6 |
Scientific knowledge: Toxicology (Topic related)
(Linked to learning outcome 1)
|
Impressive (6 pts)
The topic has been accurately and professionally described. Correctly applied the toxicology key knowledge relating to the topic.
|
Proficient (5 pts)
The topic has been described. Developed the toxicology knowledge relating to the topic.
|
Progressing (4 pts)
The topic has been fairly addressed. Demonstrated the basic knowledge requiring to this topic.
|
Developing (3 pts)
The topic has been scantly addressed. Not clearly applied the toxicology knowledge to solve the issue.
|
Basic (2 pts)
The topic has not been addressed clearly.
|
Weak (1 pts)
The topic has not been addressed. Confused message.
|
6 |
Scientific accuracy and critical thinking
(Linked to learning outcome 2)
|
Impressive (6 pts)
Very clear, comprehensive and excellent discussion of the toxicology part of the chosen drug, and its target(s).
Excellent solid research has been identified to discuss the mechanism of action.
|
Proficient (5 pts)
Clear, comprehensive and very good discussion of the toxicology part of the chosen drug, and its target(s).
Some solid research has been identified to discuss the mechanism of action.
|
Progression (4 pts)
Limited discussion of the toxicology part of this drug, and its target(s).
The view of previous studies is presented, but a little critical analysis of the outcome.
|
Developing (3 pts)
Limited discussion of the toxicology part of the chosen drug, and its target(s). Information is often inaccurate.
The view of previous studies is presented with only a vague original thought.
|
Basic (2 pts)
Insufficient discussion and confused message. Some information is not correct and limited research.
|
Weak (1 pts)
The toxicology part of the specific drug and its target(s) have not been discussed. Information is often inaccurate.
Scantly researched with no real outcome of solving the issue.
|
3 |
Application: Communicate this knowledge
(Linked to learning outcome 3)
|
Impressive (3pts)
a) The document demonstrated excellent written communication skills with appropriate research. Well constructed.
b) References effectively integrated into the text to support the point being made. Accurately referenced.
|
Proficient (2.5 pts)
a) The document demonstrated clear communication skills and appropriate research.
b) References appropriately integrated in a satisfactory manner. Appropriate style of referencing with minimal errors.
|
Progressing (2 pts)
a) The document demonstrated mostly a range of suitable written communication skills with some errors.
b) References integrated into the text but not accurately cited. A number of errors.
|
Basic (1.5 pts)
a) The document demonstrated ineffective manner with some errors.
b) References poorly integrated into the text. Multiple errors throughout referencing style.
|
Weak 1 pts)
a) Communication in the entire document did not meet the standard level. Careless language choice plus poor spelling/grammar errors.
b) A few or no references. Careless use of referencing style.
|
N/A
|