PLEASE READ THE INSTRUCTIONS. This is Doctoral work!!Turnitin and Waypoint are being used to check for plagiarism, and please use APA format. Please pay close attention I NEED INSTRUCTIONS TO BE READ...

1 answer below »



PLEASE READ THE INSTRUCTIONS. This is Doctoral work!!


Turnitin and Waypoint are being used to check for plagiarism, and please use APA format. Please pay close attention I NEED INSTRUCTIONS TO BE READ THROUGHLY AND FOLLOWED, to plagiarism, it's not tolerated. make sure to use in-text citations demonstrating that I am citing my references. Please do not use fake references, this instructor will check, and this instructor will check Please keep plagiarism under! 0% or lower. VERY IMPORTANT. Let’s make sure all questions are covered and answered.











Case Scenario: Implementing Performance Measurement Systems [WLOs: 3 and 4] [CLOs: 1, 2, and 3] There are several types of measures and methods for assessing performance: job results/outcomes, essay methods, ranking, forced distribution, behavioral checklists, behavioral anchored rating scales (BARS), and management by objectives (MBO). Prior to beginning this assignment, please read Chapter 4: Defining Performance and Choosing a Measurement Approach and Chapter 5: Measuring Results and Behaviors of the course text to learn about key considerations in choosing one type of measurement procedure over another. For this assignment, you will be assessing comparative and absolute performance measurement systems to be considered for implementation. PART I: Comparative Performance Measurement System As the human resources manager of an HR team of 30 individuals in a mid-sized construction company, you decide to implement a comparative performance measurement system to measure performance in your department. · Assess the advantages and disadvantages of implementing a comparative performance measurement system. · Explain three to five types of comparative performance measurement systems that are available for you to consider. · Choose one approach and explain how you would implement it in your department. · Explain why your selection was the best choice among the variety of comparative performance measurement systems. PART II: Absolute Performance Measurement System At the end of the year, a company-wide initiative calls for a revision of the performance measurement systems. Every manager including you, will be required to develop an absolute performance measurement system. The process is complicated by the fact that many of your direct reports are remote employees who interact via email and phone rather than in person. · Assess the advantages and disadvantages of implementing an absolute performance measurement system. · Explain three to five types of absolute performance measurement systems. · Choose one approach and explain how you would implement an absolute performance measurement system in your department next year, recognizing that you have limited time to devote to your department as you will be supporting other departments for the implementation in their areas. · Explain what you will consider in choosing an absolute performance measurement system. PART III: Compare and Contrast Please decide which performance measurement system will work best for your department. · Compare and contrast the two performance measurement systems. · Choose one performance measurement system that you feel will best work for your department. · Give a rationale for your decision. · Support your statements with scholarly and/or credible sources. The Case Scenario: Implementing Performance Measurement Systems paper · must be three to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center Links to an external site.. · must include a separate title page with the following: · Title of paper · Student’s name · Course name and number · Instructor’s name · Date submitted · must use at least two scholarly and/or credible sources, in addition to the course text
Answered 1 days AfterSep 27, 2023

Answer To: PLEASE READ THE INSTRUCTIONS. This is Doctoral work!!Turnitin and Waypoint are being used to check...

Dipali answered on Sep 28 2023
19 Votes
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT        6
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT
Table of contents
Introduction    3
Part I: Comparative Performance Measurement System    3
Advantages and Disadvantages of Comparative Performance Measurement    3
Types of Comparative Performance Measurement Systems    3
Implementing BA
RS in the HR Department    4
Part II: Absolute Performance Measurement System    5
Advantages and Disadvantages of Absolute Performance Measurement    5
Types of Absolute Performance Measurement Systems    5
Implementing KPIs in the HR Department    5
Part III: Compare and Contrast    6
Comparing Comparative and Absolute Performance Measurement Systems    6
Choosing the Best Performance Measurement System for the HR Department    7
Rationale    7
References    8
Introduction
For organizations to evaluate employee performance, set targets, and make educated decisions about performance improvement, effective performance assessment tools are essential. We will look at the benefits and drawbacks of using both comparative and absolute performance monitoring techniques in this essay. We will also look at several measuring systems within each area and choose the best strategy for the HR division of a mid-sized construction business. The two systems will be compared and contrasted in order to decide which one would work best for the department, and a justification for the choice will be given.
Part I: Comparative Performance Measurement System
Advantages and Disadvantages of Comparative Performance Measurement
There are several benefits to putting in place a comparative performance monitoring system (Kamble & Gunasekaran, 2020). It permits employee rating and distinction on a relative basis, making it simpler to see great performers and those who need to grow. It can also encourage healthy rivalry among workers, which could boost output and motivation. However, there are drawbacks to take into account, including the potential for demonization for individuals who routinely receive lower rankings and the ability to develop a competitive workplace.
Types of Comparative Performance Measurement Systems
· Ranking: Employees are ranked using this method from the best performance to the worst. While this technique is simple, lower-level employees may get demotivated as a result.
· Forced Distribution: Employees are divided into performance categories that have already been established, maintaining a constant distribution of scores. This may not precisely reflect individual performance, but it can be helpful for distinguishing top and poor performers.
· Behavioral Anchored Rating Scales (BARS): BARS offers a more thorough perspective of employee performance by fusing behavioral descriptors with numerical assessments. Although it provides more thorough...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here