Key information Due date: see Unit Guide Weighting: 30% Word count: XXXXXXXXXX% – 5%) Word count excludes references and headings. Purpose The purpose of this research report is to provide students...

1 answer below »

Key information



  • Due date: see Unit Guide

  • Weighting: 30%


Word count: 1500 (+15% – 5%) Word count excludes references and headings.


Purpose


The purpose of this research report is to provide students with the opportunity to demonstrate critical thinking in the context of adoption and use of a real-life health informatics implementation chosen by the student from their literature research. These demonstrated skills will be useful for the student in subsequent situations where the student may be participating in a business case or participating in design or implementation for a health informatics solution.



Task


The task is to prepare a research report that critically evaluates a health informatics solution (subsequently below this is called the “Solution”) that has been implemented in Australia or globally by using an analysis method presented in class (and made available for reference on the unit CloudDeakin site). You should identify and choose a real-world Solution that is a health informatics implementation. Some current example Solution implementations include My Health Record, Practice Incentives Program eHealth Incentive (ePIP), Queensland Health IT implementation at a state level, Medicare-funded Telehealth initiatives, the Epic Electronic Medical Records implementation at Royal Children hospital in Australia or any similar such Solution that has been implemented in your organisation or country. It is recommended to choose a contemporary Solution that is well documented and that fits within the context of the HME704 curriculum. Contact your educational advisor if you are unsure of how to pick a Solution topic.


Your report should:



  • Include a brief history of the chosen Solution to provide context for your analysis and identify any relevant evaluation that has already been carried out by other researchers and provide an assessment of the importance of the Solution, and the future direction of the Solution.

  • Critically evaluate the outcome of the Solution as far as is currently known.

  • Describe the positive or negative aspects of the Solution implementation and provide an evidence-based rationale.

  • Discuss the Solution’s importance and derive lessons that you believe would apply to other implementations.


The report should comprise of the below sections:



  • Introduction and Context

    • Introduces the chosen Solution and the problem it is trying to solve and provides organisation context.



  • Literature Review

    • Reviews the relevant literature about the identified problem in the chosen organisation and the health informatics Solution to be investigated that helps the student analyse the Solution.



  • Analysis, Evaluation and Discussion

    • Explains how the health informatics Solution will resolve identified issues/problems and how any barriers/or complexities that have been identified were / will be overcome.

    • Inferences are clearly and logically linked to and drawn from the analysis, and clearly discussed.

    • This section should consider at least some of these questions:

      • Is (was) there a clear need for the Solution?

      • Is (was) there a defined population or clear stakeholders who would benefit from this Solution?

      • Are there (were there) clear expected benefits of the Solution and if so, for which stakeholders?

      • Is the Solution likely to reach a larger population than the initial implementation, and if so, what are the factors that might make it scale?

      • Is there a credible causal pathway for the Solution to achieve the desired impact?

      • What are the key components or success factors of the Solution? Which one’s impact on the predicted outcome, and how do they interact with each other?

      • What change management strategies were used to support system implementation and adoption of the Solution?

      • What is the likely direction and magnitude of the effect of the Solution, or its components?

      • How confident are you about the magnitude of the effect of the Solution or its components?

      • Has the possibility of unintended consequences been adequately considered by the Solution? Were the likelihood of risks or adverse outcomes assessed?

      • Were cost and disbenefits adequately considered and measured for the Solution?





  • Recommendations

    • This section should outline your recommendations that you would propose for the Solution to have even greater impact or benefit.



  • References

Answered 2 days AfterApr 21, 2022

Answer To: Key information Due date: see Unit Guide Weighting: 30% Word count: XXXXXXXXXX% – 5%) Word count...

Insha answered on Apr 23 2022
88 Votes
Critical evaluation of a health informatics solution             1
Critical evaluation of a health informatics solution                         2
Critical evaluation of a health informatics solution
Table of Contents
Introduction    3
Research Question    3
Research Methodology    3
Literature Review    3
Analysis and Evaluation    5
Fragmentation    5
Access and quality    5
Duplication and adverse impacts    6
Coordinated ca
re    6
Discussion    6
Recommendations    7
Conclusion    8
References    9
Introduction
In 2010, Australia introduced the PCEHR (personally controlled electronic health record), which was later renamed and expanded by “the My Health Record Act 2012 Cth.” This literature review aims to determine if the system has improved healthcare system of Australia in accordance with the federal government's stated goals. The system was established in 2012 as a shared database that allowed patients to view the stored data online. Despite the government's attempts to create a reliable and secure system, the people have yet to embrace it (Pang et al. 2020).
Research Question
The goal of this review was to determine whether the MyHR systems in enhancing Australia's healthcare system, have accomplished their claimed objectives? These goals are intended to aid in the reduction of health-related information fragmentation. Reduce the likelihood of negative medical events and therapy duplication. Improve the quality and coordination of healthcare offered to patients by multiple health care providers.
Research Methodology
Each database website and search engine was used to perform the search. The article abstract or title has to contain the words given to be included in this search. "My HealthRecord" OR "MyHR" OR "personally controlled electronic health record" OR PCEHR were among the terms used in the search query. Criteria for Exclusion and Inclusion were papers related to the Australian privately controlled electronic health record system.
Also, researches concerning the system rather than clinical data were included. Since the goal of this project is to identify the actual situation, research on the users' potential impediments and expectations was avoided. The system's ideas, implementation, and acceptance rate were also omitted.
Literature Review
MyHR was created as a distributed system with a central infrastructure and many repositories to manage the transmission and storage of health data. It was designed as a complement to existing clinical information systems (CIS) rather than a replacement. Healthcare providers and Consumers (Australian citizens) were the two primary categories of users identified (general practices and hospitals) (Khan, Zia, T. A., Pearce, & Perera, 2018).
MyHR is accessed by consumers via provider portal (read-only) or their CIS, while healthcare providers access it via their organization's CIS (Jackson, & Peterson, 2019). Future updates may include features such as putting a greater emphasis boosting system maturity and on delivering consumer advantages, among other things. There was also talk regarding the government's MyHR review, which looked into any concerns that would have led to opt-out trials and PCEHR rebranding.
Policymakers hoped that by enabling and centralizing access to fragmented medical information for Australian residents, they would be able to achieve advantages such as reduced cost, improved patient care, and safety (de Mesquita, & Edwards, 2020). The current status of MyHR, as shown by this literature studies, revealed that reaching these benefits was time-consuming and complex. A $7 billion annual savings in direct expenses has been anticipated as a result of digitizing the healthcare industry (Walsh et al. 2020). This took place with significant improvements in the customer experience due to the avoidance of millions of admissions and hospital visits. According to the literature, patient record access helps to improve care quality, patient self-care,...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here