Answer To: MASTERS OF SOCIAL WORK Assessment 1 Part A HSSW401 HSSW401 Assessment 1 Part A 500 words Relates to...
Soumi answered on Mar 28 2020
Running Head: ONLINE GROUP DISCUSSION AND CRITICAL REFLECTION 1
ONLINE GROUP DISCUSSION AND CRITICAL REFLECTION 8
ONLINE GROUP DISCUSSION AND CRITICAL REFLECTION
Table of Contents
Part A 3
Post on End of Life Decisions 3
References 5
Part B 6
Critical Reflection on the Topic of the Post 6
References 9
Part A
Post on End of Life Decisions
The evaluation of human life and the determination of the ratio between the use of medication and its outcome is a very complex matrix to calculate. As suggested by Buckley (2018), human life, when gets affected by incurable diseases, becomes a matter of choice, between what to do and what not. Arguing against the theory of choice, Elie et al. (2018) stated that, human life deserves medical care despite being affected by incurable diseases and the only choice is who would grant the provision of medical care, medical staff, or the family of the patient.
I agree with the view that, it should be medical staffs, and not the family of a patient with an incurable disease, who should determine the offering of medical care. In my personal view, based on rational approach, it is the medical staff who should determine as to what degree and extent, patent with incurable diseases be provided with medical care. The terminal illnesses that make the life numbered in days, because immense mental stress on the patient as well as on the mind of their families, as a result, the family members often fail to think rationally. The medical staffs, aware of the situation at hand, due to their experience, know how to deal with a patient with terminal illness. As argued by McHugh et al. (2018), family members might want to let their patient suffering with terminal illness, have medical care, which would only account for a failed attempt and cause heavy economical pressure on the family. In other cases family of the patient do not seek medical care, as they do not want to lengthen the agony of the affected patient. Therefore, they should leave the task of determining the application of treatment on the medical staffs.
The medical staffs have the ability to determine the level of severity and can assess the level of pain suffered by the patient. However, the medical staffs, Maxwell (2018) mentioned, have ethical bindings, which often let them to offer medical care, even knowing that there is no cure to the disease. As the mainstream medical care would not prove beneficial for the physical health of the patient, alternative and complimentary theories are offered by the medical staffs, which at least improve the mental health of the suffering patient. The family of a patient, in general, do not possess the medical knowledge about treating the mental health of a terminal disease affected patient, and therefore, I agree with the option that medical staff take the decision for the patient, who suffers from terminal diseases. Despite being supportive of the medical staff, it is quite evident that, due to regulations of the medical regulatory board of a given country, medical staffs are often compelled to provide medication, despite knowing that the medication will only add more suffering to the patient. However, the medical staffs are also the only ones, who can provide alternative medication, that sooths the nerves of a patient before his or her final departure from the world.
References
Buckley, T. (2018). Physician Assisted Suicide: An End of Life Care Option that...