Criteria Excellent Good Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Poor Introduction and Parameter Justification The following is achieved perfectly. There is a clear, appropriate and specific topic. The...

1 answer below »
give me quote


Criteria Excellent Good Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Poor Introduction and Parameter Justification The following is achieved perfectly. There is a clear, appropriate and specific topic. The introduction is based on quality literature and clearly and concisely discusses the topic under investigation. The introduction naturally leads into the identification and justification of the parameters being investigated, as it relates to the topic. The following is achieved to a high standard. There is a clear, appropriate and specific topic. The introduction is based on quality literature and clearly and concisely discusses the topic under investigation. The introduction naturally leads into the identification and justification of the parameters being investigated, as it relates to the topic. Most of the following has been achieved. There is a clear, appropriate and specific topic. The introduction is based on quality literature and clearly and concisely discusses the topic under investigation. The introduction naturally leads into the identification and justification of the parameters being investigated, as it relates to the topic. Only some of the following has been achieved. There is a clear, appropriate and specific topic. The introduction is based on quality literature and clearly and concisely discusses the topic under investigation. The introduction naturally leads into the identification and justification of the parameters being investigated, as it relates to the topic. None or only a limited amount of the following has been achieved. There is a clear, appropriate and specific topic. The introduction is based on quality literature and clearly and concisely discusses the topic under investigation. The introduction naturally leads into the identification and justification of the parameters being investigated, as it relates to the topic. Data, sampling methodology and justification of the number of samples The following has been achieved perfectly. The methodology/experiment that the data originated from has been clearly explained. The quality of the data has been discussed in context to the topic. The number of samples used has been justified and appropriate error analysis has been performed. The following has been achieved to a high standard. The methodology/experiment that the data originated from has been clearly explained. The quality of the data has been discussed in context to the topic. The number of samples used has been justified and appropriate error analysis has been performed. Most of the following has been achieved. The methodology/experiment that the data originated from has been clearly explained. The quality of the data has been discussed in context to the topic. The number of samples used has been justified and appropriate error analysis has been performed. Only some of the following has been achieved. The methodology/experiment that the data originated from has been clearly explained. The quality of the data has been discussed in context to the topic. The number of samples used has been justified and appropriate error analysis has been performed. None or only a limited amount of the following has been achieved. The methodology/experiment that the data originated from has been clearly explained. The quality of the data has been discussed in context to the topic. The number of samples used has been justified and appropriate error analysis has been performed. Referencing and data limitations The following is achieved perfectly. The references used are appropriate and primarily from credible sources. The referencing is consistent and done using a well known referencing style (i.e. APA, IEEE, Harvard). The limitations of the data have been clearly discussed and the data has been properly linked to the literature in a discussion. The following is achieved to a high standard. The references used are appropriate and primarily from credible sources. The referencing is consistent and done using a well known referencing style (i.e. APA, IEEE, Harvard). The limitations of the data have been clearly discussed and the data has been properly linked to the literature in a discussion. Most of the following has been achieved. The references used are appropriate and primarily from credible sources. The referencing is consistent and done using a well known referencing style (i.e. APA, IEEE, Harvard). The limitations of the data have been clearly discussed and the data has been properly linked to the literature in a discussion. Only some of the following has been achieved. The references used are appropriate and primarily from credible sources. The referencing is consistent and done using a well known referencing style (i.e. APA, IEEE, Harvard). The limitations of the data have been