how much i have to pay for this and i send u document there are totl 3 topic. you have to select only 1. and follow rubric and ethical decision framework style
Health Ethics (HLTH 5002) Assignment 1: Analysis of an ethical issue (40%) (2000 words) Course Objectives: 1,3,4 The aim of this assessment is to analyse a real-world ethical issue and discuss ethical theories of relevance to resolving the issue. You'll also demonstrate your ability to communicate information effectively to a chosen population, along with providing solutions or strategies to prevent the issue. Please make sure that you address the course objectives in your submissions. Topics and context for the assignment The ethics issue that you focus on for this assignment can be chosen from the following three topics: 1. Should the government pay smokers to quit? 2. Is it morally permissible for doctors to prescribe placebos to patients? 3. Should there be a human right to health? Why? Why not? Your task You will use the 6-step ethical decision-making framework introduced in Week 1 of the course to address the ethical issue, chosen from the three (3) options above. Structure of the Assignment The reflection should be structured in essay format, with an introduction and conclusion. It is helpful to use sub-headings throughout, as this will help you to structure your thinking and the flow of content, plus makes it easier for the reader. Introduction (5 marks) Provide an introductory paragraph that describes what will be addressed in the assignment. This will include stating the ethical issue to be considered in the assignment. Ethical Framework (30 marks) Provide a discussion around each of the six components of the framework, as they relate to the ethical issue. https://lo.unisa.edu.au/pluginfile.php/2771056/mod_resource/content/1/6-step%20Ethics%20Framework_July%202020.pdf Conclusion (5 marks) Provide a concluding statement that brings together the relevant aspects of the assignment. Do not include new information in the conclusion. Referencing (5 marks) The reference list should include all items that are cited in-text and should be structured in accordance with UniSA Harvard Referencing (please see the next section for details). Overall presentation (5 marks) Formatting requirements, spelling, grammar, text should be organised into clear sections, information supported by relevant information sources. Referencing correctly You must use the UniSA Harvard Referencing system to reference all material which is not your own. This includes providing both in-text references and a reference list. Your referencing must include academic references, quality primary sources (such as government websites), images which are not your own, and online articles. If you cite a source from a resource or video, you must reference the original source. Referencing Support UniSA Harvard referencing style guide UniSA Roadmap to Referencing Format requirements Your assignment should include an informative title, and your name and student ID number should be included on your assignment document. It should be succinct, clearly and logically structured, and contain no grammatical or other errors of expression. The assignment should be saved as a Word document. The report should be structured using the 5 sections outlined above, including headings. This assignment must not exceed 2000 words (which includes in-text references but not the reference list, tables or figures). Any text exceeding the 2000-word limit will NOT be assessed. There is no minimum word limit, but you need to make sure you have addressed all points. Text should be formatted with 1.5 spacing and size 12 font. For tables/figures you may use single (1.0) spacing and 10-point font (but no smaller than this). Include the page number on each page. Deadline The deadline for submission is 5PM Friday, 9th April 2021. Should you require an extension, please submit your request via the learnonline site as soon as possible. https://lo.unisa.edu.au/pluginfile.php/1396048/mod_resource/content/4/HRG%202018%20Dec.pdf https://lo.unisa.edu.au/pluginfile.php/1396048/mod_resource/content/4/HRG%202018%20Dec.pdf https://lo.unisa.edu.au/pluginfile.php/1396048/mod_resource/content/4/HRG%202018%20Dec.pdf https://www.library.unisa.edu.au/referencing-roadmap/ Rubric The marking rubric will indicate how this assessment will be marked. You should download this and keep it handy as you complete your task. Please refer to the rubric and make sure that you have addressed the relevant criteria. Submission Please submit your assessment, as a Word document, through learnonline via the submission link. You do not need a cover sheet. All assignments will be automatically assessed by Turnitin. Assignments demonstrating similarity will be reviewed for academic misconduct, so it is very important that you read your Turnitin reports and make any necessary changes. Turnitin compares your assignment against all assignments in the Turnitin databases AND all electronic resources such as the web or library databases and provides a similarity report. The report highlights text, images or tables which is similar to another source and calculates a percentage. The percentage on its own means very little, because if you have referenced sources, then these references should be identified by Turnitin as being