SOCIAL ANALYSIS OF A PUBLIC HEALTH ISSUE Assessment overview Due Date: Friday May 31, 2pm Weight: 40% Description: Social analysis of a public health issue of a vulnerable population in a location of...

1 answer below »
Social analysis of a public health issue of a vulnerable population in a location of your choice.


SOCIAL ANALYSIS OF A PUBLIC HEALTH ISSUE Assessment overview Due Date: Friday May 31, 2pm Weight: 40% Description: Social analysis of a public health issue of a vulnerable population in a location of your choice Assessment description Your task is conduct a social analysis and write a case study of up to 2200 words. Undertaking a social analysis is a core public health skill. You are required to apply the components of what you have learnt in PUBH7620 to the investigation of a public health issue, in a vulnerable population, in a location of your choice. Components 1. Choose a public health issue 2. Choose a vulnerable population that is at risk and or/affected by the public health issue in the location. 3. Choose a geographical location where this public health issue is prevalent. 4. Write a social analysis of the health issue in the population group, in the location using academic/ peer reviewed literature In writing your case study you need to address the following:  What is the health issue, locality and vulnerable population? How is the health issue socially distributed in the locality?  What are the social determinants linked to the health issue that are experienced by your vulnerable population?  What are the social, cultural and political impacts of the public health issue on the vulnerable population in your country/location?  How is the health issue socially constructed for your vulnerable population (e.g., issues of stigma, discrimination, victim blaming)?  What is the response of the chosen vulnerable group to the public health issue?  Critically assess the country/ service provision response to this issue.  What research/further information is needed to understand the issue?  Propose a public health response to this issue (using an upstream, mid-stream and/or downstream approach to the social determinants of health) outlining a rationale for your proposed response. Assignment Format Requirements Please ensure that your assignment complies with the following formatting specifications.  Assessment cover sheet: Please sign and attach the assessment cover sheet (available in the assessment tab on the course BB site) to the front of your submission. Typing your name in the Cover Sheet Declaration will suffice as your signature that the work has not been plagiarised.  Writing style: The social analysis should be written in good academic English and draw on course readings and additional literature.  Word limit: As indicated above the social analysis should be no more than 2200 words. Please note this does not include the reference list.  Paper Size: Standard A4 (210 x 297mm)  Margins: All margins at least 2.0cm  Font: At least 11 point and Times New Roman only  Line spacing: 1.5 line spacing  References: Harvard or APA style. Attach references as a separate page at the end of your assignment. Each week's journal submission must contain appropriate referencing - you must reference all sources used.  File Name: LastName_PUBH7620 Social analysis  Submission: Via the submission link on the course Blackboard site by Midnight EST Friday 1 June 2018. 2018 PUBH7620 Social Analysis Marking Rubric Criteria Fail (<50%) pass (50-64%) credit (65-74%) distinction (75-84%) high distinction (≥85%) assignment responds directly to the assessment task and addresses questions outlined for the social analysis (50%) poor or no application to assessment task some evidence of social analysis of health issue but difficult to follow and/or few points made. some work is focused on the aims and themes of the assignment, but not all questions are followed. largely descriptive accounts. not terribly cohesive. solid social analysis, some key questions explored and some attempt to critically discuss topic. has addressed the main purpose of the assignment, but flow is not seamless. good social analysis, key questions explored and critically discussed. has addressed the purpose of the assignment coherently. evidence of good critical thought; however lacks depth of analysis and thinking. good synthesis of the literature throughout the argument, but could be more active in the use of the literature and in presenting the argument excellent well -developed social analysis, key questions addressed in sophisticated manner and critically discussed. logical and interesting. has addressed the purpose of the assignment comprehensively and imaginatively. outstanding. all questions are addressed thoroughly and critically. very active and highly polished academic writing. evidence of critical analysis (20%) no evidence of critical analysis largely descriptive. some critical analysis may be present but difficult to follow solid critical analysis but limited, still descriptive in parts good critical analysis but lacking in originality well-developed critical analysis, some originality and confidence. evidence of literature that is relevant, and supports the argument (20%) no literature described limited literature used in presenting the argument. few references, often not of high academic standard (eg reliance on websites) some literature searched and presented but the use is still relatively descriptive. good engagement with the literature. demonstrates some breadth of reading. excellent and thorough literature search presented. references are used well and interwoven throughout. literature is used, critically considered and synthesised. scholarly presentation 10% large number of grammatical, spelling and/or punctuation errors. english construction is incomprehensible. very