clearly discussed and the data has been properly linked to the literature in a discussion. None or only a limited amount of the following has been achieved. The references used are appropriate and primarily from credible sources. The referencing is consistent and done using a well known referencing style (i.e. APA, IEEE, Harvard). The limitations of the data have been clearly discussed and the data has been properly linked to the literature in a discussion. Analysis of the collected data The following is achieved perfectly. The calculations have been well explained in a style appropriate to a report. The mean, standard deviation, co- efficient of variation and co- efficient of correlation have been calculated and have accompanying discussion. The distribution of the data has been shown graphical and has been discussed. The following is achieved to a high standard. The calculations have been well explained in a style appropriate to a report. The mean, standard deviation, co-efficient of variation and co-efficient of correlation have been calculated and have accompanying discussion. The distribution of the data has been shown graphical and has been discussed. Most of the following has been achieved. The calculations have been well explained in a style appropriate to a report. The mean, standard deviation, co- efficient of variation and co- efficient of correlation have been calculated and have accompanying discussion. The distribution of the data has been shown graphical and has been discussed. Only some of the following has been achieved. The calculations have been well explained in a style appropriate to a report. The mean, standard deviation, co-efficient of variation and co- efficient of correlation have been calculated and have accompanying discussion. The distribution of the data has been shown graphical and has been discussed. None or only a limited amount of the following has been achieved. The calculations have been well explained in a style appropriate to a report. The mean, standard deviation, co-efficient of variation and co- efficient of correlation have been calculated and have accompanying discussion. The distribution of the data has been shown graphical and has been discussed. Discussion and interpretation of the data The following is achieved perfectly. The results obtained through the data analysis have been thoroughly discussed and are linked back to the literature. The discussion has depth and shows insight and is supported by a clear summary/conclusion. Moreover, the discussion clearly demonstrates evidence of your own interpretation of the results (not just reiterating what was found in the literature). The following is achieved to a high standard. The results obtained through the data analysis have been thoroughly discussed and are linked back to the literature. The discussion has depth and shows insight and is supported by a clear summary/conclusion. Moreover, the discussion clearly demonstrates evidence of your own interpretation of the results (not just reiterating what was found in the literature). Most of the following has been achieved. The results obtained through the data analysis have been thoroughly discussed and are linked back to the literature. The discussion has depth and shows insight and is supported by a clear summary/conclusion. Moreover, the discussion clearly demonstrates evidence of your own interpretation of the results (not just reiterating what was found in the literature). Only some of the following has been achieved. The results obtained through the data analysis have been thoroughly discussed and are linked back to the literature. The discussion has depth and shows insight and is supported by a clear summary/conclusion. Moreover, the discussion clearly demonstrates evidence of your own interpretation of the results (not just reiterating what was found in the literature). None or only a limited amount of the following has been achieved. The results obtained through the data analysis have been thoroughly discussed and are linked back to the literature. The discussion has depth and shows insight and is supported by a clear summary/conclusion. Moreover, the discussion clearly demonstrates evidence of your own interpretation of the results (not just reiterating what was found in the literature). Graphical representation of the data The following is achieved perfectly. The graphs generated for this report are of high quality. The axes are labelled appropriately and have units. The graphs/tables have informative captions, add value to the report and are referred to appropriately in-text. The following is achieved to a high standard. The graphs generated for this report are of high quality. The axes are labelled appropriately and have units. The graphs/tables have informative captions, add value to the report and are referred to appropriately in-text. Most of the following has been achieved. The graphs generated for this report are of high quality. The axes
Answered Same DayApr 30, 2021SEN700Deakin University

