LAWS20058 AUSTRALIAN COMMERCIAL LAW ASSESSMENT 1- WRITTEN ASSESSMENT · Weighting: 40% of total grade · Due Date: Week 7 Tuesday (30 Apr XXXXXXXXXX:00 pm AEST · Word limit: 2000 words · Submission:...

1 answer below »


LAWS20058 AUSTRALIAN COMMERCIAL LAW



ASSESSMENT 1- WRITTEN ASSESSMENT





· Weighting: 40% of total grade


· Due Date: Week 7 Tuesday (30 Apr 2019) 5:00 pm AEST


· Word limit: 2000 words


· Submission: Submission to be made via the Dropbox on Moodle


· Format: One file in .doc or .docx (MS Word) format. Submissions in any other file format (e.g. .zip) will be treated as a non-submission.


· References should be footnoted, using the Australian Guide to Legal Citation. A reference list should also be included (references do not form part of the word count).






INSTRUCTIONS





This is a problem-solving assignment. You must address all 3 parts of the assignment question.




PART A



Heidi has been the assistant store manager of a highly successful coffee chain, Caffeine Stop Pty Ltd. Having worked at the coffee shop for the past four years, she has decided that it is time to start her own coffee shop. Her idea is create a place that is relaxed and vibrant, providing her customers with high quality coffee and delectable breakfast snacks such as parties and cakes. She forms a company, Roast the Day Away Pty Ltd.



Heidi’s first task is to procure a coffee machine. She drives to her local industrial area where she knows several coffee suppliers have factory outlets. As she drives down the main road, Heidi notices an advertisement placed in front of Machine Express Pty Ltd. The advertisement reads:



“The NewBean Coffee Machine has arrived in store! To celebrate you can purchase your NewBean Coffee Machine at half price. We have boxes and boxes so come in and get yours.”



Heidi immediately stops the car and rushes in to the store. She approaches the assistant manager and says, “I would like my half price coffee machine.” The assistant manager sighs and regretfully replies, “I’m sorry. That deal is no longer being offered. The coffee machines were selling too fast.”



Heidi is completely shocked by this and demands that she receive her half price NewBean Coffee Machine as advertised. “The sign outside is an offer and you are obliged by it,” she informs the manager. The manager shakes his head, “The sign is just an advertisement. We are not legally obliged by it.”



Heidi is very disappointed by the situation and feels that Machine Express Pty Ltd should take responsibility.



The manager sees Heidi’s disappointment and quickly provides a solution. “We do have the premium model of the NewBean Coffee Machine at 20% off today.”



Heidi really needs to the coffee machine and so decides to forget the half price standard NewBean coffee machine. She looks at the premium model of the NewBean Coffee Machine and is impressed with its size and capabilities. The price, however, is not so impressive. Heidi inquires whether the manager can do anything further with the price to which the manager replies, “Not on a brand new machine, however I can offer you the white floor stock machine at a further 10% off.”



Heidi is very keen on the idea, however the premium model of the NewBean is significantly larger than the standard model she had planned on buying. She tells the assistant manager that she will need to go and measure the space in her shop to make sure the machine fits. The assistant manager replies, “of course. The offer is open all day.”



Heidi leaves Machine Express Pty Ltd and goes straight back to her store to measure the space. Seeing that the machine would fit perfectly, she quickly stops for lunch and then rushes back to Machine Express Pty Ltd. To her dismay, as she is walking in, she sees another customer carrying out the white premium model NewBean. When the manager sees her, he immediately says, “You should have been faster. I couldn’t wait for you when the machine may not have fitted your store. I sold the machine a couple of minuted ago.”




Heidi is absolutely appalled and wants to take legal action. She wants advice on the following:






1.

Whether the advertisement for half price NewBean Coffee Machine is an offer or an invitation to treat



2.

Whether she has a claim against the manager for selling the premium NewBean coffee machine to another customer




PART B



Heidi arrives late for her last shift at Caffeine Stop Pty Ltd. She has been very open and honest with the store manager, Gertrude, about her hopes to open her own coffee shop and while discussing her resignation over coffee two weeks ago, the manager was very supportive.



When Heidi comes into the store and grabs her apron angrily, Gertrude is concerned. Heidi recounts the events of the morning with the two coffee machines and her annoyance at Machine Express Pty Ltd. Gertrude listens and while handing Heidi a tray with three coffees for the back table, says, “Don’t worry about it at all. You can have one of our retiring machines at a great price. It is at least something to start off with.”



Heidi is pleased by this offer and quickly accepts, thinking how much easier opening the store will be when she has a machine is already familiar with. She tells Gertrude she will bring in the money next week.



However, when Heidi arrives the next week Gertrude has had a change of heart. Gertrude explains that she would like to see how much she can get for the machine online before making any concrete decisions.




Heidi is running out of time and was relying on the machine that Gertrude had promised. She would like to know whether a contract exists between Gertrude and herself.





PART C



Worrying that she will not have a coffee machine for her grand opening, Heidi orders the GreenBean Coffee Machine from Coffee Supplies Fast Pty Ltd, a company specialising in fast coffee supply deliveries. The machine arrives just in time for Heidi to hang the open sign on her door.



The first few coffees that the GreenBean makes are very good and customers seem really happy. However after one hour, the machine gets very hot and the coffee that comes out tastes burnt and smoked. Heidi is forced to stop making and selling any form of coffee. The only goods she has left to sell are pastries and cakes. However none of her customers are interested in the snacks without a coffee. Heidi has lost all her profits for the first day of the store being open. She quickly calls around until she finds a coffee machine supplier who has the NewBean Coffee Machine in stock. While it is not on sale, Heidi knows it is reliable. She does not open Roast the Day Away again until the NewBean arrives one week later. She has lost significant profits because of the the faulty GreenBean.