poor formatting. no literature cited or referencing style is very poor. incomplete acknowledgement of work of others (plagiarism). a number of grammatical, spelling and/or punctuation errors. some problems with english expression. not well formatted. some literature cited, but not enough, not used effectively, lack of current literature or not relevant. some grammatical, spelling and/or punctuation errors. english expression is sound. well formatted. some appropriate literature cited, but some points not supported by citations. presentation is well written. some minor grammatical, spelling and/or punctuation errors. good use of english language. very well formatted. most content relevantly cited. presentation is cohesively written. clear format. very few grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. excellent use of english language. excellent formatting. polished. all relevant essay content is referenced appropriately comments: page 1 of 1 page 2 of 1 pass="" (50-64%)="" credit="" (65-74%)="" distinction="" (75-84%)="" high="" distinction="" (≥85%)="" assignment="" responds="" directly="" to="" the="" assessment="" task="" and="" addresses="" questions="" outlined="" for="" the="" social="" analysis="" (50%)="" poor="" or="" no="" application="" to="" assessment="" task="" some="" evidence="" of="" social="" analysis="" of="" health="" issue="" but="" difficult="" to="" follow="" and/or="" few="" points="" made.="" some="" work="" is="" focused="" on="" the="" aims="" and="" themes="" of="" the="" assignment,="" but="" not="" all="" questions="" are="" followed.="" largely="" descriptive="" accounts.="" not="" terribly="" cohesive.="" solid="" social="" analysis,="" some="" key="" questions="" explored="" and="" some="" attempt="" to="" critically="" discuss="" topic.="" has="" addressed="" the="" main="" purpose="" of="" the="" assignment,="" but="" flow="" is="" not="" seamless.="" good="" social="" analysis,="" key="" questions="" explored="" and="" critically="" discussed.="" has="" addressed="" the="" purpose="" of="" the="" assignment="" coherently.="" evidence="" of="" good="" critical="" thought;="" however="" lacks="" depth="" of="" analysis="" and="" thinking.="" good="" synthesis="" of="" the="" literature="" throughout="" the="" argument,="" but="" could="" be="" more="" active="" in="" the="" use="" of="" the="" literature="" and="" in="" presenting="" the="" argument="" excellent="" well="" -developed="" social="" analysis,="" key="" questions="" addressed="" in="" sophisticated="" manner="" and="" critically="" discussed.="" logical="" and="" interesting.="" has="" addressed="" the="" purpose="" of="" the="" assignment="" comprehensively="" and="" imaginatively.="" outstanding.="" all="" questions="" are="" addressed="" thoroughly="" and="" critically.="" very="" active="" and="" highly="" polished="" academic="" writing.="" evidence="" of="" critical="" analysis="" (20%)="" no="" evidence="" of="" critical="" analysis="" largely="" descriptive.="" some="" critical="" analysis="" may="" be="" present="" but="" difficult="" to="" follow="" solid="" critical="" analysis="" but="" limited,="" still="" descriptive="" in="" parts="" good="" critical="" analysis="" but="" lacking="" in="" originality="" well-developed="" critical="" analysis,="" some="" originality="" and="" confidence.="" evidence="" of="" literature="" that="" is="" relevant,="" and="" supports="" the="" argument="" (20%)="" no="" literature="" described="" limited="" literature="" used="" in="" presenting="" the="" argument.="" few="" references,="" often="" not="" of="" high="" academic="" standard="" (eg="" reliance="" on="" websites)="" some="" literature="" searched="" and="" presented="" but="" the="" use="" is="" still="" relatively="" descriptive.="" good="" engagement="" with="" the="" literature.="" demonstrates="" some="" breadth="" of="" reading.="" excellent="" and="" thorough="" literature="" search="" presented.="" references="" are="" used="" well="" and="" interwoven="" throughout.="" literature="" is="" used,="" critically="" considered="" and="" synthesised.="" scholarly="" presentation="" 10%="" large="" number="" of="" grammatical,="" spelling="" and/or="" punctuation="" errors.="" english="" construction="" is="" incomprehensible.="" very="" poor="" formatting.="" no="" literature="" cited="" or="" referencing="" style="" is="" very="" poor.="" incomplete="" acknowledgement="" of="" work="" of="" others="" (plagiarism).="" a="" number="" of="" grammatical,="" spelling="" and/or="" punctuation="" errors.="" some="" problems="" with="" english="" expression.="" not="" well="" formatted.="" some="" literature="" cited,="" but="" not="" enough,="" not="" used="" effectively,="" lack="" of="" current="" literature="" or="" not="" relevant.="" some="" grammatical,="" spelling="" and/or="" punctuation="" errors.="" english="" expression="" is="" sound.="" well="" formatted.="" some="" appropriate="" literature="" cited,="" but="" some="" points="" not="" supported="" by="" citations.="" presentation="" is="" well="" written.="" some="" minor="" grammatical,="" spelling="" and/or="" punctuation="" errors.="" good="" use="" of="" english="" language.="" very="" well="" formatted.="" most="" content="" relevantly="" cited.="" presentation="" is="" cohesively="" written.="" clear="" format.="" very="" few="" grammatical,="" spelling="" or="" punctuation="" errors.="" excellent="" use="" of="" english="" language.="" excellent="" formatting.="" polished.="" all="" relevant="" essay="" content="" is="" referenced="" appropriately="" comments:="" page="" 1="" of="" 1="" page="" 2="" of="">
Answered Same DayMar 03, 2021

Answer To: SOCIAL ANALYSIS OF A PUBLIC HEALTH ISSUE Assessment overview Due Date: Friday May 31, 2pm Weight:...