Answer To: Criteria Excellent Good Satisfactory Not Satisfactory Poor Introduction and Parameter Justification...

Pooja answered on May 05 2021
137 Votes
Table of Contents
Introduction    2
Parameters and the sample population    3
Collected data    3
Descriptive statistics    5
Regression Analysis    10
Model    10
Coefficient of the independent variables    11
Assumptions of regression analysis    13
Multi-co-linearity    14
Normality of Residuals    15
Homogeneity of Residuals    15
Conclusion    18
Further Research    19
References    20
Introduction
I want to analyse if Fuel Load can be predicted with the help of Fuel Mass, Cell Lower Area, Height, and Total Pressure 3.75 G. The dependent variable is Fuel Load. The independent variables are Fuel Mass, Cell Lower Area, Height, and Total Pressure 3.75 G. Descriptive analysis is used to understand the variables involved in data. The technique of regression analysis is used to build an appropriate regression model. The assumptions of regression analysis are also checked.
Parameters and the sample population
The population cons
ists of all type of airplanes. The sample consists of randomly selected 39 airplanes.
Collected data
The dataset of applied fuel pressures is obtained from a secondary source. The source of data is Coordinating Research Council, Inc., Handbook of Aviation Fuel Properties, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., CRC Report No. 530, Warrendale, PA, 1983. 
All the variables namely fuel load, fuel mass, sugar area, height, and total pressure 3.75 G are continuous variables. All these variables are measured by the ratio scale of measurement. The measure of fuel mass in kilograms. The measure of cell lower area and height is meter square and meters respectively. The Total pressure 3.75 G is measured in N/m^2. Wilcox, R. R. (1996).
There is a total of 39 observations in this data which corresponds to volume ID. Volume ID is the same as bay number, i.e., volume 1 is contained by ribs 1 & 2. The data is shown below.
    Fuel Load (N)
    Fuel Mass (kg)
    Cell Lower Area (m^2)
    Height (m)
    Total Pressure 3.75 G (N/m^2)
    35317.37007
    3595.7412
    3.881
    0.9146
    34125.26095
    36854.96488
    3752.2872
    3.881
    0.9146
    35610.9555
    35017.73621
    3565.2348
    3.881
    0.9146
    33835.74099
    5647.309766
    574.96536
    0.6002
    1.12
    35283.92473
    17189.52149
    1750.104
    1.799
    1.147
    35831.40944
    27172.06011
    2766.4488
    2.997917662
    1.145
    33988.66711
    23552.79848
    2397.9636
    2.829076
    0.9146
    31219.73192
    20856.09373
    2123.406
    2.612
    0.8015
    29942.70731
    19846.80073
    2020.6476
    2.55
    0.7814
    29186.47166
    13202.81412
    1920.2976
    2.488
    0.7612
    28428.1999
    12529.42644
    1822.356
    2.426
    0.7411
    27667.73593
    15327.849
    2229.3756
    3.065
    0.7209
    26790.69389
    20359.33233
    2072.8296
    2.96
    0.6947
    25793.07305
    13586.03006
    1383.2244
    2.043
    0.6684
    24937.64695
    12821.1752
    1305.3528
    1.984
    0.6498
    24233.57208
    12150.94157
    1237.1148
    1.937
    0.6312
    23524.02213
    11464.93773
    1167.2712
    1.883
    0.6125
    22832.45697
    10771.04879
    1096.6248
    1.825
    0.5938
    22132.29203
    10156.01086
    1034.0064
    1.777
    0.5752
    21432.212
    9501.547428
    967.374
    1.719
    0.5566
    20727.63401
    8918.04991
    907.9668
    1.671
    0.5379
    20013.577
    8334.552391
    848.5596
    1.618
    0.5193
    19316.79324
    7741.592751
    788.18904
    1.56
    0.5006
    18609.59796
    7216.444984
    734.72256
    1.512
    0.482
    17897.92903
    6670.007443
    679.08852
    1.454
    0.4633
    17202.5639
    6181.919654
    629.3952
    1.406
    0.4447
    16488.05029
    5694.620376
    579.78216
    1.352
    0.426
    15794.98995
    5211.263647
    530.57052
    1.296
    0.4074
    15078.88787
    4779.16008
    486.57708
    1.246
    0.3888
    14383.50746
    4339.17141
    441.78084
    1.19
    0.3701
    13673.85949
    3944.12782
    401.56056
    1.14
    0.3515
    12974.10467
    1747.338515
    177.90048
    0.5263
    0.3328
    12450.16042
    1670.853029
    170.11332
    0.5173
    0.3239
    12112.31173
    3404.786871
    346.64904
    1.104
    0.3149
    11565.1728
    3016.051362
    307.071
    1.046
    0.295
    10812.80364
    2635.200955
    268.29576
    0.9823
    0.275
    10060.06676
    2288.256484
    232.97256
    0.9218
    0.2551
    9308.919306
    1969.69838
    200.53944
    0.8636
    0.2352
    8552.997827
    1665.333458
    169.55136
    0.8006
    0.2152
    7800.400284
Descriptive statistics
The table of descriptive statistics for Fuel Load (N) along with corresponding histogram is given below.
    Fuel Load (N)
     
    
    
    Mean
    11557.79996
    Standard Error
    1535.795776
    Median
    8918.04991
    Mode
    #N/A
    Standard Deviation
    9591.04155
    Sample Variance
    91988078.01
    Kurtosis
    1.138028335
    Skewness
    1.309505799
    Range
    35189.63142
    Minimum
    1665.333458
    Maximum
    36854.96488
    Sum
    450754.1985
    Count
    39
The distribution of fuel load is positively skewed. This implies there are very few aircraft with high fuel load. This is evident from the histogram as it has a tail towards the right.
The average fuel load is 11558 with a high standard deviation of 9591. The higher standard deviation indicates that mean is not considered as the best measure of Central Tendency. For a skewed distribution, the median is considered as a reliable measure of Central Tendency. The median through fuel load is 8918. Wilcox, R. R. (1996).
The descriptive statistics and the corresponding histogram for fuel mass are given below.
    Fuel Mass (kg)
     
    
    
    Mean
    1222.664
    Standard Error
    160.2214
    Median
    907.9668
    Mode
    #N/A
    Standard Deviation
    1000.582
    Sample Variance
    1001165
    Kurtosis
    0.538329
    Skewness
    1.121282
    Range
    3582.736
    Minimum
    169.5514
    Maximum
    3752.287
    Sum
    47683.91
    Count
    39
The distribution of fuel mass is approximately normally distributed. The average fuel mass is 1223 Kg with a low standard deviation of 160 units. The minimum and maximum fuel mass is 170 kg and 3752 kg. Huck, S. W., Cormier, W. H., & Bounds, W. G. (1974).
The descriptive statistics and the corresponding histogram for Cell Lower Area are given below.
     
