Part 2: Critique one peer post (from Discussion Forum submitted in Module 2.1) (300...

Question

Part 2: Critique one peer post (from Discussion Forum submitted in Module 2.1) (300 words)Instructions:
Each student is required to critique an original post of a peer.

MGT502_Assessment_2_Brief_Discussion Forum_Module 5Page2of6

Your critique should include commentary on:

Whether the original post is comprehensive. Please identify missing components, if any, and provide constructive feedback.

Have all plausible characteristics been identified?

Are one or more examples provided? Provide a critique on the examples and their suitability

in supporting statements.

You must include reference to literature.

oUseatleast4in-textcitationsperpart.
oReferencethebook,article,ordocumentusingAPA6thstyleinthefinalreferencelist.

Part 3: Summarise learning (300 words)Instructions:
Each student is required to reflect on:
- How your views of effective business communication have changed since your original post.
- What are the 3 key points you have learned from the discussions during this course and
  
  how you can apply that knowledge in the future.
- Give one or more practical examples of how to apply peer review in your professional
  
  development.
- You must include reference to the literature.
  
  oUseatleast4in-textcitationsperpart.
  oReferencethebook,article,ordocumentusingAPA6thstyleinthefinalreferencelist.
  
  Please ensure you submit your Discussion Forum Report by 11:55 pm AEST
  
  Students are responsible for:

Staying within the word limit

Keeping drafts and backups of their assignment

Submitting the assignment via Blackboard by the due date

Ensuring their assignment is written and submitted while observing and committing to the

Academic Integrity policy

Please note that if you require an extension for this assignment, you must apply using the university application form and provide verifiable evidence of extenuating circumstances before the due date and include your most recent draft. Please also treat the prescribed word limit as a limit not to be breached.

Referencing:

MGT502_Assessment_2_Brief_Discussion Forum_Module 5Page3of6

It is essential that you use the appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing herehttp://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing

Submission Instructions:
Submit your initial post via theAssessment 2 Discussion Forum linkin the Assessment section

found in the main navigation menu of the subject Blackboard site.

A rubric will be attached to the assessment. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.

Marking Rubric:

Your assessment will be marked against the rubric which is shown on the next pages. Please ensure that your submission addresses all four of the Assessment Attributes in the rubric.

MGT502_Assessment_2_Brief_Discussion Forum_Module 5Page4of6

Assessment Rubric

Assessment Attributes

Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49%

Pass (Functional) 50-64%

Credit (Proficient) 65-74%

Distinction (Advanced) 75 -84%

High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%

Knowledge and understanding of the chosen form of business communication

Percentage for this

criterion
35 %

Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge

Key components of the assignment are not addressed.

Knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline.

Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas.

Often confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.

Thorough knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.

Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.

Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s.

Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.

Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.

A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s.

Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.

Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning.

Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge

Percentage for this

criterion
35 %

Limited synthesis and analysis.

Limited application based upon analysis.

Demonstrated analysis and synthesis of new knowledge with application.

Shows the ability to interpret relevant information and literature.

Well-developed analysis, synthesis, and application linked to analysis/synthesis.

Thoroughly developed and creative analysis and synthesis with application of pretested models and / or independently developed models and justified arguments linked to analysis/synthesis.

Highly sophisticated and creative analysis, synthesis of new with existing knowledge.

Strong application by way of pretested models and / or independently developed models. Arguments are clearly justified based on the analysis/synthesis.

MGT502_Assessment_2_Brief_Discussion Forum_Module 4.2 Page5of6

Applying knowledge to new situations/other cases.

Effective Communication

Percentage for this

criterion
15 %

Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence.

Audience cannot follow the line of reasoning.

Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical.

Line of reasoning is often difficult to follow.

Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments.

Line of reasoning is easy to follow.

Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented; the presentation is logical, clear and well supported by evidence.

Demonstrates cultural sensitivity.

Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments.

Engages and sustains audience’s interest in the topic, demonstrates high levels of cultural sensitivity.

Correct citation of key resources and evidence

Percentage for this criterion15 %

Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas

Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed.

Demonstrates use of credible resources to support and develop ideas.

Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements.

Show evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence.

Demonstrates use of high- quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements.

Show evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence.

MGT502_Assessment_2_Brief_Discussion Forum_Module 4.2 Page6of6

mgt502assessment2126week-snimy0fd.pdf

Parul · Accepted Answer

Part 2 is- Critique to the peer assignment
In the golden words of Les Brown, "Your ability to communicate is an important took in your pursuit of your goal". In business or personal facet communication plays a critical role in attainment of goals. Indeed, I agree with your prospective, characteristic of an effective business communication is inclined in interchanging the information such that it promotes culture of organization and drive employees to achieve their targets thereby enhancing the revenue such that business becomes more profitable. What I like most about your response is how you highlighted the ley importance to the body language, non-verbal cues like facial expressions and tone in order to determine whether the communication is effective or not. What I found missing in your response is the importance of Listening skills in order to make communication effective and productive. Since it is one of the integral aspects to conduct excellent communication yet most understated element. This is root cause of many conflicts, miss-understanding as well as wrong decisions made over time. Since, people fail to listen and only focus on what to say next. Today we live in an era where most of us are online 24x7, indeed a world that is highly driven by speed, technology and stress. Therefore, in this scenario, having excellence in communicating the message as well as properly interpreting what others have to say has become crucial. However, it is a sad plight that we devote least amount of time in really listening to others.

Part 2: Critique one peer post (from Discussion Forum submitted in Module XXXXXXXXXXwords)Instructions: Each student is required to critique an original post of a peer....

Answer To: Part 2: Critique one peer post (from Discussion Forum submitted in Module...

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment