This is a 1000 worded
Academic report for
Sustainable Procurement in Hospitality, Expert need to write an analytical report about how sustainable development relates to hospitality and procurement. The report should cover the topics such as the rationale of sustainable development, Sustainable development and the hospitality industry & Procurement in hospitality. The quality of the work expected is Answer the all Questions which is given, with excellent grammar, clear and precise. Don't do plagiarism, moreover if you took facts /Figures or idea from other authors, provide HarvardReferencingwithcitation. I also provide with 3 weeks lecture notes use it. Provide me with good solution.
Sustainable Procurement in Hospitality -Academic Report -Expectation for this Assignment This is due on 01/04/2020 – at sharp 6 am o’clock Word limit is 1000 words No plagiarism (No copy pasting from other sources such as Book, journals social media etc) Instructions: Students are to write an analytical report about- how sustainable development relates to hospitality and procurement Each report should cover the topics that are covered during the following lectures: • The rationale of sustainable development (Lecture 1) • Sustainable development and the hospitality industry (Lecture 2) • Procurement in hospitality (Lecture 3) Report Structure: Introduction Your introduction should state the topic that you are covering and the aim of the analytical report. Detail below should be related to each part of your assignment (Description of what you have learned, why it is important, procurement, implications for hospitality) Body Please provide an outline of what you have learned from your chosen topic. You may wish to use the following headings as a guide: (Need to include all the points that I highlighted in italics below for body) • Description of what is sustainable development? • Procurement practices in hospitality? • Sustainability practices, including procurement in hospitality? • Implications for hospitality - social, cultural, economic and environmental implications of sustainable practices in hospitality ?(Need to address at least 3 ) Summary/Discussion and Conclusion The conclusion should contain a brief statement of all topics discussed in this report draft. Please do not include any new information. Reference List The reference list should include at least 6 references (4 academic and 2 non-academic). It should be presented in alphabetical order and please remember to follow the Harvard Reference Style. Instruction This is a 1000 worded Academic report for Sustainable Procurement in Hospitality, Expert need to write an analytical report about how sustainable development relates to hospitality and procurement. The report should cover the topics such as the rationale of sustainable development, Sustainable development and the hospitality industry & Procurement in hospitality. The quality of the work expected is Answer the all Questions which is given, with excellent grammar, clear and precise. Don't do plagiarism, moreover if you took facts /Figures or idea from other authors, provide Harvard Referencing with citation ASSESSMENT 1: INDIVIDUAL REPORT Weighting: 20% of final mark Due Date: This assignment is due on 29 March (11:59 pm) via Moodle. Submission: Moodle and Turnitin Word limit: 1000 words Subject Learning Outcomes Assessed: LO2. Discuss the social, economic, and environmental implications of sustainable practices in hospitality. LO3. Evaluate products and services selection in relation to sustainable hospitality practices. Instructions: Students are to write an analytical report about how sustainable development relates to hospitality and procurement Each report should cover the topics that are covered during the following lectures: • The rationale of sustainable development • Sustainable development and the hospitality industry • Procurement in hospitality Structure: Introduction Your introduction should state the topic that you are covering and the aim of the analytical report. Detail below should be related to each part of your assignment (Description of what you have learned, why it is important, procurement, implications for hospitality) Body Please provide an outline of what you have learned from your chosen topic. You may wish to use the following headings as a guide: • Description of what is sustainable development • Procurement practices in hospitality • Sustainability practices, including procurement in hospitality • Implications for hospitality - social, cultural, economic and environmental implications of sustainable practices in hospitality Summary/Discussion and Conclusion The conclusion should contain a brief statement of all topics discussed in this report draft. Please do not include any new information. Reference List The reference list should include at least 6 references (4 academic and 2 non-academic). It should be presented in alphabetical order and please remember to follow the Harvard Reference Style. Appendix (if needed) Marks General Information - 20 Evidence of research - 25 Analysis of information - 25 Writing style - 15 Referencing – Harvard Reference Style - 10 Academic Report Requirements - 5 Total (100 marks) A marking rubric is available on your Moodle site and is also made available on the following page. Marking criteria Assessment 1: Individual Report HD (80-100%) D (70-79%) CR (60-69%) PA (50-59%) N (<50%) general information excellent information of the topic. excellent direction outlined in this section. excellent level of detail given. 3 or more references provided. very good information of the topic. very clear direction outlined in this section. very good level of detail given. 2 or more references provided good information of the topic. clear direction outlined in this section. good level of detail given. 2 or more references provided. adequate/basic information of the topic. somewhat clear direction outlined in this section. minimal detail given. at least 4 sources provided. no substantial information of the topic demonstrated. no clear direction outlined in this section. little or no detail give. less than 2 sources provided. evidence of research excellent knowledge and/or understanding of the topic. excellent direction outlined in this section. excellent level of detail given. 3 or more references provided. very good knowledge and/or understanding of the topic. very clear direction outlined in this section. very good level of detail given. 2 or more references provided good knowledge and/or understanding of the topic. clear direction outlined in this section. good level of detail given. 2 or more references provided. adequate/basic knowledge and/or understanding of the topic. somewhat clear direction outlined in this section. minimal detail given. at least 2 sources provided. no substantial knowledge and/or understanding of the topic demonstrated. no clear direction outlined in this section. little or no detail give. less than 2 sources provided. analysis of information excellent analysis of the topic. excellent demonstration of deep and complex analysis relevant to the assessment. excellent range of issues linked to the analysis provided. 3 or more references provided. very good analysis of the topic. very good demonstration of deep analysis relevant to the assessment. very good range of issues linked to the analysis provided. 2 or more references provided good analysis of the topic. sound demonstration of deep analysis relevant to the assessment. good range of issues linked to the analysis provided. 2 or more references provided. adequate/basic analysis of the topic. adequate demonstration of analysis, however, not in sufficient depth. basic range of issues provided. at least 2 sources provided. no substantial analysis of the topic demonstrated. poor and superficial demonstration of analysis. issues identified were not linked to the analysis provided. less than 2 sources provided. writing style excellent variety of sentence structures and lengths, showing an excellent control of word choice with a clear, concise style. very good variety of sentence structures showing control of word choice with a clear style. good variety of sentence structure, showing adequate control of word choice with an inconsistently clear, style. a lack sentence variety, showing imprecise use of word choice with an inconsistent, wordy style. serious and frequent problems with word choice and sentence structure, showing a lack of style. referencing – harvard reference style excellent use of references, wide variety of relevant (including academic) references sourced, correctly referenced with no errors, 3 or more references appropriately applied within the report. reference list provided, listed in alphabetical order. very good use of references, wide variety of relevant (including academic) references sourced, correctly referenced with no errors, 2 references appropriately applied within the report. reference list provided, listed in alphabetical order. good use of references, good variety of relevant (including academic) references sourced, correctly referenced with no errors, 2 references appropriately applied within the report. reference list provided, listed in alphabetical order. basic use of references, basic variety of relevant (including academic) references sourced. mostly correctly referenced with some errors, at least 2 references appropriately applied within the report. reference list provided, listed in alphabetical order. less than 2 references provided. complete reliance on web references (non-academic). over reliance of one reference. academic report requirements report fulfills all requirements: • table of contents • correct headings used • correct use of grammar and spelling. • page numbers supplied • times new roman pt 12, 1.5 line spacing • appendices report fulfills majority of report requirements • table of contents • correct headings used • correct use of grammar and spelling. • page numbers supplied • times new roman pt 12, 1.5 line spacing • appendices report fulfills most of report requirements • table of contents • correct headings used • correct use of grammar and spelling. • page numbers supplied • times new roman pt 12, 1.5 line spacing • appendices report includes some of the report requirements. some elements missing. • table of contents • correct headings used • correct use of grammar and spelling. • page numbers supplied • times new roman pt 12, 1.5 line spacing • appendices report does not include majority of the report requirements set out by this general="" information="" excellent="" information="" of="" the="" topic.