Thanks
Assessment Information COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. Assessment Information 3 Subject Code: HAT201 Subject Name: Introduction to Hospitality and Tourism Assessment Title: Length: Case Study Analysis 1500 (+/- 10% allowable range) Weighting: 40% Total Marks: Submission: 100 Online via Turnitin Due Date: Week 13 . Your task Individually, you are required to conduct an analysis of ethical and governing problems based on a real tourism case. Assessment Description . The purpose of this individual case study analysis is to further your skills in applying relevant Hospitality and Tourism analysis tools. It will also test your ability to identify a range of Hospitality and Tourism related problems, and its ethical implications on local communities. This will enable you to apply ethical standards to a variety of situations arising in the Hospitality and Tourism Context. Assessment Instructions To start your assessment, watch the following documentary about overtourism in Venice, Italy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHNWZ018ln8. Based on the presented information in this documentary, you are required to: • Identify and discuss the prime ethical and governing issues presented in the documentary. • Identify and discuss who should be responsible for rectifying issues that you have identified? Why? Explain your reasoning. • Discuss how the Italian government could have resolved identified issues. Justify your answer. • Suggest at least three recommendations to overcome such issues in the future by providing examples from other countries that have successfully managed overtourism related issues. You are required to use at least 8 sources of information that are referenced in accordance with Kaplan Harvard Referencing Guide. These may include corporate websites, government publications, industry reports, census data, journal articles, and newspaper articles. Wikipedia and other ‘popular’ sites are not to be used. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHNWZ018ln8 Assessment Information COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. Assessment Submission This file must be submitted as a ‘Word’ document to avoid any technical issues that may occur from incorrect file format upload. Uploaded files with a virus will not be considered as a legitimate submission. Turnitin will notify you if there is an issue with the submitted file. In this case, you must contact your lecturer via email and provide a brief description of the issue and a screenshot of the Turnitin error message. You are also encouraged to submit your work well in advance of the deadline to avoid any possible delay with the Turnitin similarity report or any other technical difficulties. Late assignment submission penalties Penalties will be imposed on late assignment submissions in accordance with Kaplan Business School “late assignment submission penalties” policy. Number of days Penalty 1* - 9 days 5% per day for each calendar day late deducted from the total marks available 10 - 14 days 50% deducted from the total marks available. After 14 days Assignments that are submitted more than 14 calendar days after the due date will not be accepted, and the student will receive a mark of zero for the assignment(s). Note Notwithstanding the above penalty rules, assignments will also be given a mark of zero if they are submitted after assignments have been returned to students *Assignments submitted at any stage within the first 24 hours after the deadline will be considered to be one day late and therefore subject to the associated penalty For more information, please read the full policy via the following link: https://www.kbs.edu.au/wpcontent/uploads/2016/07/KBS_FORM_Assessment-Policy_MAR2018_FA.pdf https://www.kbs.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/KBS_FORM_Assessment-Policy_MAR2018_FA.pdf Assessment Information COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. Important Study Information Academic Integrity Policy KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy. What is academic integrity and misconduct? What are the penalties for academic misconduct? What are the late penalties? How can I appeal my grade? Click here for answers to these questions: http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/. Word Limits for Written Assessments Submissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded. Study Assistance Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information. http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/ https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481 COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. HAT201 Assessment 3 Marking Rubric – Case Study Analysis 40% Marking Criteria NN (Fail) 0 – 49% P (Pass) 50 – 64% CR (Credit) 65 – 74% DN (Distinction) 75 – 84% HD (High Distinction) 85 – 100% Analysis of identified issues __/30 marks Your analysis lacks depth, and your interpretation is not relevant to the assessment criteria. You briefly analyse some of the issues, and your interpretation is not always relevant to the assessment criteria. You analyse most of the issues, and your interpretation is well structured. You analyse and interpret issues thoroughly. You analyse and interpret the issues articulately and convincingly. Recommendations __/30 marks The quality of your recommendations is poor and/or incoherent with no examples. You have drawn partially useful recommendations supported by some examples. You have drawn mostly useful recommendations, supported by valid examples. You have drawn convincing recommendations, supported by valid examples. You have drawn comprehensive and convincing recommendations, supported by a wide range of valid examples. Use of sources/supportive evidence __20 marks Your research lacks focus because of an unsuitable choice of sources. You have selected some appropriate sources. Better use of quality sources would help focus your research. Your research is focused, drawn from an appropriate range of sources. It is obvious that your research is focused, complemented by a quality selection and range of sources. It is clearly obvious that your research is extensive and focused, complemented by a quality selection and range of sources. Format __/20 marks Total marks __/100 Spelling and/or grammar is consistently incorrect, impacting on the flow and readability of your analysis. The format chosen for your analysis lacks thought and consideration for the intended audience. In-text referencing and/or reference list is mostly incorrect or non-existent. Even though grammar and spelling are an issue, they do not detract very much from the readability of your analysis. The format chosen for your analysis is appropriate, but major improvements would enhance its presentation. In-text referencing and the resultant reference list adheres to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style, with major errors. Mostly correct grammar and spelling are very good but with occasional errors. The format chosen for your analysis is appropriate, but some improvements would enhance its presentation.