2part reflection
Health Ethics (HLTH 5002) Assignment 2: Ethics theory and reasoning; reflection on ethical practice (60%) (3000 words) 1,2,3 This assessment has two parts: A group presentation (20%, 1000-word equivalent) and an individual reflection (80%, 2000 words). Part 1. Group presentation The group presentation will allow you to build on your skills by implementing the concepts applied in Assessment 1 to a group situation. You will work with a group of students to apply the 6-step ethical framework to a specific case. Your presentation will be via Zoom. One member of the group can share the screen and each group member have an opportunity to describe how the framework was used to address the issue. Your presentation should be recorded. One student in the group will be responsible for submission of the recorded presentation to the learnonline site. Part 2. Reflection on ethical practice This reflection will require you to consider your approach to ethical practice in the context of your current career and career aspirations. You should also consider how your approach may differ to that of your colleagues and how you might negotiate these differences. Begin by considering the processes associated with completing Part 1 of this assignment, the group presentation. Do you believe your ethical practices and values differed from those of other group members? Without naming other group members, describe whether there were differences in perceptions between group members and how this was managed. You should also consider how you approach ethical issues in your current role. What are some of the issues that have or might arise in this role? How have you dealt with these issues in the past and have you learned approaches in this course that might change the way you approach ethical practice? Incorporated within the grade for this reflection is a mark for your engagement in the forum discussions over the 13 weeks of the course. You are expected to contribute a post that is relevant to the case study for that week or to the trolley problem discussion. This could be in response to a post already on the forum or a new post, raising a point, opinion or observation. You may choose to provide a statement in the reflection about your engagement in the forum; however, this is not necessary. Topic for the assignment The topic for the group presentation aspect of this assignment is: Should persons who are culpable for their ill health be required to pay more money towards the public health system than others? Structure of the Assignment Part 1: Group presentation (40 marks) The group presentation will be ten minutes long and presented using Zoom. You may use PowerPoint (or similar) slides to present concepts. The final slide will be a reference list for the sources cited in the presentation. One member of the group can share the screen and each group member is required to describe how the framework was used to address the issue. Your presentation should be recorded. One student in the group with be responsible for submission of the recorded presentation to the learnonline site. Part 2: Reflection on ethical practice (40 marks) The reflection should be structured in essay format, with an introduction and conclusion. Following the conclusion, you should provide a reference list. It is helpful to use sub-headings throughout, as this will help you to structure your thinking and the flow of content, plus makes it easier for the reader. Referencing correctly You must use the UniSA Harvard Referencing system to reference all material which is not your own. This includes providing both in-text references and a reference list. Your referencing must include peer-reviewed academic references, quality primary sources (such as government websites), images which are not your own, and online articles. If you cite a source from a resource or video, you must reference the original source. Referencing Support UniSA Harvard referencing style guide UniSA Roadmap to Referencing Format requirements Your reflection should include an informative title, and your name and student ID number should be included on your assignment document. It should be succinct, clearly and logically structured, and contain no grammatical or other errors of expression. The assignment should be saved as a Word document. The report should be structured using the sections outlined above, including headings. https://lo.unisa.edu.au/pluginfile.php/1396048/mod_resource/content/4/HRG%202018%20Dec.pdf https://lo.unisa.edu.au/pluginfile.php/1396048/mod_resource/content/4/HRG%202018%20Dec.pdf https://lo.unisa.edu.au/pluginfile.php/1396048/mod_resource/content/4/HRG%202018%20Dec.pdf https://lo.unisa.edu.au/pluginfile.php/1396048/mod_resource/content/4/HRG%202018%20Dec.pdf https://www.library.unisa.edu.au/referencing-roadmap/ The written component of this assignment must not exceed 2000 words (which includes in-text references but not the reference list, tables or figures). Any text exceeding the 2000-word limit will NOT be assessed. There is no minimum word limit, but you need to make sure you have addressed all points. Text should be formatted with 1.5 spacing and size 12 font. For tables/figures you may use single (1.0) spacing and 10-point font (but no smaller than this). Include the page number on each page. Deadline The deadline for submission is 5PM Friday, 11th June 2021. Should you require an