="" excellent="" direction="" outlined="" in="" this="" section.="" excellent="" level="" of="" detail="" given.="" 3="" or="" more="" references="" provided.="" very="" good="" information="" of="" the="" topic.="" very="" clear="" direction="" outlined="" in="" this="" section.="" very="" good="" level="" of="" detail="" given.="" 2="" or="" more="" references="" provided="" good="" information="" of="" the="" topic.="" clear="" direction="" outlined="" in="" this="" section.="" good="" level="" of="" detail="" given.="" 2="" or="" more="" references="" provided.="" adequate/basic="" information="" of="" the="" topic.="" somewhat="" clear="" direction="" outlined="" in="" this="" section.="" minimal="" detail="" given.="" at="" least="" 4="" sources="" provided.="" no="" substantial="" information="" of="" the="" topic="" demonstrated.="" no="" clear="" direction="" outlined="" in="" this="" section.="" little="" or="" no="" detail="" give.="" less="" than="" 2="" sources="" provided.="" evidence="" of="" research="" excellent="" knowledge="" and/or="" understanding="" of="" the="" topic.="" excellent="" direction="" outlined="" in="" this="" section.="" excellent="" level="" of="" detail="" given.="" 3="" or="" more="" references="" provided.="" very="" good="" knowledge="" and/or="" understanding="" of="" the="" topic.="" very="" clear="" direction="" outlined="" in="" this="" section.="" very="" good="" level="" of="" detail="" given.="" 2="" or="" more="" references="" provided="" good="" knowledge="" and/or="" understanding="" of="" the="" topic.="" clear="" direction="" outlined="" in="" this="" section.="" good="" level="" of="" detail="" given.="" 2="" or="" more="" references="" provided.="" adequate/basic="" knowledge="" and/or="" understanding="" of="" the="" topic.="" somewhat="" clear="" direction="" outlined="" in="" this="" section.="" minimal="" detail="" given.="" at="" least="" 2="" sources="" provided.="" no="" substantial="" knowledge="" and/or="" understanding="" of="" the="" topic="" demonstrated.="" no="" clear="" direction="" outlined="" in="" this="" section.="" little="" or="" no="" detail="" give.="" less="" than="" 2="" sources="" provided.="" analysis="" of="" information="" excellent="" analysis="" of="" the="" topic.="" excellent="" demonstration="" of="" deep="" and="" complex="" analysis="" relevant="" to="" the="" assessment.="" excellent="" range="" of="" issues="" linked="" to="" the="" analysis="" provided.="" 3="" or="" more="" references="" provided.="" very="" good="" analysis="" of="" the="" topic.="" very="" good="" demonstration="" of="" deep="" analysis="" relevant="" to="" the="" assessment.="" very="" good="" range="" of="" issues="" linked="" to="" the="" analysis="" provided.="" 2="" or="" more="" references="" provided="" good="" analysis="" of="" the="" topic.="" sound="" demonstration="" of="" deep="" analysis="" relevant="" to="" the="" assessment.="" good="" range="" of="" issues="" linked="" to="" the="" analysis="" provided.="" 2="" or="" more="" references="" provided.="" adequate/basic="" analysis="" of="" the="" topic.="" adequate="" demonstration="" of="" analysis,="" however,="" not="" in="" sufficient="" depth.="" basic="" range="" of="" issues="" provided.="" at="" least="" 2="" sources="" provided.="" no="" substantial="" analysis="" of="" the="" topic="" demonstrated.="" poor="" and="" superficial="" demonstration="" of="" analysis.="" issues="" identified="" were="" not="" linked="" to="" the="" analysis="" provided.="" less="" than="" 2="" sources="" provided.="" writing="" style="" excellent="" variety="" of="" sentence="" structures="" and="" lengths,="" showing="" an="" excellent="" control="" of="" word="" choice="" with="" a="" clear,="" concise="" style.="" very="" good="" variety="" of="" sentence="" structures="" showing="" control="" of="" word="" choice="" with="" a="" clear="" style.="" good="" variety="" of="" sentence="" structure,="" showing="" adequate="" control="" of="" word="" choice="" with="" an="" inconsistently="" clear,="" style.="" a="" lack="" sentence="" variety,="" showing="" imprecise="" use="" of="" word="" choice="" with="" an="" inconsistent,="" wordy="" style.="" serious="" and="" frequent="" problems="" with="" word="" choice="" and="" sentence="" structure,="" showing="" a="" lack="" of="" style.="" referencing="" –="" harvard="" reference="" style="" excellent="" use="" of="" references,="" wide="" variety="" of="" relevant="" (including="" academic)="" references="" sourced,="" correctly="" referenced="" with="" no="" errors,="" 3="" or="" more="" references="" appropriately="" applied="" within="" the="" report.="" reference="" list="" provided,="" listed="" in="" alphabetical="" order.="" very="" good="" use="" of="" references,="" wide="" variety="" of="" relevant="" (including="" academic)="" references="" sourced,="" correctly="" referenced="" with="" no="" errors,="" 2="" references="" appropriately="" applied="" within="" the="" report.="" reference="" list="" provided,="" listed="" in="" alphabetical="" order.