PART A: Problem Question (30 marks) Part A should be max. 1250 words. Mike is a university student who works two part-time jobs to help support his elderly grandfather, who lives in an assisted living...

1 answer below »


PART A: Problem Question
(30 marks)




Part A should be max. 1250 words.


Mike is a university student who works two part-time jobs to help support his elderly grandfather, who lives in an assisted living facility. He feels like he “owes him” as his grandfather raised him.


Mike has a long-time friend Trent who has been trying to convince Mike that he should quit university, as he would make more money working with him. It is unclear what Trent does for work, but Mike suspects it is something that “is not quite right”.


One of Mike’s part time jobs is being a teller at a bank. Mike hates working there as the manager is a bully who makes Mike and other tellers do his tasks for him, and Mike is convinced that he should be paid more for the work he does.


One Friday evening Trent meets Mike at the University bar for drinks. Trent tries again to convince Mike to come work with him. Mike again refuses. Trent seems to give up and suggests they go hang out at Mike’s apartment. After a couple of hours of watching TV, Trent decides to leave but before going asks if he can leave a small package with Mike for a couple of weeks. Mike is hesitant but agrees. Trent tells Mike that the wrapped parcel would be best kept in the oven to hide it for safekeeping, knowing that Mike does not cook.


A couple of weeks later, Trent returns to visit Mike. Trent appears aggressive and pushes his way into the apartment. Trent then tells Mike that he needs to help him out with something otherwise “bad things will happen”. Mike asks if everything is okay and what Trent means by “bad things will happen”. Trent laughs hysterically and says “oh, I’m fine nothing bad will happen to me. Your girl, on the other hand, should be worried, since you think you’re all fancy and better than me studying law at Uni and won’t join me”.


Mike is initially confused about the “your girl” comment as he is currently single, but then realises Trent is referring to one of his classmates who he studies with regularly at the university library. Mike is unsettled at the thought that Trent has been watching him.


Mike tries to talk to Trent reminding him that they are old friends and asks where this aggression is coming from. Trent then says, “he doesn’t care about friends” and that Mike has to “cooperate or be ready to face the consequences.”


Trent then tells Mike to “grab some cash” from the bank he works at.


Mike does not want to, but he fears for his classmate’s safety.Over the next couple of weeks, he observes the activity in the bank. He notices that one of the ATMs in the branch is “out of order” awaiting repair. The manager mentions that the ATM is letting out lots of money because the security system “has a bug”.


Mike stays back after work one night and accesses the faulty ATM to withdraw $20,000.


The next day, Mike is “freaking out” and goes to visit his grandfather. He takes $1000 of the $20 000 he got from the bank, as a gift for his grandfather. Mike also bought himself a new laptop for $1500 to help with his studies. His grandfather asks where he got so much money from. Mike tells him that it was a bonus from work, that they are paying back money they owe him for doing the manager’s boring administrative tasks. Mike decides that he is going to convince Trent to let him return the money to the bank.


The day after visiting his grandfather, Mike messages him to say that the $1000 is not entirely legal and not to tell anyone where he got it from.


A week later, on a tip-off, the police visit Mike’s apartment and search it (note: the warrant and search are legal). They find $17,500 in cash and whilst conducting the search also discover in the oven the package that contains 50g of cocaine.


The police track down the missing $1000 cash to Mike’s grandfather.


Referring to unit materials answer the following:


a)Consider the criminal liability of Mike in relation to the cash, and any relevant defences.(15 marks)



b)Consider the criminal liability of Mike in relation to the cocaine.(10 marks)



c)Consider the criminal liability of Mike’s grandfather in relation to the $1000.(5 marks)









PART B
: Critical Reflection (15 marks)




Part B should be max. 750 words.


The experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples with the criminal justice system are complex. The complexities are shaped by the historical and political context of our legal system. Referring to the study materials covered in this unit, critically reflect onthe relationship between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoplesand the criminal law in Australia by focusing on one or more relevant key issues.


