The topic is to implement the use of technology in hotels operations. I'm focusing on using mobile phones as a check-in device and key for the room to help check-in process quicker and safe the environment by reducing paper waste and plastic waste to make physical keys
Faculty of Higher Education HOH729 July 2021 – May 2022 Prepared by: Kylie Sweetman ©William Angliss Institute Page 1 of 3 Assessment 1 Part B Literature Review and Research Design & Methodology Due Date: Monday 14th February 2022, 11.59pm Assessment Method: Submit via Turnitin in Microsoft WORD format Word Count: 1,500 words Weighting: 25% Details: Critically review the literature relevant to your individual research topic. A selection of both academic and industry literature should be reviewed for this assessment. Make sure you use current articles and include a discussion of the theoretical frameworks as illustrated by the key authors in this field. Based on your review, formulate your research design, including the methodology you will use. You are required to review a minimum of 10 academic references and 5 industry references. *** Please ensure you review the PowerPoint presentation on Moodle. Faculty of Higher Education HOH729 July 2021 – May 2022 Prepared by: Julie London ©William Angliss Institute Page 2 of 3 Assessment 1 Part B – Literature Review and Research Design & Methodology Category Unsatisfactory Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction ORIGINALITY and WORD COUNT COMPLIANCE Originality score + 20%. Single originality +6%. Words +/ -20%. Originality score equal to or below 20%. Originality matches equal to or below 6% to one source. Word count under 20% +/- the specified requirement. Structure Structure does not follow suggested format Structure follows suggested format - Is presented as a literature review Written work 10% Unclear writing style Unacceptable professionalism: spelling, grammar, punctuation, paragraph structure and page formatting. Clear writing style Acceptable professionalism: spelling, grammar, punctuation, paragraph structure and page formatting. Relevant and logical sequence of argument Sound professionalism: spelling, grammar, punctuation, paragraph structure and page formatting. Relevant and detailed sequence of argument Good professionalism: spelling, grammar, punctuation, paragraph structure and page formatting. Relevant and complex sequence of argument Excellent professionalism: spelling, grammar, punctuation, paragraph structure and page formatting. Introduction 10% Does not provide clear direction of the review or initial findings Shows basic scope of the review and initial findings Clearly shows the scope and initial findings and limitations of the submission Faculty of Higher Education HOH729 July 2021 – May 2022 Prepared by: Julie London ©William Angliss Institute Page 3 of 3 Critical selection of material 20% Fails to provide a sufficient and adequate list of appropriate sources. Most of the literature is irrelevant to the project, and or/ is of low academic quality. Does not identify a research gap in the published literature. Provides a minimally acceptable list of sources. There are many gaps in the materials and seminal papers are missing. There are insufficient high quality materials. Suggests a hurried process, with a minimal critical assessment of each article. Provides an acceptable list of sources. There are some gaps in the materials and some seminal papers may be missing. There are insufficient high quality materials. Suggests a mediocre level of critique in the selection of materials. May tend to “pad” the list of sources Provides a very good list of sources that represents the most up to date material in the field. The list includes older seminal works where necessary. Provides a broad range of materials, most of which are high quality academic, but also includes some non-academic materials for which their selection is justified. Demonstrates very good proficiency in selecting materials. Provides an excellent list of sources that represents the most up to date material in the field. The list includes older seminal works where necessary. Provides a broad range of materials, of high quality academic, and also includes some non- academic materials for which their selection is justified. Demonstrates a high level proficiency in critical selection of relevant literature. Critique 30% Does not provide a critique of the literature. Most of the literature is irrelevant to the project, and or/ is of low academic quality. Does not relate to the research topic or identify a research gap in the published literature. Provides a weak critique of the literature. Some material is irrelevant and/or of low academic quality. Might not identify the research topic or identify a research gap in the published literature clearly. Provides a good critique of mostly relevant literature. Material sourced is generally of a good academic quality, with an acceptable range of articles. Somewhat identifies the research topic and the research gap in the published literature. Indicates a good knowledge of the research in the field. Provides a very good critique of the most relevant literature. The range of material is very good. Clearly identifies the research topic and a research gap in the published literature. Provides an excellent understanding of the research in the field to date. Strong critique of the material with respect to the methods used and. Clearly identifies the research topic and a research gap in the published literature by providing an overall view and details of individual works. Research Design & Methodology 30% No research design and/or methodology. Simplistic research design and methodology. Thorough research design and methodology. Expansive research design and methodology. Extensive research design and methodology. Microsoft PowerPoint - HOH729 Literature review Workshop Dec 2021 LA final RTO No: 3045 CRICOS Provider No: 01505M HEP 9534 | Copyright all text and images William Angliss Institute unless otherwise stated WAI LEARNING ADVISOR LITERATURE REVIEW WORKSHOP HOH729 Professional Practice Project Learning Advisors | William Angliss Institute | 2021 RTO No: 3045 CRICOS Provider No: 01505M HEP 9534 | Copyright all text and images William Angliss Institute unless otherwise stated OVERVIEW Your problem statement-Assessment 1 Part A The workplace research process Assessment 1 Part B details Overview of the assessment task and rubric What is a literature review? A research matrix The structure of a literature review Critiquing and analysing literature: language examples Activity Research methodology This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY RTO No: 3045 CRICOS Provider No: 01505M HEP 9534 | Copyright all text and images William Angliss Institute unless otherwise stated PROBLEM STATEMENT FROM ASSESSMENT 1 PART A Forms basis of your literature search RTO No: 3045 CRICOS Provider No: 01505M HEP 9534 | Copyright all text and images William Angliss Institute unless otherwise stated THE PROCESS Your work problem Assessment 1 Part A Identified the department that you would like to focus on for your professional development and