Further, one of Heidi’s main investors, Tate, comes by Roast the Day Away on day three of the store being closed. Seeing the store closed, the investor calls Heidi and informs her that he will be withdrawing his investment in her store.




Heidi would like advice. She would like to know what damages she can claim from Coffee Supplies Fast Pty Ltd for all the losses that she has incurred.








Answered Same DayApr 21, 2021LAWS20058Central Queensland University

Answer To: LAWS20058 AUSTRALIAN COMMERCIAL LAW ASSESSMENT 1- WRITTEN ASSESSMENT · Weighting: 40% of total...

Debbani answered on Apr 24 2021
145 Votes
Contract and Consumer LAws
    Contract and Consumer LAws    CASE STUDIES
    
    
Table of Contents
PART A    2
Issue    2
Rule of Law    2
Application and Analysis    2
Conclusion    4
PART B    5
Issue    5
Rule of Law    5
Application and Analysis    5
Conclusion    6
PART C    7
Issue    7
Rule of Law    7
Application and Analysis    7
Conclusion    11
BIBLIOGRAPHY    12
PART A
Issue
Whether the advertisement for half price NewBean Coffee Machine an offer or an invitation to treat
Whether she can claim from the shop for selling the premium NewBean coffee machine to ano
ther customer.
Rule of Law
Under the law of contract, an offer is distinguished from the invitation to treat. An offer is the actual proposal from the offeror to the offeree, whereas an invitation to treat is the invitation given to world at large or a targeted group to come up with a proposal, so as to be accepted so as to form the legal binding agreement.
Application and Analysis
In the present facts of the case, Heidi (H) wanted to start coffee shop, and named the business as Roast the Day Away Pty Ltd. She came across an advertisement by Machine Express Pty Ltd, while procuring the coffee machine. The advert stated half price for the NewBean Coffee Machine, but when approached, the shop informed about no stock, however she was offered the premium model of the same machine at 20% discount. But, not satisfied with price she inquired for more options, and was informed that a further discount can be offered on another machine which is not new. H wanted to measure the space to fit the premium model, and store informed that offer is open throughout the day. But, the machine was sold to someone else. So, whether the advertisement is an offer or an invitation to treat is the underlying issue. In the landmark decision of Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern)Ltd [1952][footnoteRef:1], the Court held that, when the customers picks up things from the display window, that does not in itself constitute an offer, but it is rather the offer to buy the things displayed and unless that offer is accepted by the one selling it, do not constitute a legal binding agreement. Furthermore, in cases of Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club Ltd v Blackpool Borough Council [1990][footnoteRef:2], Hughes Aircraft Systems International v Air services Australia [1997][footnoteRef:3], and also in case of Suessenbach v The Mining and Resources Contractors Safety Training Association INC (2000)[footnoteRef:4], the Court opined that, there existed no contractual obligations and hence no binding agreements. But, an advertisement can be an offer when the terms to it are definite, say for example the quantity or that of the quality or the price is detailed in such a way that any reasonable person would clearly see the advertiser’s intention to create a legal binding agreement, and the terms can also be implied and not expressed specifically as was held in case of Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW) [1982][footnoteRef:5] [1: Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern)Ltd [1952] 2 QB 795] [2: Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club Ltd v Blackpool Borough Council [1990] 1 WLR 1195] [3: Hughes Aircraft Systems International v Air services Australia [1997] 146 ALR 1] [4: Suessenbach v The Mining and Resources Contractors Safety Training Association INC (2000) WASCA 313] [5: Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW) [1982] 149 CLR 337]
Secondly, for the issue of claim regarding the sale of the product to a different customer can be determined by following the decision in case of Goldsborough, Mort & Co Ltd v Quinn [1910][footnoteRef:6], where a promise made for keeping the offer alive for a specific time can be enforceable if that is supported with the consideration. But, in the present case, H did not provide any consideration to the shop manager, so without the valid consideration, in the form of say token money or booking fee, the promise so made by the manager cannot be enforced, whereas proving that would have fulfilled the requisites of a valid option contract, was held in cases of Byrne & Co v Leon Van Tienhoven & Co [1880][footnoteRef:7], and also in Mobil Oil Australia Ltd v Wellcome International Pty Ltd [1998][footnoteRef:8]. [6: Goldsborough, Mort & Co Ltd v Quinn [1910] 10 CLR 674] [7: Byrne & Co v Leon Van Tienhoven & Co [1880] 5 CPD 344] [8: Mobil Oil Australia Ltd v Wellcome International Pty Ltd [1998] 81 FCR 475]

Conclusion
Based on the facts of the case, there was no offer made by the shop but an invitation to treat can only be deduced if it can be ascertained that there was intention on the part of the shop to enter in to a valid agreement with any one who comes with the offer.
For the second issue, H can claim nothing from the shop, since she did not provide any consideration and neither she booked the product with a minimum price.
PART B
Issue
Whether, there existed the contract between G and H.
Rule of Law
When a promise is made for keeping the offer open then it can only be enforced if the offeree supports that promise with the consideration and without it there forms no agreement and hence nothing can be enforced as against the offeror. Only on providing the consideration, the enforceability of the contract comes in to question.

Application and Analysis
In the present facts of the case, H on her last shift at...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here