In doing so, consider the impact which the relevant study materials have had on shaping your understanding of how Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are treated in the Australian criminal justice system. Use the following questions as prompts:


·Did the content of the study materials tie in with your pre-existing knowledge?



·Did the above content challenge the way you think, or did it affirm what you already knew?



·What are, in your view, the most important issues relating to the treatment of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples by the criminal law system in Australia? Explain your view.



·Do you have any suggestions about how to improve the current situation?



Your answer should not be limited to only addressing the above prompts, which are just a guide.




Answered 1 days AfterJun 13, 2021

Answer To: PART A: Problem Question (30 marks) Part A should be max. 1250 words. Mike is a university student...

Sanjukta answered on Jun 14 2021
129 Votes
3
Criminal Law
Table of Contents
Part A: Problem question    3
Part B: Critical Reflection    6
References    9
Part A: Problem question
a)
It has been observed in the case study that Mike did not wanted to take out the cash in the first place but he did that simply because of his classmate who might have some safety problems. However, it was known to him that one of the ATM in the branch was out of ord
er so it was not at all meant for taking out cash. Even the manager of the ATM had mentioned Mike that the ATM was unnecessarily letting huge amount of money as the security system had a problem still Mike took the risk decision for taking out the money that landed him into a lot of trouble.
It is a known fact that the transactions that take place through the automatic teller machines as well as computerised cash payments at present are extremely widespread the criminal law connecting to their misuse remains quite confused. As the withdrawal of cash by Mike falls under the tag of “Unauthorised” so he can be subjected as both frauds along with theft. Furthermore, he might be charged with other offences also as he was informed by the manager beforehand only that the ATM was not working (Sankhwar and Pandey, 2016).
Throwing light on the above-mentioned discussion it can be said that as this falls under the category of the ATM fraud and the penalties related to the fraud might vary whether Mike will be charged at the federal or state level and the particular crimes that he is accused of. It is quite evident that Mike might face jail sentences as well as fines imposed on him. This particular fraud can be subjected under “ATM withdrawal fraud”
However, on the contrary, in case of defences it can be argued that this case might not be as strong as other ATM fraud cases considering the fact that Mike was in a hurry and his only intention to withdraw the money from ATM was to save his classmate as he was worried about his safety. This can be presented as a defence as Mike was not aware that his actions were fraudulent or dishonest and it can be clearly seen in this scenario. Mike was without a subjective awareness that he is committing a fraud, and then he cannot be convicted of this particular offense. Moreover, instead Mike has fair opportunity to present that Trent blackmailed him unnecessarily that compelled him to withdraw cash from the ATM machine where he worked as a teller and he did it instantly as time was running out and he did not wanted any harm for the girl with whom he used to study in the University Library regularly. Blackmail is one of the most sensationalised crimes in the Australia as well as everywhere in the world. In Australia the offence of blackmail is mainly created by the section 87 concerning the Crimes Act 1958. Section 87 (3) provides that an individual is guilty of the blackmail is an indictable offence along with it Trent the classmate of Mike might be liable to the level 4 presentment that is 15 years maximum. In other words or in the criminal codes it can be stated that some of the states have defined the term blackmailing is simply by establishing some of the statues listing the components that whenever satisfied highlights the fact that blackmail has been carried out. The charge of the blackmail concerning Trent can be to a great extent as Trent is also suspected to be associated some of the illegal activities such as drug dealing. Another possible defence in this case might be Mike has the right to be free from any unreasonable seizure and search could be violated if the police uses a defective warrant for seizing evidence of the evidence. Additionally, as there has been the right to be free’s violation from the unreasonable seizure and search hence a defence lawyer also have some of the most significant chances to exclude any evidence that is gathered by the police by the virtue of the illegal search. Moreover, Mike can also tell the concerned authority that he was also planning to convince Trent to let him return the money that he took from the ATM. In the concluding...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here