Attached. Please finish the assignment and provide solution to every single tasks of the assignment and provide all the required documents such as excels and ppt and etc as per the assessment requirement. Thanks.
Student Assessment BSBHRM417 Student Assessment V1.0 September 2021 Page 1 of 14 Assessment Resource Summary Unit Details BSBHRM417 Support human resources functions and processes Assessment Methods Project Assessment Task 1 Project Assessment Task 2 Student Assessment BSBHRM417 Student Assessment V1.0 September 2021 Page 2 of 14 Unit Summary This unit describes the skills and knowledge required to support work across a range of human resource functional areas. The unit applies to individuals who require a broad understanding of human resource functions, associated policy frameworks and the administrative requirements to support these functions and policies. No licensing, legislative or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication. Prerequisite Units There are no mandatory pre-requisite units for this competency. Co-requisite Units There are no recommended co-requisite units for this competency. All products purchased remain the intellectual property of Sacred Heart International College. All rights reserved; no part of any publication provided by Sacred Heart International College may be reproduced by any means for use outside the purchasing organisation, without the prior written permission of Sacred Heart International College. Student Assessment BSBHRM417 Student Assessment V1.0 September 2021 Page 3 of 14 The Assessment Process and Student Rights & Responsibilities Submitting your Assessment Tasks: When you have completed your assessment, you will need to submit them, according to the instructions provided to you by your trainer/ assessor. This may either be through TURNITIN or email or by hand to the assigned trainer/assessor. You will be provided with a due date and you must make sure you submit your assessments in accordance with it. You may be required to apply for an extension if you require extra time, according to your SHIC policies and procedures. Make sure you keep a copy of your tasks before you submit them. SHIC will need to keep them as evidence and may not be able to return them to you. Task specific instructions can be found further in this document. Assessment Attempts and Resubmissions: You have up to three attempts to complete each assessment tasks satisfactorily. If after the third attempt, you have not completed a task satisfactorily, your assessor will have to mark your result for the unit as ‘Not Yet Competent’ (NYC). You will then have to discuss alternative arrangements for re-assessment with the intervention team. The alternative arrangement may even include the student re-enrolling in the unit, participating in additional training or attempting the task again at a later date, so that skills and knowledge can be consolidated. These arrangements will be in accordance with SHIC policies and procedures. When you are required to resubmit, you may be required to: resubmit incorrect answers to questions (such as for written tasks and case studies) resubmit all or part of a project, depending on how the error affects the overall outcome of the task redo a role-play after being provided with appropriate feedback about their original performance be observed a second (or third) time undertaking any tasks or activities that were not completed satisfactorily the first time, after being provided with appropriate feedback. When you are required to resubmit, you’ll be given a due date for your resubmission. All re-submissions will be conducted in accordance with the SHIC policies and procedures. Assessment Outcomes: Each assessment task will be given an outcome of either Competent (C) or Not Yet Competent (NYC). Students must complete all tasks for a unit satisfactorily to achieve an overall outcome of Competent (C) for a unit. If one or more tasks are assessed as Not Yet Competent, students will be given an overall outcome for the unit of Not Yet Competent (NYC). Plagiarism, Cheating and Collusion: Plagiarism, cheating and collusion on assessments is not acceptable. Any incidence of this is considered academic misconduct. The definitions of each of these are below. cheating – seeking to obtain an unfair advantage in the assessment of any piece of work plagiarism – to take and use the ideas and/or expressions and/or wording of another person or organisation and pass them off as your own by failing to give appropriate acknowledgement. This includes material from any sources, such as staff members, other students, authors, texts, resources and the internet, whether published or unpublished collusion – unauthorised collaboration between students. Where your assessor believes there has been an incident of academic misconduct involving plagiarism, cheating, and/or collusion, this will be addressed in line with the SHIC policies and procedures which may ultimately lead to an academic misconduct warning and you needing to complete the whole unit again. Assessment Appeals: If you don’t agree with an assessment decision made, you have the right to appeal it. You may need to lodge your request for an appeal within a certain amount of time from the original decision being made. You will need to make your appeal in writing and follow SHIC process for appeals. Refer