extension, please submit your request via the learnonline site as soon as possible. Rubric The marking rubric will indicate how this assessment will be marked. You should download this and keep it handy as you complete your task. Please refer to the rubric and make sure that you have addressed the relevant criteria. Submission Please submit your assignment through learnonline. You do not need a cover sheet. One student from each group should submit the recorded Zoom presentation to the learnonline submission link. Students should individually submit Part 2 of the assessment as a Word document, uploaded to the learnonline submission link. All assignments will be automatically assessed by Turnitin. Assignments demonstrating similarity will be reviewed for academic misconduct, so it is very important that you read your Turnitin reports and make any necessary changes. Turnitin compares your assignment against all assignments in the Turnitin databases AND all electronic resources such as the web or library databases and provides a similarity report. The report highlights text, images or tables which is similar to another source and calculates a percentage. The percentage on its own means very little, because if you have referenced sources, then these references should be identified by Turnitin as being similar to library databases or the original source. For any assignment where you are required to use references, the similarity report percentage will never be zero (0%). When using Turnitin, you MUST OPEN and READ the Turnitin report, not just look at the similarity percentage. Your Turnitin report should ALWAYS show your references/reference list as being similar or the same as another source. BUT unless you have directly quoted (and correctly referenced text as a direct quote), there should no other text identified as similar to another source. If Turnitin has highlighted areas of text within your assignment that is not a direct quote and referenced as such, this is likely to be word for word copying from a source or paraphrasing of the source; and this is plagiarism. It is always worth reading your Turnitin report and if needed, amend your assignment BEFORE you submit the final version. Please note that it can take over 24 hours to generate a Turnitin report or longer in peak periods. Please also note that suspected plagiarism cases will be referred to an Academic Integrity Officer. For further information please access the following resource: https://lo.unisa.edu.au/mod/book/view.php?id=252146 https://lo.unisa.edu.au/pluginfile.php/2771298/mod_resource/content/2/Health%20Ethics%20%28HLTH%205002%29%20Assignment%202%20Rubric.pdf https://lo.unisa.edu.au/mod/book/view.php?id=252146 Be careful to maintain academic integrity Refer to the Study Resources Moodle page for information on Academic Integrity. Assessment This assignment is worth 60% of the marks for this course. The marking scheme (rubric) can be found within the Assessment section of the course site. All assignments will be assessed according to this rubric. Late submissions penalties will be applied as per the following: ▪ Late submissions accrue 10% deduction per day or part thereof. As the assignment is worth 80 marks, a deduction of 8 marks per day will apply. ▪ Assignments submitted more than 5 days after the due date will not be marked. We will upload your assignment mark with feedback to learnonline no later than three weeks following the submission deadline. **PLEASE NOTE** Students are advised that the topics of this assessment task may raise issues in relation to previous or current experiences. If you are experiencing difficulties as a result, we encourage you to speak to your course coordinator (
[email protected]) or the counselling services available through the Student Engagement Unit which can be accessed at this link: https://i.unisa.edu.au/students/student- support-services/counselling/. https://online.unisa.edu.au/current-students/study-resources mailto:
[email protected] https://i.unisa.edu.au/students/student-support-services/counselling/ https://i.unisa.edu.au/students/student-support-services/counselling/ Assessment Feedback HLTH 5002 Health Ethics Assessment 2: Ethics theory and reasoning; reflection on ethical practice Weighting 60% of final grade The Course Objectives being assessed (1,3,4) Your name: Marker’s initials: ID: FINAL GRADE: Criteria HD (Advanced) D (Well-developed) C (Sound) P1 (Adequate) P2 (Limited) F1 (Inadequate) F2 (Not Attempted) (85-100%) (75-84%) (65-74%) (55-64%) (50-54%) (40-49%) (0-39%) Part 1. Group Presentation (20%) Introduction (1) Provides clear outline of what will be addressed in the presentation, (2) comprehensive coverage of all sections, (3) ethical issue clearly defined. 2 marks Excellent, insightful and comprehensive coverage of all points. Very good coverage of most points. Good coverage of most points. Good coverage of two points, incorrect/incomple te coverage of other points. Good coverage of one point, incorrect/incomple te coverage of other points. Incorrect/incomple te coverage of other points Not attempted Ethical Framework Coverage of each of the six areas of the framework. High quality, detailed application of the 6-step framework. Demonstrates an excellent grasp of each step. Very good application of the 6-step framework. Demonstrates a very good understanding of each step. Good application of the 6-step framework