(comfort)
Enhancing health using digital resources
Your topic is Environmental pollution.
Bullet points and brief explanation
Definition and usefulness of the Environmental pollution
Southwark should be used as example and major point or topic
South involves different type of people
Appraise the impact of social cultural historical influence of life time behaviour
Example of pictures
Introduction:
|
It is widely recognised that contemporary lifestyle behaviour impacts on health and wellbeing and a number of methods can be used to enable behaviour change. A digital resource by nature has the potential to be accessed by a much wider audience hence improving the spread of the intended health promotion message.
|
Completion of this assignment will address the following learning outcomes:
|
|
|
|
|
Appraise the impact of social, cultural and historical influences on lifestyle behaviour and their implications on health and wellbeing
|
|
Only learning outcome three shouls be done.
Assessment Brief *This document is for CU Group students for their own use in completing their assessed work for this module and should not be passed to third parties or posted on any website. Any infringements of this rule should be reported to
[email protected] Module Title: Lifestyle Trends, Health and Behaviour Change Module Code: 227 HSCEL Assessment Type: Group Work Assessment Number: 1 Study Mode: Full-time Weighting: 40% Submission Date: 22/05/2020 Submission Time: 18:00 Introduction: It is widely recognised that contemporary lifestyle behaviour impacts on health and wellbeing and a number of methods can be used to enable behaviour change. A digital resource by nature has the potential to be accessed by a much wider audience hence improving the spread of the intended health promotion message. Completion of this assignment will address the following learning outcomes: 1 Analyse lifestyle behaviour in contemporary society and its impact on health and wellbeing of individuals and groups 2 Review the rationale for promoting positive lifestyle behaviour to improve health and well-being for individuals and society 3 Appraise the impact of social, cultural and historical influences on lifestyle behaviour and their implications on health and wellbeing Task: Group health education campaign digital resource (LO 1, 2 ,3) Enhancing health using digital resources Public health workers have a huge influence on health and wellbeing, individuals, groups and communities. As a group, you are required to a deliver a 10-15 minute’s presentation that demonstrates how digital resources can be used to enhance health. You are delivering your presentation to your local council representatives as part of a bid for funding for a community project. You are required to choose from one of the options. Your topic is either Drug addiction or Environmental pollution. Guidance notes and considerations Late Submission If you are not able to complete your coursework on time due to extenuating circumstances, the ONLY way to receive an extension (up to 5 working days) or a deferral (anything longer than 5 working days) is to contact a Registry team member located at your specific CU site. CU Coventry –
[email protected] CU London –
[email protected] CU Scarborough –
[email protected] * Extenuating circumstances are defined by CU as ‘genuine circumstances beyond your control or ability to foresee, and which seriously impair your assessed work’. * Please note that you will need to provide third party evidence to support your reasoning for requiring an extension or deferral. * Your course tutor is NOT able to approve an extension or a deferral, if you have not completed the official forms and had your request approved your work will count as not submitted and receive a zero mark. Plagiarism and Malpractice * You are encouraged to check the originality of your work by using the draft Turnitin links on your Moodle Web. * Collusion between students (where sections of your work are similar to the work submitted by other students in this or previous module cohorts) is taken extremely seriously and will be reported to the academic conduct panel. This applies to all coursework and exam answers. * A marked difference between your writing style, knowledge and skill level demonstrated in class discussion, any test conditions and that demonstrated in a coursework assignment may result in you having to undertake a Viva Voce in order to prove the coursework assignment is entirely your own work. * If you make use of the services of a proof reader in your work you must keep your original version and make it available as a demonstration of your written efforts. * You must not submit work for assessment that you have already submitted (partially or in full), either for your current course or for another qualification of this university, unless this is specifically provided for in your assignment brief or specific course or module information. Where earlier work by you is citable, ie. it has already been published/submitted, you must reference it clearly. Identical pieces of work submitted concurrently will also be considered to be self-plagiarism. Submission Guidelines There should be a title page which clearly identifies the following; * Name of the module * Title of the Assessment* Assessment number * Word count The word count identified includes quotations, but excludes the bibliography and unless specifically stated, encompasses a discrepancy of + or – 10%. Banding Knowledge and Understanding (30%) Analysis, Evaluation and Application of Theory (30%) Quality of Research (20%) Academic Presentation (20%) 90-100% Exceptional knowledge base exploring, analysing and evaluating the discipline and its theory with extraordinary originality and autonomy. Demonstrates an exceptional grasp of relevant analytical techniques, and the ability to apply these to new and/or abstract information and situations. Shows a highly developed appreciation of the limits and/or appropriate uses of particular analytical and evaluative approaches. Knowledge and understanding of theory, where relevant, is highly detailed. Exceptional appreciation of the limits of theory demonstrated throughout all assessment outcomes. Approach to assessment task is theoretically informed to an exceptional standard. Exceptional exploration of wider academic sources with a high degree of independent learning which exceeds the assignment brief. Sources have been accurately interpreted and integrated with flawless synthesis, leading to innovative and interesting ideas. With some adjustments, work may be considered for internal publication. Exceptional answer with coherent and logical presentation of ideas. The answer exhibits a clear argument/line of reasoning with flair and originality. Discipline specific vocabulary used with precision. No language errors present and oral communication fully captivates the audience through highly engaging resources and visual aids, if applicable, exceptionally high levels of eye contact and no reliance on notes. If applicable, exceptional responses are given to any questions posed. Referencing in the CU version of Harvard has been employed in an accurate manner. With some adjustments, work may be considered for internal publication. 