to your Student Handbook for more information about our appeals process. Reasonable Adjustments: These can be made to ensure equity in assessment for people with disabilities. A legislative and regulatory framework underpins and supports the delivery of vocational education and Student Assessment BSBHRM417 Student Assessment V1.0 September 2021 Page 4 of 14 training across Australia. Under this framework, providers of vocational education and training must take steps to ensure that learners with recognised disabilities have the same learning opportunities and opportunities to perform and complete assessments as learners without disabilities. Adjustments include any changes to the assessment process or context that meet the individual needs of the person with a disability, but do not change competency outcomes. Sometimes reasonable adjustments are made to the learning environment, training delivery, learning resources and/or assessment tasks to accommodate the particular needs of a student with a disability. Your trainer/ assessor may also provide assistance / intervention during the assessments in the event that there is a risk of injury to the student or to the other members of the class. An adjustment is reasonable if it can accommodate the student’s particular needs while also taking into account factors such as: the views of the student the potential effect of the adjustment on the student and others the costs and benefits of making the adjustment. Making reasonable adjustments requires the RTO to balance the need for change with the expense or effort involved in making this change. If an adjustment requires a disproportionately high expenditure or disruption, it is not likely to be reasonable.1 Thus, if students are considered to have special needs, trainer/ assessors are allowed to provide reasonable adjustment in accordance with SHIC Policies and Procedures which means there may be modification to the way in which evidence is gathered. This could include alternative methods of assessment. However, it will not change the standards or outcomes the student achieves. Please discuss with your assessor if you believe a reasonable adjustment to an assessment task, method or process needs to be made on the basis of disability. Reasonable adjustments made for you will be recorded in the space provided in the checklist for the relevant task and in the Unit Assessment Record sheet. Information about Assessment Assessment: Assessment is ‘the process of collecting evidence and making judgements on whether competency has been achieved, to confirm that an individual can perform to the standard required in the workplace, as specified in a training package or VET accredited course’.2 Dimensions of Competency: To be competent, a person must show their ability to perform effectively in a broad capacity. The dimensions of competency ensure that the person being assessed has the skills to perform competently in a variety of different circumstances. To be competent, a person must demonstrate the following: Task skills – These are the skills that are needed to perform a task at an acceptable level. They are usually described in the performance criteria and include knowledge and practical skills. Task management skills – These are skills in organising and coordinating, which are needed to be able to work competently while managing a number of tasks or activities as part of a job. Contingency skills – These are the skills that are needed to respond and react appropriately to unexpected problems, changes in routine and breakdowns while also performing competently. Job role/environment skills – These are the skills that are needed to perform as expected in a particular job, position and location, and with others. These skills may be described in a range of variables and in the underpinning skills and knowledge. 1 Source: Innovation & Business Skills Australia. (2015). BSB business services training package: implementation guide. Retrieved from https://vetnet.gov.au/Public%20Documents/BSBv1.2%20Business%20Services%20Implementation%20Guide.pdf. 2 Source: Australian Skills Quality Authority. (2019). Users’ guide to the Standards for registered training organisations (RTOs) 2015. Retrieved from https://www.asqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-01/users_guide_to_the_standards_for_registered_training_organisations_rtos_2015_v2-2_0.pdf. © Australian Skills Quality Authority; www.asqa.gov.au. https://vetnet.gov.au/Public%20Documents/BSBv1.2%20Business%20Services%20Implementation%20Guide.pdf Student Assessment BSBHRM417 Student Assessment V1.0 September 2021 Page 5 of 14 Principles of Assessment and Rules of Evidence: Assessment must be conducted in accordance with the rules of evidence and principles of assessment. The following definitions of these terms are taken from the Australian Skills Quality Authority’s Users’ guide: standards for registered training organisations (RTOs) 2015. Principles of Assessment - Validity: ‘Any assessment decision of the RTO is justified, based on the evidence of performance of the individual learner. Validity requires: - assessment against the unit(s) of competency and the associated assessment requirements covers the broad range of skills and knowledge that are essential to competent performance - assessment of knowledge and skills is integrated with their