Kuldeep answered on Apr 03 2021
131 Votes
Public Health Issue
(
qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm
qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklz
xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqw
ertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm
)
    Topic: Public Health Issue
Student Name:
University Name:
Unit Name:
Date:
Contents
Choose a public health issue    2
Choose a vulnerable population that is at risk and or/affected by the public health issue in the location.    3
Choose a geographical location where this public health issue is prevalent.    5
What are the social, cultural and political impacts of the public health issue on the vulnerable population in your country/location?    6
What are the social determinants linked to the health issue that are experienced by your vulnerable population?    8
How the health issue is socially constructed for your vulnerable population (e.g., issues of stigma, discrimination, victim blaming)?    9
What is the response of the chosen vulnerable group to the public health issue?    10
Critically assess the country/ service provision response to this issue.    11
Propose a public health response to this issue (using an upstream, mid-stream and/or downstream    12
Conclusion    13
References    14
Choose a public health issue
Mental health statistics show that indigenous people are more likely to suffer from depression or dementia than other Australians. Mental well being is a phrase that covers a variety of situations and experiences that individuals can feel the both physically and mentally. This is the umbrella term that includes a continuum from most serious illnesses to various and ordinary mental well being issues and mild symptom of varying duration and intensity. The definition of the mental health is private, based on the individual's life experience and life background (Acharya, 2018). “Psychological well being can be also influenced by our social class, gender, religious or family life experiences.” “Psychological health is described as the multifaceted six-dimensional behavior, emotion, spirit, cognition, psychology, and social politics.” In 1997, the Health Education Administration defined mental well being as “the spiritual and gender resilience that enable us to endure sadness, disappointment and pain”. “This is the basic belief in the dignity and worth of us and others.
The Mental Health Foundation defines mentally healthy person as being able to “confident and confident; to develop emotionally, intellectually, spiritually and creatively,; to initiate, expand and maintain mutually satisfying own relationships; to be alert of others as well as to sympathize with them; Issues, solve problems or learn from them; utilize and enjoy loneliness; play, have, laugh, fun; whether in yourself or in the world (Arsenijevic, Pavlova & Groot, 2015). The lack of emotional health and mental illness refers to existence of positive mind, allowing you to laugh, "They can continue their normal life"
Choose a vulnerable population that is at risk and or/affected by the public health issue in the location.
There is the special challenge in all the aspects of recurrence prevention recognized in this mono-graph for the indigenous people and the Torres Strait Islander. Fundamentally, this problem should be considered in broader contexts, that is, the emotional and social well-being of indigenous people and Torres Strait Islander people is a major health problem in Australia and source of the national shame. Most jurisdictions do not provide a wide range of culturally appropriate mental health services, and providing basic health as well as community services is a basic and urgent need of indigenous communities (Hatzenbuehler, 2010).
It should be noted that indigenous residents or Torres Strait Islander people include people living in various cities, remote and rural areas, traditional moreover other environments. Therefore, it is too simplistic to publish statements that may apply to every indigenous people and the Torres Strait Islander people. In addition, the problems described in lots of other section of this paper, particularly those related to remote and rural communities as well as to socio-financial disadvantages, also apply. A recent most important initiative on mental health is National Strategic Frame work for Mental Health and Emotional and Social Health of Aboriginal or the Torres Strait Islander People, 2004-2009. This document describes the specific challenges of indigenous people and Torres Strait Islander mental health. Prioritize overall health care and recognize the interrelated states of the physical and sexual identity of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and people, employment, gender and sexual identity, education, family relationships, community relations and the spirituality (Hultman, Alm, Cederborg & Fälth Magnusson, 2011). The cultural safety practices of indigenous and Torres Strait Islander people are particularly important in the absence of indigenous community medical practices in remote areas of Australia, where “non-existing doctor/indigenous patient interactions have serious and unrecognized misinformation ".
This is also true in cities, because error transmission can occur at all levels, and there may be serious symptoms and behavioral misunderstandings in the context of mental health. When used with an indigenous person, it can cause various reactions, based on their stage of education, information and the method they utilize the language. These meanings focus on people's experiences in the mental health services of their relatives and the behaviors of people they hear or see when they experience mental illness. The actuality is that the mental illnesses are difficult to know and often bring fear or considerable stigma to...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here