    Cell Lower Area (m^2)
    
    
    1222.664
    Mean
    160.2214
    Standard Error
    907.9668
    Median
    #N/A
    Mode
    1000.582
    Standard Deviation
    1001165
    Sample Variance
    0.538329
    Kurtosis
    1.121282
    Skewness
    3582.736
    Range
    169.5514
    Minimum
    3752.287
    Maximum
    47683.91
    Sum
    39
    Count
The distribution of cell lower area is approximately normally distributed. This is evident from the bell-shaped histogram. The average cell lower area is 1.8 meter square with a noticeable standard deviation of 0.9 units. The minimum and maximum cell lower area is 0.5-meter square and 3.9-meter square. Fisz, M., & Bartoszyński, R. (2018).
The descriptive statistics and the corresponding histogram for Height of Airplanes are given below.
    Height (m)
     
    
    
    Mean
    0.589677
    Standard Error
    0.041427
    Median
    0.5566
    Mode
    0.9146
    Standard Deviation
    0.258712
    Sample Variance
    0.066932
    Kurtosis
    -0.42617
    Skewness
    0.580016
    Range
    0.9318
    Minimum
    0.2152
    Maximum
    1.147
    Sum
    22.9974
    Count
    39
The distribution of height of the airplanes is approximately normally distributed. This implies that empirical rule can be applied here. The height of the airplane has an average of 0.6 meters with a standard deviation of 0.3.  The minimum and maximum value corresponding to the height of the airplane is 0.2 and 1.14. Fisz, M., & Bartoszyński, R. (2018).
The descriptive statistics and the corresponding histogram for Total Pressure 3.75 G of Airplanes are given below.
    Total Pressure 3.75 G (N/m^2)
     
    
    
    Mean
    21323.62
    Standard Error
    1372.637
    Median
    20727.63
    Mode
    #N/A
    Standard Deviation
    8572.116
    Sample Variance
    73481166
    Kurtosis
    -1.13194
    Skewness
    0.198494
    Range
    28031.01
    Minimum
    7800.4
    Maximum
    35831.41
    Sum
    831621.1
    Count
    39
The distribution of Total Pressure 3.75 G of the airplanes is approximately normally distributed. This implies that empirical rule can be applied here. The Total Pressure 3.75 G of the airplane has an average of 21323.62 N/m^2 with a standard deviation of 8572. The minimum and maximum value corresponding to the Total Pressure 3.75 G of the airplane is 7800 and 35831. Fisz, M., & Bartoszyński, R. (2018).
Regression Analysis
Model
The regression output as obtained from the Excel is given below.
    SUMMARY OUTPUT
    
    
    Regression Statistics
    Multiple R
    0.988031
    R Square
    0.976206
    Adjusted R Square
    0.973407
    Standard Error
    1564.05
    Observations
    39
    ANOVA
    
    
    
    
    
     
    df
    SS
    MS
    F
    Significance F
    Regression
    4
    3.41E+09
    8.53E+08
    348.7347
    4.42E-27
    Residual
    34
    83172635
    2446254
    
    
    Total
    38
    3.5E+09
     
     
     
     
    Coefficients
    Standard Error
    t Stat
    P-value
    Lower 95%
    Upper 95%
    Intercept
    2546.853
    1655.837
    1.538106
    0.133278
    -818.212
    5911.919
    Fuel Mass (kg)
    11.94972
    1.641744
    7.278672
    1.99E-08
    8.613293
    15.28614
    Cell Lower Area (m^2)
    -2161.08
    1612.513
    -1.3402
    0.18907
    -5438.1
    1115.938
    Height (m)
    2961.189
    6663.565
    0.444385
    0.65958
    -10580.8
    16503.18
    Total Pressure 3.75 G (N/m^2)
    -0.15909
    0.224653
    -0.70814
    0.483684
    -0.61564
    0.297463
The regression equation is given by: Fuel Load (N) = 2546.853 + 11.94972*Fuel...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here