Penn Foster Ethics in Criminal Justice : CJS105 Graded Project Lesson 5 Overview During the course of every day, various ethical issues will require you to make decisions that may affect your career,...

1 answer below »
Hello, please review my project, and let me know if you are able to complete my project by Thursday 11/4


Penn Foster Ethics in Criminal Justice : CJS105 Graded Project Lesson 5 Overview During the course of every day, various ethical issues will require you to make decisions that may affect your career, your personal life, and perhaps the lives or livelihoods of others, including your coworkers, friends, and potential criminal defendants. At the end of most of the chapters in your textbook, you were presented with a variety of ethics-related scenarios to evaluate. This course project presents similar situations that you’ll respond to. Be sure to answer each of the questions as completely as possible, using the information in your textbook and any other information you’ve learned to support your positions. The questions have no absolute right or wrong answers. Your answers should be logical and supported by information in the textbook or other reference material. 5.1 Analyze various ethical dilemmas CJS105 Graded Project Page 1Copyright Penn Foster, Inc. 2019 Course Version: 1 READING ASSIGNMENT Your project must be submitted as a Word document (.docx, .doc). Your project will be individually graded by your instructor and therefore will take up to a few weeks to grade. Be sure that each of your files contains the following information: Your name Your student ID number The lesson number Your email address Note: If you have more than 10 attachments, you’ll need to WinZip all of the project’s associated files along with all documentation using the WinZip software program. To submit your graded project, follow these steps: 1. Go to http://www.pennfoster.edu. 2. Log in to your student portal. 3. Click on Take Exam next to the lesson you’re working on. 4. Follow the instructions provided to complete your exam. Be sure to keep a backup copy of any files you submit to the school! Instructions To satisfy the requirements for this project, you must prepare six short, 250-word essays in response to five questions. Each question is worth 20 points. The five questions are based on the following scenario. Imagine you’re working as an administrator in a police department in your local town or city. Each day, you interact with police officers in your department and other departments, members of your office staff, public officials, members of the public, representatives from the press, Page 2Copyright Penn Foster, Inc. 2019 Course Version: 1 potential criminal defendants, and others. As you prepare your answers to the questions, keep in mind that you’re a public official and that you have a duty to uphold justice and follow the law. Ethical Dilemma 1: Gun Rally You’ve received an anonymous tip that a local gun advocacy group plans to hold a rally in the town square the next day. The group hasn’t applied for a permit to hold a rally, but they’ve held such events in the past and they’ve always been peaceful. You strongly support Article 2 of the Constitution and the beliefs of the gun advocacy group, and you don’t want to do anything to offend the members. You believe the anonymous tipster is providing accurate information, but you can’t be absolutely sure. You also believe that no one else in your police department is aware of the impending event. What do you do? Give reasons to support your decision. Ethical Dilemma 2: Chief's Orders Assume that in response to the tip you received about the gun rally, you decide to advise your fellow police officers. You gather a group of officers together the next day in case the unlawful rally is held. As the gun advocacy group begins to appear on the town square, you confer with the chief officer on duty. She tells you to wait until the entire group has gathered and then storm the area, with tear gas and billy clubs. You’re further instructed to arrest everyone you can and to Page 3Copyright Penn Foster, Inc. 2019 Course Version: 1 charge them with unlawful assembly, trespassing, rioting, and anything else you can come up with. She also makes some very derogatory comments about anyone who supports such a group, claiming they’re terrorists and thugs. You personally disagree with the chief and believe she’s acting both improperly and immorally, allowing her personal beliefs to interfere with her legal responsibilities as a police officer. What do you do? Do you follow her orders? Why or why not? Explain your answer. Ethical Dilemma 3: Accepting Favors You’re asked to investigate the gun advocacy group and their activities. To do so, you need to work with the police department in the next county. After contacting their chief, you’re assigned to work with another seasoned officer who has also been conducting some preliminary investigations of the group. You decide to do some field investigations together the following day. While you’re out working on the investigation, the other officer decides to stop at the local convenient market for some lunch. He picks up a sandwich and coffee, waves to the owner, and returns to the police vehicle—without paying for the items. When you ask him about it, he says that he has an “arrangement” with the owner and not to worry about it. He explains that he and the store owner help each other out (meaning the officer provides additional protection to the store in exchange for the food). Finally, he says, “If you’re hungry, go inside and pick up what you want.” What do you do and what concerns do you have? Explain your answers. Page 4Copyright Penn Foster, Inc. 2019 Course Version: 1 Ethical Dilemma 4: Reporting a Deal You happen to be in the courthouse during the trial of some of the members of the gun advocacy group. As you walk by the chambers of the judge who is presiding over the trial, you overhear the judge and the chief prosecutor discussing the case. The judge is talking about one of the defendants in the case and is making some very derogatory comments. You’ve often appeared in trials before this judge, and you’ve always found him to be fair and impartial. In this case, however, you’re concerned that the judge and prosecutor may be engaging in inappropriate activity. This situation is particularly troublesome because the trial is proceeding at the request of all parties as a bench trial, with the decision being rendered by the judge without the benefit of a jury. What would you do? Explain your answer. Ethical Dilemma 5: Breaking Prison Rules In the course of your investigation of the gun advocacy group, you have to go to your local county prison to question one of the group members being held there pending trial. This particular individual has been a problem inmate and is being held in solitary confinement. He’s to have no contact with other members of the group. You meet with him alone in a private interrogation room. He knows that you generally support the group, and he does his best to answer your questions, although his answers aren’t as complete as you would like. At the end of the questioning—just before he rises to leave the room—he slips you a note in a sealed envelope and asks that you give it to someone Page 5Copyright Penn Foster, Inc. 2019 Course Version: 1 who is involved in the gun advocacy group. He says it’s very important and implores you to just hand it to the person or drop it in the mail. He then leaves the interrogation room. What do you do? Explain your answer. Ethical Dilemma 6: Crisis Intervention or Use of Force? While on routine patrol you’re dispatched to an apartment building where there’s been a report of a male disturbing the peace. As you and your partner arrive on the scene, the apartment manager informs you that the tenant on the second floor is threatening other tenants. Upon reaching the suspect you begin shouting commands for the subject to place his hands where they can be seen. The subject isn’t complying with the commands and is acting in a way that you’re trained to understand may be linked to mental health illness. What do you do? Explain your answer. Project Specifications 1. Create a title page with the following information: a. Title: Ethics in Criminal Justice b. Your name c. Your student number d. Project number e. Current date 2. Prepare your answers to the ethical dilemmas in a word processing program. Each answer should be at least 250 words. 3. Double-space your answers. Use 12-point font—either Times Page 6Copyright Penn Foster, Inc. 2019 Course Version: 1 New Roman or Arial—and one-inch margins. 4. Incorporate and properly reference any sources of information you’ve used to develop your answers. Use proper APA in-text citation formatting and include an APA References page at the end of your paper. For assistance with citing your sources and doing a references page, see the Research and Writing page in the Penn Foster Virtual Library: http://pflibrary.pennfoster.edu/c.php?g=633288 (pflibrary.pennfos ter.edu/c.php?g=633288) 5. Read over your work carefully. Make sure it’s professional with correct formatting, grammar, and citations, along with adequate support for any arguments you make. 6. Submit the final draft of your work, along with the title page, only after you’ve completed writing your answers to each dilemma. Grading Criteria Your project will be graded on the following criteria: Content 60% Written communication 15% Format 25% Here’s a brief explanation of each of these criteria. Content The student provides an answer to each of the ethical dilemmas. Page 7Copyright Penn Foster, Inc. 2019 Course Version: 1 http://pflibrary.pennfoster.edu/c.php?g=633288 The student includes theories, judgments, ethical systems, moral rules, and/or the ethical pyramid to support the answers. Ethical Dilemma 1: Gun Rally 10% Ethical Dilemma 2: Chief’s Orders 10% Ethical Dilemma 3: Accepting Favors 10% Ethical Dilemma 4: Reporting a Deal 10% Ethical Dilemma 5: Breaking Prison Rules 10% Ethical Dilemma 6: Crisis Intervention or Use of Force? 10% Written Communication The student Includes an introductory paragraph, a body, and a concluding paragraph for each answer Uses correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure Provides clear organization by using words and phrases like first, however, on the other hand, and so on, consequently, since, next, and when Makes sure the answers contain no typographical errors Format The answers should be 250 words each, double-spaced, typed in Times New Roman or Arial—font size 12, and contain Internet and library-research sources. For assistance with library resources from Page 8Copyright Penn Foster, Inc. 2019 Course Version: 1 the Penn Foster Virtual Library, please check the Criminal Justice page: http://pflibrary.pennfoster.edu/c.php?g=592726 (pflibrary.pennfo ster.edu/c.php?g=592726) Preparing for the Proctored Exam READING ASSIGNMENT Read these tips on preparing for a proctored exam. Then, return to your student portal and complete your proctored exam. To prepare for a proctored exam means reviewing the assigned
Answered 1 days AfterNov 03, 2021

