Hi, I have attached assignment file
MBA502_T1_2020_Assessment_01_FINAL Page 1 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline Assessment 1 Information Subject Code: MBA502 Subject Name: Emotional Intelligence, Cultural Intelligence and Diversity Assessment Title: Individual Written Assessment Assessment Type: Individual Self-Analysis Journal Weighting: 30 % Total Marks: 30 Submission: Via Moodle Due Date: Week 5, Monday at 11.55pm Your Task To complete an Individual Self Analysis Journal based on the completion of several self- analysis tools and surveys. Assessment Description Based on the topics covered in Weeks 1-4, you will create an Individual Self Analysis Journal based on the completion of two evaluative surveys and getting others to complete two evaluative surveys on you. You will then use the Johari Window Model of Self-Awareness to discuss the results. Assessment Instructions 1. Complete a self-assessment through the Global Leadership Foundation’s Global Emotional Intelligence Test (GEIT) here: https://globalleadershipfoundation.com/geit/eitest.html and complete Daniel Goleman’s EQ Instrument from this free online link: https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/ei-quiz.htm 2. Contact two people who know you reasonably well (e.g. work colleagues, close friends, family members). Provide them with the link or hard-copy version of the same two survey instruments and request that they complete the survey as an assessment of you and email their survey results to you once completed. 3. Using the Johari Window Model of Self-Awareness, critically analyse your own findings and those of your associates to reflect on what you have learned about yourself. W rite a 1200- word reflective essay (+/- 10%-word count) based on the assessment results you have gathered. Discuss key areas of strengths and areas for improvement. Review major differences between your self- assessment and those that you received from your chosen two associates. https://globalleadershipfoundation.com/geit/eitest.html https://globalleadershipfoundation.com/geit/eitest.html https://globalleadershipfoundation.com/geit/eitest.html https://globalleadershipfoundation.com/geit/eitest.html http://www.businessballs.com/howardgardnermultipleintelligences.htm%23multiple%20intelligences%20tests https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/ei-quiz.htm https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/ei-quiz.htm https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/ei-quiz.htm https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/ei-quiz.htm Page 2 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline 4. Your Individual Self Analysis Journal should include the following three (3) sections: • Critically compare your results with those of the two people who evaluated you. In your analysis, use the four quadrants of the Johari Window; i.e. Open, Blind, Hidden, Unknown (approx. 400 words). • Analyse your strengths and weaknesses based on your own survey results (approx. 300 words). • Reflect on what competencies you would like to develop in order to function well as a global citizen. Provide practical examples with the assumption you work in a culturally diverse global organisation (approx. 400 words). Your Individual Self-Analysis Journal requires a significant amount of analysis and personal reflection and should be written in the first person. It should include: • Integration of these reflections with theoretical concepts. • A brief discussion of identified strengths and areas for development, presenting your own results, your associates’ results, and a discussion of the patterns, similarities/differences and trends you discover. • Evidence of integration of feedback received from your associates, as well as consideration of your own past experiences and feedback from other sources you have received in years gone by. • A clear conclusion reflecting on how your new insights may assist you with a potential career in a culturally diverse organisation. • A reference list • An Appendix with proof of completed surveys, both yours and your associates’ • Please note that the evidence of the tests is worth 6/30. Further guidance will be available during the trimester • You should consider the Johari Window model by breaking down its four parts and reflecting on how the various quadrants provide a deeper understanding of yourself Please refer to the Assessment Marking Guide to assist you in completing all the assessment criteria. Page 3 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline Important Study Information Academic Integrity Policy KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy. What is academic integrity and misconduct? What are the penalties for academic misconduct? What are the late penalties? How can I appeal my grade? Click here for answers to these questions: http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/. Word Limits for Written Assessments Submissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded. Study Assistance Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information. http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/ http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/ https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481 https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481 Page 4 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline Assessment Marking Guide Criteria F (Fail) 0%-49 % P (Pass) 50%64% CR (Credit) 65%-74 % D (Distinction) 75% - 84% HD (High Distinction) 85%-100% Mark Assessment Content (Subject specific) OUT OF 24 MARKS Provided evidence of completed surveys (of self-evaluation and two associates’ evaluations) Attached evidence of required surveys of yours as well as those of two other chosen associates (colleagues, friends or family). Marks will be deducted proportionally for missing or partially completed surveys. /6 Critical review of assessment of self- integrating feedback received from associates No evaluation and reflection of the differences in assessment results (own personal assessment vs. feedback received). Fair evaluation and reflection of the differences in assessment results (own personal assessment vs. feedback received) Good evaluation and reflection of the differences in assessment results (own personal assessment vs. feedback received). Very good critical evaluation and reflection of the differences in assessment results (own personal assessment vs. feedback received). Excellent critical evaluation and reflection of the differences in assessment results (own personal assessment vs. feedback received) /8 Theory integration No effort to integrate concepts and theories in support of discussion and reflection. Little effort to integrate concepts and theories in support of discussion and reflection. Good use of the concepts and theories in support of discussion and reflection. Very good use of the concepts and theories in support of discussion and reflection. Excellent use of the concepts and theories in support of discussion and reflection. /5 Reflection on insights gained for a potential career in a culturally diverse global organisation No reflection on insights for a potential career in a culturally diverse global organisation. Superficial reflection on insights for a potential career in a culturally diverse global organisation. Good reflection on insights for a potential career in a culturally diverse global organisation. Very good reflection on insights for a potential career in a culturally diverse global organisation. Very thorough reflection on insights for a potential career in a culturally diverse global organisation. /5 Page 5 Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline Criteria F (Fail) 0%-49 % P (Pass) 50%64% CR (Credit) 65%-74 % D (Distinction) 75% - 84% HD (High Distinction) 85%-100% Mark Structure format and presentation (consistent across all courses) OUT OF 6 MARKS Academic Structure, research, application and referencing Word count is within +/- 10% of requirement Answer is not presented in a clear and logical manner with unsatisfactory applied theory and research, poorly written and has frequent errors in referencing Word count is NOT within +/- 10% of requirement. Answer presented is somewhat clear and logical with minimal applied theory and research, a reasonable standard of writing but with an inconsistent application in referencing N/A Answer presented is sufficiently clear and logical with partial applied theory and research, a good standard of writing but with some errors in the application in referencing N/A Answer presented is substantially clear and logical which predominantly integrates applied theory and research, a high quality standard of writing but with minimal errors in the application in referencing N/A Answer presented is an exceptionally clear and logical way, which completely and comprehensively integrates applied theory and research, an impeccable standard of writing t with negligible errors in the application in referencing Word count is within +/- 10% of requirement. /6