similar to library databases or the original source. For any assignment where you are required to use references, the similarity report percentage will never be zero (0%). When using Turnitin, you MUST OPEN and READ the Turnitin report, not just look at the similarity percentage. Your Turnitin report should ALWAYS show your references/reference list as being similar or the same as another source. BUT unless you have directly quoted (and correctly referenced text as a direct quote), there should no other text identified as similar to another source. If Turnitin has highlighted areas of text within your assignment that is not a direct quote and referenced as such, this is likely to be word for word copying from a source or paraphrasing of the source; and this is plagiarism. It is always worth reading your Turnitin report and if needed, amend your assignment BEFORE you submit the final version. Please note that it can take over 24 hours to generate a Turnitin report or longer in peak periods. Please also note that suspected plagiarism cases will be referred to an Academic Integrity Officer. For further information please access the following resource: https://lo.unisa.edu.au/mod/book/view.php?id=252146 Be careful to maintain academic integrity Refer to the Study Resources Moodle page for information on Academic Integrity. Assessment This assignment is worth 40% of the marks for this course. The marking scheme (rubric) can be found within the Assessment section of the course site. All assignments will be assessed according to this rubric. Late submissions penalties will be applied as per the following: https://lo.unisa.edu.au/pluginfile.php/2771295/mod_resource/content/2/Health%20Ethics%20%28HLTH%205002%29%20Assignment%201%20Rubric.pdf https://lo.unisa.edu.au/mod/book/view.php?id=252146 https://online.unisa.edu.au/current-students/study-resources ▪ Late submissions accrue 10% deduction per day or part thereof. As the assignment is worth 50 marks, a deduction of 5 marks per day will apply. ▪ Assignments submitted more than 5 days after the due date will not be marked. We will upload your assignment mark with feedback to learnonline no later than three weeks following the submission deadline. **PLEASE NOTE** Students are advised that the topics of this assessment task may raise issues in relation to previous or current experiences. If you are experiencing difficulties as a result, we encourage you to speak to your course coordinator (
[email protected]) or the counselling services available through the Student Engagement Unit which can be accessed at this link: https://i.unisa.edu.au/students/student- support-services/counselling/. mailto:
[email protected] https://i.unisa.edu.au/students/student-support-services/counselling/ https://i.unisa.edu.au/students/student-support-services/counselling/ Assessment Feedback HLTH 5002 Health Ethics Assessment 1: Analysis of an ethical issue Weighting 40% of final grade The Course Objectives being assessed (1,3,4) Your name: Marker’s initials: ID: FINAL GRADE: Criteria HD (Advanced) D (Well-developed) C (Sound) P1 (Adequate) P2 (Limited) F1 (Inadequate) F2 (Not Attempted) (85-100%) (75-84%) (65-74%) (55-64%) (50-54%) (40-49%) (0-39%) Introduction (1) Provides clear outline of what will be addressed in the assignment, (2) comprehensive coverage of all sections, (3) ethical issue clearly defined. 5 marks Excellent, insightful and comprehensive coverage of all points. Very good coverage of most points. Good coverage of most points. Good coverage of two points, incorrect/incomple te coverage of other points. Good coverage of one point, incorrect/incomple te coverage of other points. Incorrect/incomple te coverage of other points Not attempted Ethical Framework Coverage of each of the six areas of the framework. 30 marks (5 marks per section of the framework) High quality, detailed application of the 6-step framework. Demonstrates an excellent grasp of each step. Very good application of the 6-step framework. Demonstrates a very good understanding of each step. Good application of the 6-step framework. Some elements missing or lacking adequate explanation. Basic application of the 6-step framework. Each step is included, but analysis lacks explanation Basic application of the 6-step framework. Some elements of the process are missing and/ or analysis lacks detail in parts. Incorrect application of the six-step framework. The process is incomplete and/ or is missing important sections Not attempted Conclusion (1) Comprehensive summary of all sections, (2) clear summary of the chosen approach, (3) no new information introduced. 5 marks Excellent, inciteful and comprehensive summary of all sections. Very good coverage of most points. Good coverage of most points. Good coverage of two points, incorrect/incomplet e coverage of other points. Good coverage of one point, incorrect/incomplet e coverage of other points. Incorrect or incomplete coverage of all points. Not attempted Referencing (1) Accurate and complete in-text referencing formatted as per UniSA Harvard Referencing style; (2) accurate and complete reference list formatted as per UniSA Harvard style. 5 marks All appropriate, accurate UniSA Harvard style in- text and reference list. References texts or information sites beyond those provided in the courses All appropriate, accurate UniSA