Evidence of independent research, clearly enunciated definitions and a validation of ‘best practice’ modelling for business processes was demonstrated. The report has fully and creatively addressed all the main objectives. Referencing of supporting literature in the modelling of the business processes for the project case, used is rigorous and enlightening. Indicates independent strongly argued coherent evidenced modelling with strong recommendations for ‘best practice’ implementation. Ideas and content are presented coherently and the review is presented (25%) The report demonstrates a limited sense of purpose or theme and insufficient understanding The report has attempted to define the topic. An evidence-based approach is attempted but does not go far Ideas are reasonably clear but could exhibit greater cohesion. The reader can deduce the line of argument but Ideas are explained thoroughly to support development of the arguments of the review. Ideas are clear and insightful. The reader understands the argument through the precise presentation Recommendation s including functions, workflows, KPIs, metrics and system There is insufficient evidence of any understanding of a RFP plan There are few recommendations and few metrics included in the RFP. There is limited coherence in the plan or evidence that there has been Satisfactory understanding of theory that has been exhibited in the work, and appropriately demonstrated in the Comprehensive understanding of theory has been exhibited in the work. Detailed Demonstrates advanced capacity to extend and to create new tools as recommendations for new RFP with all Page | 4 Asia Pacific International College Pty Ltd. Trading as Asia Pacific International College 55 Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008: 02-9318 8111 PRV12007; CRICOS 03048D components are outlined in RFP (30%) and its contents. meaningful engagement with the task. recommendations and RFP outlined in the plan. analysis shown in RFP design. Demonstrates synthesis and capability. recommendations transparently described and detailed metrics included. According to the APA referencing style (15%) of the topic. Information is limited, unclear and the depth is not adequately developed. The idea is a simple restatement of the topic. The presentation and referencing shows insufficient application of the appropriate APA style guide and format. enough in expanding key issues. The reader is left with questions. It requires further information to clarify main arguments. The presentation and referencing shows some application of the appropriate APA style guide and format. may need to interpret. The presentation and referencing mostly conforms to the appropriate APA style guide and format. Accurate detail is used to support the main ideas and convince the reader of the argument who is left in no doubt of the purpose. The presentation and referencing conforms to the appropriate APA style guide and format. and perceives a sense of the wider context of the ides. he presentation and referencing is appropriate and consistent with the APA style guide and format. Comments