apa7th style continuation of previous assignment
PUBH6013_Assessment_3B_Investigation_Report_Week_11 Page 1 of 4 ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title PUBH6013: Qualitative Research Methods Assessment Assessment 3B: Investigation Presentation Individual/Group Individual Length 500 words (+/-10%) Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following learning outcomes: c) Apply qualitative research methods through undertaking data collection through, e.g. focus group, interviews, observational methods d) Appreciate cultural and ethical considerations for qualitative research in Public Health e) Understand sampling techniques, bias and rigour as they apply to qualitative research f) Apply coding and analysis techniques to qualitative data Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Week 12 Weighting 10% Total Marks 100 marks Context: This assessment involves preparing a report with data analysis/discussion of interviews and a brief presentation. There are two steps for this assignment. Part A involves writing a report and Part B involves a 10 minute presentation in class. Assessment 3B advances skills in presenting the rationale, process, and results of a qualitative project. Key understanding includes how to present key information from their project design and results in a concise and effective fashion, and how to deliver a presentation effectively. The assessment prepares students for an important task common to the public health practitioner role. Instructions: Summarise your research question, methods, interview process, data analysis and results in a 5 minute presentation. You can use the presentation mode of your choice ie PowerPoint, Prezi. PUBH6013_Assessment_3B_Investigation_Report_Week_11 Page 2 of 4 Note: Online students may find PowerPoint easier to use, as it allows you to record narration to each slide. Submit Part A by uploading them via the Assessment 3 submission portal in Blackboard. On-campus students will submit Part B through an in-class presentation. Online students will submit Part B by uploading their recorded presentation to the relevant forum thread in Blackboard. Assessment Criteria: • Understands the purpose of the presentation, and includes the content required in a professional manner (40%) • Effective presentation skills (60%) PUBH6013_Assessment_3B_Investigation_Report_Week_11 Page 3 of 4 Learning Rubrics Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) Pass (Functional) Credit (Proficient) Distinction (Advanced) High Distinction (Exceptional) Grade Description (Grading Scheme) Evidence of unsatisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning objectives of the course, insufficient understanding of the course content and/or unsatisfactory level of skill development. Evidence of satisfactory achievement of course learning objectives, the development of relevant skills to a competent level, and adequate interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a good level of understanding, knowledge and skill development in relation to the content of the course or work of a superior quality on the majority of the learning objectives of the course. Demonstration of a high level of interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a high level of achievement of the learning objectives of the course demonstrated in such areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, use of methodology and communication skills. Evidence of an exceptional level of achievement of learning objectives across the entire content of the course demonstrated in such areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, creativity, originality, use of methodology and communication skills. Understands the purpose of the presentation, and includes the content required in a professional manner Does not meet minimum standard Demonstrates no awareness of context and/or purpose of presentation. Meets minimum standard Demonstrates limited awareness of context and/or purpose of presentation. Moves beyond minimum standard Demonstrates consistent awareness of context and/or purpose of presentation. Exceeds minimum standard Demonstrates an advanced and integrated understanding of context and/or purpose of presentation. Exceeds minimum standard and exhibits high levels of independence Consistently demonstrates a systematic and critical understanding of context and purpose of presentation. http://www.tua.edu.au/media/50742/a240_grading-scheme.pdf PUBH6013_Assessment_3B_Investigation_Report_Week_11 Page 4 of 4 40% Effective presentation skills 60% Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence. No effort is made to keep audience engaged, audience cannot follow the line of reasoning. Little use of presentation aids, or the presentation aids and material used are irrelevant. Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. Attempts are made to keep the audience engaged, but not always successful. Line of reasoning is often difficult to follow. Presentation aids are used more for effect than relevance. Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. The audience is mostly engaged, line of reasoning is easy to follow. Effective use of presentation aids. Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented, the presentation is logical, clear and well supported by evidence. Engages the audience, demonstrates cultural sensitivity. Carefully and well prepared presentations aids are used. Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments. Engages and sustains audience’s interest in the topic, demonstrates high levels of cultural sensitivity Effective use of diverse presentation aids, including graphics and multi- media. PUBH6013_Assessment_3A_Investigation_Report_Week_11 Page 1 of 5 ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title PUBH6013: Qualitative Research Methods Assessment Assessment 3A: Investigation Report Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words (+/-10%) Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following learning outcomes: c) Apply qualitative research methods through undertaking data collection through, e.g. focus group, interviews, observational methods d) Appreciate cultural and ethical considerations for qualitative research in Public Health e) Understand sampling techniques, bias and rigour as they apply to qualitative research f) Apply coding and analysis techniques to qualitative data Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Week 11 Weighting 30% Total Marks 100 marks Context: This assessment involves preparing a report with data analysis/discussion of interviews and a brief presentation. There are two steps for this assignment. Part A involves writing a report and Part B involves a 10 minute presentation in class. Assessment 3A advances skills in analysing and reporting qualitative data, and reflexivity of practice. Key understanding includes how to generate meaning from qualitative data, how to report the results of qualitative analysis, and how to reflect on one’s own performance to identify strengths and opportunities for growth. The assessment prepares students for an important task common to the public health practitioner role. Instructions: Analysis: Use the resources in module six to: 1. Code the data that you collect from your interviewees. 2. Develop themes based on your coding. PUBH6013_Assessment_3A_Investigation_Report_Week_11 Page 2 of 5 3. Report on the themes that you’ve identified, supported by relevant quotes from your interviewees. Report this part in the same style as the results section of a qualitative journal article. Reflection: reflect on your experience of interviewing and analysing the data. What did you do well, and what did you struggle with? What could you learn to do better? What did you learn through this experience? Transcripts: All students MUST submit their interview transcripts as Appendices at the end of their report. Reports submitted without interview transcripts will not be graded. Assessment Criteria: • Ability to interpret and analyse data, and report the results appropriately (50%) • Reflection upon the interview experience and demonstrates reflexivity (30%) • Use of academic conventions (20%) PUBH6013_Assessment_3A_Investigation_Report_Week_11 Page 3 of 5 Learning Rubrics Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) Pass (Functional) Credit (Proficient) Distinction (Advanced) High Distinction (Exceptional) Grade Description (Grading Scheme) Evidence of unsatisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning objectives of the course, insufficient understanding of the course content and/or unsatisfactory level of skill development. Evidence of satisfactory achievement of course learning objectives, the development of relevant skills to a competent level, and adequate interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a good level of understanding, knowledge and skill development in relation to the content of the course or work of a superior quality on the majority of the learning objectives of the course. Demonstration of a high level of interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a high level of achievement of the learning objectives of the course demonstrated in such areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, use of methodology and communication skills. Evidence of an exceptional level of achievement of learning objectives across the entire content of the course demonstrated in such areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, creativity, originality, use of methodology and communication skills. Reflection upon the interview experience and demonstrates reflexivity 30% Does not meet minimum standard Demonstrates no awareness of context and/or purpose of reflection in practice. Meets minimum standard Demonstrates limited awareness of context and/or purpose of reflection in practice. Moves beyond minimum standard Demonstrates consistent awareness of context and/or purpose reflection in practice. Exceeds minimum standard Demonstrates an advanced and integrated understanding of context and/or purpose of reflection in practice. Exceeds minimum standard and exhibits high levels of independence Consistently demonstrates a systematic and critical understanding of context and purpose of reflection in practice. http://www.tua.edu.au/media/50742/a240_grading-scheme.pdf PUBH6013_Assessment_3A_Investigation_Report_Week_11 Page 4 of 5 Ability to interpret and analyse data, and report the results appropriately 50% Limited synthesis and analysis. Limited application/recommendations based upon analysis. Makes assertions that