In a paper of 1,250-1,500 words, review a current scholarly literature article that uses pattern recognition as its research base. Describe the study, its findings, and future work that could be done.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Literature Review – Pattern Recognition In a paper of 1,250-1,500 words, review a current scholarly literature article that uses pattern recognition as its research base. Describe the study, its findings, and future work that could be done. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Rubic_Print_Format Course CodeClass CodeAssignment TitleTotal Points PSY-583PSY-583-O500Literature Review – Pattern Recognition95.0 CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (87.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints Earned Content70.0% In a paper of 1,250-1,500 words, review a current scholarly literature article that uses pattern recognition as its research base. Describe the study, its findings, and future work that could be done. 70.0%Paper does review a current scholarly literature article that uses pattern recognition as its research base. The study was not described and additional discussion of future research is not included.Paper inadequately reviews a current scholarly literature article that uses pattern recognition as its research base. Description of the study, its findings, and discussion of future research is weak and missing evidence to support claims and or examples.Paper adequately reviews a current scholarly literature article that uses pattern recognition as its research base. Description of the study, its findings, and discussion of future research is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims and or examples.Paper clearly reviews a current scholarly literature article that uses pattern recognition as its research base. Description of the study, its findings, and discussion of future research is strong with sound analysis and appropriate evidence to support claims and examplesPaper expertly reviews a current scholarly literature article that uses pattern recognition as its research base. Description of the study, its findings, and discussion of future research is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support the claims and examples. Organization and Effectiveness20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose7.0%Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Argument Logic and Construction8.0%Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0%Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Format10.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)5.0%Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct. Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)5.0%Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Total Weightage100%