As this is a summative submission of formative work, all learning outcomes are addressed 1. Critically assess the processes by which organisations innovate to sustain and improve their performance. 2....

1 answer below »
The 750 words is not required as it has to be done by me. Please focus on the 1250 words that is based on my previous assignment which I will submit to you shortly.


As this is a summative submission of formative work, all learning outcomes are addressed 1. Critically assess the processes by which organisations innovate to sustain and improve their performance. 2. Critically evaluate and select suitable business processes to facilitate sustainability within a business organisation that operates in a global context. 3. Have the competencies to be a digitally literate professional. ASSESSMENT SPECIFICATION The third and final assessment on the module requires you to: 1. Submit a 1250 word report (excluding references, tables and diagrams) on your report, the title of which has been developed through your work in Assessment 1 and can be amended here in line with feedback you have received on Assessment 1. 2. Submit your work on exploring the social media conversations related to your report topic, showing the work you have done in creating data visualisations and analysing your results. (750 words excluding diagrams). The two items above need to be submitted as ONE overall report in MS Word or pdf format. 3. Additional submission of your TAGs spreadsheet required. This is not assessed, it is required for purposes of validating your submitted work. However, Non-Submission of the spreadsheet will result in TEN marks being deducted from your Analysis of Social Media Conversations. Weightings for each item are shown below. Guidance Report (1250 words, 60%) This report addresses your report title which is related to reporting on progress in Business towards one target of your chosen Sustainable Development Goal. The report should represent an attempt to assess Business progress in meeting the target, through critical evaluation of secondary data sources. A suggested structure and word count allocation is given below: 1. Introduction clearly setting out the report title and stating the Goal and Target chosen and how this has been refined. (50 words) 2. Methodology for searches of the academic literature and other sources (200 words) 3. Summary of Research Findings and Critical Analysis (850 words) 4. Conclusions (150 words) 5. References (single reference list at the end of document) Analysis of Social Media conversations (750 words, 40%) Through the workshops on the module, you will have gathered substantial data on social media conversations related to your research and have established a collection of data visualisations of this using Tableau Software. You are required to produce a critical analysis of your results. In order to do this, you must select the most pertinent visualisations you have produced. The expected structure with word count guidance is: 1. Introduction – a brief overview of the contents of your analysis. (50 words) 2. Search Methodology – an explanation of your search terms, building on your work in Assessment One and an explanation of limitations of your analysis. (200 words 3. Presentation of Results and critical analysis (400 words). Presentation of data visualisations MUST follow the naming conventions for each Figure covered in the workshops. 4. Conclusions (100 words). 5. References (single reference list at the end of document).
Answered Same DayNov 25, 2020

Answer To: As this is a summative submission of formative work, all learning outcomes are addressed 1....

Soumi answered on Dec 01 2020
134 Votes
REPORT TITLE: EVALUATION OF REGULATIONS AND PROGRESS TOWARDS THE PROTECTION AND REPLENISHMENT OF STOCKS IN THE FISHERIES INDUSTRY
STUDENT ID: ______________
DATE OF SUBMISSION: _________________
WORD COUNT FOR TASK 1: 1324
TOTAL WORD COUNT: 1324
Goal 14: Life below water
Target 4: By 2020, effectively regulate harvesting and end overfishing, illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing and destructive fi
shing practices and implement science-based management plans, in order to restore fish stocks in the shortest time feasible, at least to levels that can produce maximum sustainable yield as determined by their biological characteristics
Table of Contents
1. Report on Evaluation of Regulations and Progress towards the Protection and Replenishment of Stocks in the Fisheries Industry    3
1.1 Introduction    3
1.2 Methodology for Searches of Academic Literature and Other Sources    3
1.3 Summary of Research Findings and Critical Analysis    3
1.4 Conclusions    5
2. Analysis of Social Media Conversations    6
3. References    7
1. Report on Evaluation of Regulations and Progress towards the Protection and Replenishment of Stocks in the Fisheries Industry
1.1 Introduction
The report focuses on the evaluation of the regulations that are existing for the effective management of fishing practices. The goal is number 14— “Life under the water” and the target is to regulate the harvesting practices by 2020, by ending overfishing, indiscriminate fishing, illegal, destructive and unreported fishing practices. These could be done by implementing scientific management plans that can succeed in restoring fish stocks within very less time, up to a level that can at least produce the highest amount of yield as per their biological capacities in order to sustain the fish breed. This target has been refined by analysing the progress that has taken place so far in the context of protecting and replenishing the fish stock in the fishery industry. The report presents a methodology for searching literature and other information, followed by analysing the findings in this context and finally, drawing conclusions from them.
1.2 Methodology for Searches of Academic Literature and Other Sources
This report has been constructed by gathering information from both the academic and non-academic sources that pertain to the sustainable practices of fishing as well as in fishery industry. For the previous assignment, Twitter was searched for conversation on the topic. However, for this report, since authentic literature was needed; therefore, literature search has been done from databases such as Science Direct, Wiley Online Library and Nature. As mentioned by Koretsune et al. (2017), databases have a vast range of peer-reviewed journal articles, which are authentic scholarly sources and provide latest information.
On the other hand, for non-academic sources, Google was used as a browser and reputed newspaper sites such as The Guardian were searched for news on the issue. Search terms such as aquaculture, overfishing, climate action, coastal fisheries, unregulated fishing, regulations on fishing practices and Sustainable Development Goal number 14 (SDG14) were used for literature search. Apart from these, other sources were also used in this report, in order to support or criticise the searched information. Critical analysis was conducted in order to evaluate the present progress of the prevailing regulations on fishery industry. It was analysed whether the fish stokes could be replenished and protected or not.
1.3 Summary of Research Findings and Critical Analysis
Currently, the strategies and regulations that have been implemented for the conservation of the fishery industry have been only partially successful in the aim of protecting the fish population. They have aimed to protect the stocks and refill them in case there has been overexploitation of this organism; however, the speed, with which the overexploitation or unregulated activities are taking place, is a lot faster than the effectiveness of these regulations. Therefore, as viewed by Lauck et al. (1998), there is still a...
SOLUTION.PDF

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

More Questions »

Submit New Assignment

Copy and Paste Your Assignment Here