Answer To: Penn Foster Ethics in Criminal Justice : CJS105 Graded Project Lesson 5 Overview During the course...

Bidusha answered on Nov 04 2021
108 Votes
Ethical Dilemmas        4
ETHICAL DILEMMAS
Table of Contents
Dilemma 1:    3
Dilemma 2:    3
Dilemma 3:    4
Dilemma 4:    5
Dilemma 5:    6
References    8
Dilemma 1:
In dilemma one, we have heard that a local gun rights group is planning a gathering in th
e town square the next day, but has failed to get a permission. Moreover, I am a firm advocate of Article II of the Constitution and share the gun advocacy group's values, and I do not want to jeopardize their efforts; and I think no other officers in the department are aware of the lost license. (Ethical Dilemmas and Decisions in Criminal Justice) I would do numerous things to guarantee that the law is applied equitably to all individuals while allowing the advocacy organization to organize their protest.
First, I would ask the proper local department in charge of permits to approach the organization prior to the event to confirm that they have a permit, since we have had a concerned resident query if one has been filed with the city. This would presumably prevent the problem from arising in the first place, allowing the advocacy group to exercise its civil rights and ensuring that the law is applied fairly to all individuals. Second, I would directly talk with the organizer of the advocacy organization to see if they have the necessary permits. I would explain that we would gotten word that they were preparing the event and wanted to make sure they would be allowed to hold it lawfully. I would describe how and where to obtain the permission, as well as the charges involved with it. I would also commend the organization for its previous peaceful protests. By doing so, I am able to follow the law while also ethically supporting their cause and values.
Dilemma 2:
In reading dilemma number two, after telling a group of police about the protest, I would consult with the Chief Officer on duty, who would direct me to wait until the entire gathering had filled the town square before storming the location with tear gas and batons. She also tells me to charge the gang with unlawful assembly, vandalism, rioting, and whatever else I can think of. She also expresses disparaging remarks about the organization and those who promote it. In addition, I believe she is acting wrongly and corruptly by letting her personal convictions to override her legal obligations. I would not obey her directions to the letter (Ethical Dilemmas and Decisions in Criminal Justice)....
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here