Theoretical overview and critique - 2000 words (no more than 10% over the word limit) Due: Friday...

Question

Theoretical overview and critique - 2000 words (no more than 10% over the word limit) Due: Friday 20th September, 9am

Choose two (2) from the following list of theories for social work

• Systems theory in social work • Empowerment theory in social work • Strengths-based theory in social work • Relationship-based theory in social work

Review the literature on your chosen theories. For this 2000-word paper it is expected that you will demonstrate your depth of learning with the use of no less than 8 references from the variety of readings offered on FLO. **access the multiple readings via the Readings link on FLO

1. Clearly name and provide an overview for each of the two theories chosen. 2. Include a summary of the main argument presented for each of the two theories used in social work (approx. 1500 words) 3. Explore the strengths and possible limitations (this is the critique) for each theory (approx.500 words)

SOAD9060 Social Work Theories Rubric: theoretical overview, critique and reflection Name and FAN Criteria High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail Articulation of theory 30 marks Advanced articulation and summary of appropriate theories demonstrating complex understanding Concise, articulate summary of two appropriate theories Reasonable articulation and summary of two appropriate theories Adequate articulation and summary of two appropriate theories Limited articulation and summary and/ or theories chosen are not related to the topic Exploration of theory: strengths, possible limitations (critique) 30 marks High level of proficiency in the exploration and critique of the strengths and possible limitations of the chosen theories Advanced exploration and good critique that demonstrates engagement with the theories Exploration that provides a summary of theories to a sufficient standard Adequate summary of theories and demonstrates a beginning understanding No or limited summary and/or a focus on one area more than the other Use of scholarly literature to form interpretations and arguments 30 marks All arguments and interpretations are justified using references and formatting is accurate. Evidence of considerable additional research and referencing. All arguments and interpretations are justified using references. Formatting of referencing is accurate and demonstrates engagement with the readings with evidence of some extended reading Most arguments and interpretations are justified using references. Formatting of references is generally accurate. Demonstrates sufficient engagement with the readings from the topic Some arguments and interpretations are justified using references. Formatting of referencing is inconsistent. Demonstrates some engagement with the readings from the topic Minimal or no arguments and interpretations justified with references. References inaccurate or outside the scope of social work. Demonstrates minimal or no engagement with readings from the topic. Written presentation 10 marks Paper demonstrates excellent presentation with attention to detail. Clear structure and flow and written expression is fluent and eloquent. Referencing is clear and accurate Paper demonstrates good presentation. Structure includes a clear introduction and conclusion. Written expression is confident and flows well. Referencing is appropriate and informed Overall, the paper demonstrates sufficient presentation. Structure includes an introduction and conclusion. Written expression is generally clear with minimal errors in grammar and spelling. Referencing accurate and sufficient Overall, the paper demonstrates adequate presentation. Structure lacks clarity. Paragraph structure requires refinement. Written expression is generally understood with evidence of some errors in grammar and spelling. Errors in referencing, and requires more The paper demonstrates unclear and/or inconsistent presentation. Written expression is unclear, repetitive, with multiple grammar and spelling errors. Minimal, inaccurate or no referencing evident Feedback comments Final Mark /100

rubricass-1-b4c5srpo.docx

Rimsha · Accepted Answer

Running Head: OVERVIEW AND CRITIQUE OF THEORIES OF SOCIAL WORK	1
OVERVIEW AND CRITIQUE OF THEORIES OF SOCIAL WORK	4
OVERVIEW AND CRITIQUE OF THEORIES OF SOCIAL WORK
Table of Contents
Overviews of the theories	3
Strength-based theory	3
System theory	5
Critique of the theories	7
Strength and limitations of strength-based theory	7
Strength and limitation of system theory	8
References	10
Overviews of the theories
Strength-based theory
	The theory is considered as the base of the social work. This theory is also known as work-practice theory. As mentioned by Rashid (2015), strength-based theory focuses on the determination of the self. It focuses on the strength of the person. It helps in building of the client based on their strength. It considered client as resilient and resourceful individual especially in the time of the critical situation. This approach focused on the client centered and client led to focus the sets of strengths of the future. As suggested by Bozic, Lawthom, and Murray (2018), put stress on getting people to affect the change in them. According to this theory, change in the individual occur using positivity and affect them. Change is determine based on the reaction of the individual or the way they can take care of their own capacity, rights, quirks, and behavior towards similarities and dignity.  
	As suggested by Greene (2017), the approach used by strength-based theory is considered one of the most successful because this theory consider client as the agent of the change when they are provided with the environment for controlling change. The approach provided by strength-based theory is majorly dependent on the emotional processing, information processing, and though process of the person. It provides the chance for the two-way communication and thought process to recognize the capacity of the individual for change, analyze the values and gathering of the strength. 
	As suggested by Rudo-Stern, Mauricio, and Dishion (2019), strength-based theory suggested that people must be given habitable condition for an individual, so that they can see the best in themselves. This is helpful in bringing the values by just being the way they are. These values capitalize their strength and focus must be made on positive characters instead of the negative characteristics. This theory examines both individual and its environment. It also identifies the constrains which holds the individual for developing and acquiring growth in their life. 
	As suggested by Howe (2017), there are six main standards which helps in identifying the strength-based theory. The standards which are maintained by strength-based theory are assessment of strength, orientation of goals, making meaningful choice, use of different strategy for different situation, resources from the environment, and formation of relationship by inducing hope. In context of orientation of goal, it is necessary for individual to set the goals. In context of assessment of strength, the individual identifies and assesses the strength and inheriting of the resources. In resources from the environment, the available resources are linked with the environment. The resources can be association, individual, group or institution.
	In case of using of the different methods for different situations, solution-focused therapy must be used. This therapy guide client to determine its strength and goals. In hope-inducing relationship, strength of the person is used to make the social connections with culture, community, and people. As noted by Jackson, Dillon, Bennett, and Regis (2019), in context of the meaningful choice, every individual is expert about its strength, hopes and resources. The strength-based approach is driven by certain principles like every individual have unique characteristic which is evolved during the journey. Things which receives attention or focus becomes what client strive for become reality. As noted by Coady, and Lehmann (2016), the language used by social worker creates client’s reality. The client accepts the change, life, and ever-evolving world. It supports others as authentically. It builds upon what people know and experience to dream the future. This capacity builds multiple facets and organizations. It is collaborative approach and adaptive in nature. 
	As noted by Collins (2018), one of the best attributes to the strength-based theory is that it is inclined towards the mutual between client and the practitioner. The relationship established between practitioner and client is completely dependent on the quality of the relationship.

Theoretical overview and critique XXXXXXXXXXwords (no more than 10% over the word limit) Due: Friday 20th September, 9am Choose two (2) from the following list of theories for social work • Systems...

Answer To: Theoretical overview and critique XXXXXXXXXXwords (no more than 10% over the word limit) Due: Friday...

Answer To This Question Is Available To Download

Related Questions & Answers

Submit New Assignment