80-89% Outstanding knowledge base exploring, analysing and evaluating the discipline and its theory with clear originality and autonomy. Demonstrates an outstanding grasp of relevant analytical and/or evaluative techniques. Shows a developed appreciation of the limits and/or appropriate uses of particular analytical and/or evaluative approaches. Knowledge and understanding of theory, where relevant, is detailed and sophisticated. Appreciation of the limits of theory demonstrated throughout the work. Approach to assessment task is clearly and appropriately theoretically informed. Outstanding exploration of wider academic sources with a high degree of independent learning which exceeds the assignment brief. Sources have been accurately interpreted and integrated with a high degree of synthesis, leading to innovative and interesting ideas. Outstanding answer with coherent and logical presentation of ideas. The answer exhibits a clear argument/line of reasoning with flair and originality. Discipline specific vocabulary used with precision. No language errors present and oral communication captivates the audience through engaging resources and visual aids, if applicable, outstanding levels of eye contact and little to no reliance on notes. If applicable, outstanding responses are given to any questions posed. Referencing in the CU version of Harvard has been employed in an accurate manner. 70-79% Excellent knowledge base that supports analysis and/or evaluation and problem-solving in theory and/or practice within the discipline, with considerable originality. Demonstrates a detailed, accurate, theoretical understanding. Appropriately selected theoretical knowledge is applied to the individual learning outcomes. Makes excellent use of established techniques of analysis and/or evaluation relevant to the discipline and applies these effectively. Shows developed ability to appraise alternative theories and/or analytic approaches, where relevant. Excellent exploration of wider academic sources with evidence of independent learning which may exceed the assignment brief. Sources have been accurately interpreted and integrated with an attempt made at synthesis, leading to interesting ideas. Excellent answer with coherent and logical presentation of ideas. The answer is entirely relevant and focused with a clear argument/line of reasoning throughout. Discipline specific vocabulary used with precision and oral communication captivates the audience through engaging resources and visual aids, if applicable, excellent levels of eye contact with minimal reliance on notes. If applicable, excellent responses are given to any questions posed. No language errors present. Referencing in the CU version of Harvard has been employed in an accurate manner. 60-69% Very good knowledge base that supports analysis and/or evaluation and problem-solving in theory and/or practice within the discipline, with some originality displayed. Makes very good use of established techniques of analysis and/or evaluation relevant to the discipline. Shows developing ability to compare alternative theories and/or analytic approaches, where relevant. Very good evidence of wider academic reading and independent learning. Sources have been accurately interpreted and integrated with some evidence of synthesis. Very good answer with coherent and logical presentation of ideas. The answer is relevant and focused. Discipline specific vocabulary is used. Minimal language errors may be present but do not impact on clarity of expression. Oral communication somewhat captivates the audience through resources and visual aids, if applicable, which are mostly engaging, very good levels of eye contact with only some reliance on notes. If applicable, very good responses are given to any questions posed. Referencing in the CU version of Harvard is accurate. 50-59% Good knowledge base that supports some analysis and/or evaluation and problem-solving in theory and/or practice within the discipline. Makes good of established techniques of analysis and/or evaluation, relevant to the discipline. Sound descriptive knowledge of key theories with some appropriate application. Good evidence of academic reading, with attempt at moving beyond the recommended texts. Interpretation of sources is acceptable with evidence of integration. Good answer with coherent and logical presentation. The answer is largely relevant but lacks focus at points. There is an attempt at using discipline specific vocabulary. Some language errors are present which impacts on clarity at times. Oral communication generally captivates the audience through resources and visual aids, if applicable, which are generally engaging, with good levels of eye contact but a noticeable reliance on notes. If applicable, good responses are given to any questions posed. Referencing in the CU version of Harvard is mostly accurate. 40-49% Satisfactory knowledge base demonstrating comprehension and formulation of basic knowledge with some omissions at the level of theoretical understanding. Limited ability to discuss theory and solve problems within the discipline. Makes satisfactory but limited use of established techniques of analysis and/or evaluation, relevant to the discipline. Selection of theory, if relevant to the assessment outcomes is satisfactory but application and/or understanding is limited. Satisfactory evidence of academic reading, with minimal attempt to move beyond the recommended texts. Interpretation of sources is acceptable, but there may be some instances of misunderstanding. Satisfactory answer with some attempt at coherence and logical presentation. The answer contains some irrelevant material and lacks focus at points. There is minimal use of discipline specific vocabulary. Some language errors may be present which impacts on clarity at times. Oral communication satisfactorily captures the audience, but resources and visual aids, if applicable, have clear areas for development. Eye contact with the audience is minimal and there is a strong reliance on