Please I’m doing this for my son.
Faculty of Higher Education RES501-Sem1-2020 Supplementary Assessment Criteria Prepared by: Laura Fleming ©William Angliss Institute Page 1 of 6 Supplementary Assessment Criteria, Semester 1, 2020 Please note, all Faculty Assessment Regulations must be adhered to. If you are unfamiliar with these guidelines these can be found on the MyWAI portal under Higher Education under the headings of: Faculty Assessment Regulations Please note that these regulations consider all aspects of academic integrity. You must submit brand new material (you cannot copy and paste from previous works) Assessment due: Sunday 12th July 2020 by 11:59pm. There are no extensions available for this assessment. Late assessments will not be marked. Assessment submission: You must submit your assessment to the email address
[email protected]. Your assessment will be submitted at the time this assessment is emailed to this address. After you have submitted your assessment through email it will be independently submitted to Turnitin where it will be checked for similarity. Assessment crosscheck session: You must also schedule a Zoom meeting with Laura Fleming for a 10 minute Q&A session about your submission. This must be scheduled for Monday 13th July 2020. You will not be eligible to pass the subject if you do not attend this scheduled meeting. Assessment mark: You will not receive a mark for this assessment, it will result in either a Supplementary Pass or Fail for the subject. Subject outcome: If this assessment receives a pass overall you will receive a Supplementary Pass for the overall subject. If the supplementary assessment is failed it will be externally moderated. If the fail mark is upheld you are awarded your cumulative mark for the semesters studies. The criteria for your assessment has been set over the page. http://mywai.angliss.edu.au/images/stories/degrees/HE-General-Docs/FHE_Assessment_Regulations.pdf http://mywai.angliss.edu.au/images/stories/degrees/HE-General-Docs/FHE_Assessment_Regulations.pdf mailto:
[email protected] Faculty of Higher Education RES501-Sem1-2020 Supplementary Assessment Criteria Prepared by: Laura Fleming ©William Angliss Institute Page 2 of 6 The following criteria has been set to allow for the RES501 FACS supplementary assessment Assessment Type Essay Word Limit: 1,500 words Due date: Sunday 12th July 2020 Essay Topic – Note this is a country specific topic and your research, references and discussion must reflect this. In Australia’s Higher Education system, using or claiming the work or ideas of someone else without acknowledgement, in your assessments, is wrong. Support or refute the above statement, making reference to existing and credible research (minimum of six sources aged within at least five to seven years of this assessment – references published between 2012 & 2020) on the topic to provide a strong basis for your argument position. When answering this style of essay you are to consider the above topic statement from more than one point of view and provide supported, credibly referenced arguments for and against the main ideas and draw a conclusion. Possible (but not limited to) areas for your research and argument; Ethics and integrity – moral implications Trust issues – breach of trust - fellow students, teachers, employees, customers, community Academic issues – reasons for referencing, academic capability, idea development Societal issues – cultural issues, advancement / continuing development of knowledge Your response must show evidence of having consulted a wide range of credible reference sources (minimum of six) including textbooks, peer reviewed journals and periodicals to support you in your discussion and argument. This assessment task is to be presented in essay format. A rubric is provided on the following pages for students to be aware of relevant academic skills areas their work will be marked against. Document layout requirements for both of these assessments are as follows: Header containing student name and identification Footer containing teachers name, subject code and page numbers 12pt font, line spacing of either 1.5 or double, paragraph spacing of 10pt (minimum) Page breaks between all pages Faculty of Higher Education RES501-Sem1-2020 Supplementary Assessment Criteria Prepared by: Laura Fleming ©William Angliss Institute Page 3 of 6 Supplementary Assessment: Argumentative Essay (Full) Marking Rubric Guide 1. Limitations 0 Does not meet 1500 word length (+ / - 20%) excluding Reference List 1 Meets 1500 word length (+ / - 20%) excluding Reference List 2. Similarity 0 Body of paper (Reference List excluded) exceeds allowable similarity amounts of overall similarity of 20% or one or more individual source similarity of 6% 1 Body of paper’s (Reference List excluded) overall similarity is between 1% and 20% and has between one and three individual sources with similarity of between 4% and 6% indicating excessive use of quotes and/or poor paraphrasing /summarising skills in students in-text reference information usage 2 Body of paper (Reference List excluded) overall similarity is between 1% and 20% and individual sources with similarity of between 1% and 3% indicating minimal use of quotes and appropriate use of paraphrasing /summarising skills in students in-text reference information usage 3. In-text Referencing 0 Does not contain any in text references or has an extensive number of referencing errors demonstrating student does not know APA 6th Edition referencing system 1 Paper has minor in-text referencing errors, such as not having the minimum number (6) of relevant and credible (majority within 5-7 year age range) references, APA 6th Edition referencing format errors (i.e. quotes/paraphrasing missing page and/or paragraph number), and/or references that do not also appear in the Reference List 2 Contains eight (8) or more relevant and credible (majority within 5-7 year age range) in text APA 6th Edition references, with minor in-text referencing errors, such as APA referencing format errors (i.e. quotes/paraphrasing missing page and/or paragraph number), and/or references that do not also appear in the Reference List 3 Contains minimum number (6) of relevant and credible (majority within 5-7 year age range) in text APA references, each correctly APA 6th Edition formatted and all exist in the Reference List 4 Contains 8 or more relevant and credible (majority within 5-7 year age range) references, each correctly APA 6th Edition formatted and all exist in the Reference List Faculty of Higher Education RES501-Sem1-2020 Supplementary Assessment Criteria Prepared by: Laura Fleming ©William Angliss Institute Page 4 of 6 4. Reference List 0 Paper does not contain a Reference List or Reference List has a very high level of errors, such as incorrect referencing style demonstrating student does not know the APA 6th Edition referencing system, missing required information (i.e. full journal name, all authors), not also being used in-text, majority outside of 5-7 year age range etc… 1 Paper contains a Reference List with minor errors such as references that do not appear in-text, not meeting required minimum number (6) of