="" good="" use="" of="" references,="" good="" variety="" of="" relevant="" (including="" academic)="" references="" sourced,="" correctly="" referenced="" with="" no="" errors,="" 2="" references="" appropriately="" applied="" within="" the="" report.="" reference="" list="" provided,="" listed="" in="" alphabetical="" order.="" basic="" use="" of="" references,="" basic="" variety="" of="" relevant="" (including="" academic)="" references="" sourced.="" mostly="" correctly="" referenced="" with="" some="" errors,="" at="" least="" 2="" references="" appropriately="" applied="" within="" the="" report.="" reference="" list="" provided,="" listed="" in="" alphabetical="" order.="" less="" than="" 2="" references="" provided.="" complete="" reliance="" on="" web="" references="" (non-academic).="" over="" reliance="" of="" one="" reference.="" academic="" report="" requirements="" report="" fulfills="" all="" requirements:="" •="" table="" of="" contents="" •="" correct="" headings="" used="" •="" correct="" use="" of="" grammar="" and="" spelling.="" •="" page="" numbers="" supplied="" •="" times="" new="" roman="" pt="" 12,="" 1.5="" line="" spacing="" •="" appendices="" report="" fulfills="" majority="" of="" report="" requirements="" •="" table="" of="" contents="" •="" correct="" headings="" used="" •="" correct="" use="" of="" grammar="" and="" spelling.="" •="" page="" numbers="" supplied="" •="" times="" new="" roman="" pt="" 12,="" 1.5="" line="" spacing="" •="" appendices="" report="" fulfills="" most="" of="" report="" requirements="" •="" table="" of="" contents="" •="" correct="" headings="" used="" •="" correct="" use="" of="" grammar="" and="" spelling.="" •="" page="" numbers="" supplied="" •="" times="" new="" roman="" pt="" 12,="" 1.5="" line="" spacing="" •="" appendices="" report="" includes="" some="" of="" the="" report="" requirements.="" some="" elements="" missing.="" •="" table="" of="" contents="" •="" correct="" headings="" used="" •="" correct="" use="" of="" grammar="" and="" spelling.="" •="" page="" numbers="" supplied="" •="" times="" new="" roman="" pt="" 12,="" 1.5="" line="" spacing="" •="" appendices="" report="" does="" not="" include="" majority="" of="" the="" report="" requirements="" set="" out="" by="">50%) general information excellent information of the topic. excellent direction outlined in this section. excellent level of detail given. 3 or more references provided. very good information of the topic. very clear direction outlined in this section. very good level of detail given. 2 or more references provided good information of the topic. clear direction outlined in this section. good level of detail given. 2 or more references provided. adequate/basic information of the topic. somewhat clear direction outlined in this section. minimal detail given. at least 4 sources provided. no substantial information of the topic demonstrated. no clear direction outlined in this section. little or no detail give. less than 2 sources provided. evidence of research excellent knowledge and/or understanding of the topic. excellent direction outlined in this section. excellent level of detail given. 3 or more references provided. very good knowledge and/or understanding of the topic. very clear direction outlined in this section. very good level of detail given. 2 or more references provided good knowledge and/or understanding of the topic. clear direction outlined in this section. good level of detail given. 2 or more references provided. adequate/basic knowledge and/or understanding of the topic. somewhat clear direction outlined in this section. minimal detail given. at least 2 sources provided. no substantial knowledge and/or understanding of the topic demonstrated. no clear direction outlined in this section. little or no detail give. less than 2 sources provided. analysis of information excellent analysis of the topic. excellent demonstration of deep and complex analysis relevant to the assessment. excellent range of issues linked to the analysis provided. 3 or more references provided. very good analysis of the topic. very good demonstration of deep analysis relevant to the assessment. very good range of issues linked to the analysis provided. 2 or more references provided good analysis of the topic. sound demonstration of deep analysis relevant to the assessment. good range of issues linked to the analysis provided. 2 or more references provided. adequate/basic analysis of the topic. adequate demonstration of analysis, however, not in sufficient depth. basic range of issues provided. at least 2 sources provided. no substantial analysis of the topic demonstrated. poor and superficial demonstration of analysis. issues identified were not linked to the analysis provided. less than 2 sources provided. writing style excellent variety of sentence structures and lengths, showing an excellent control of word choice with a clear, concise style. very good variety of sentence structures showing control of word choice with a clear style. good variety of sentence structure, showing adequate control of word choice with an inconsistently clear, style. a lack sentence variety, showing imprecise use of word choice with an inconsistent, wordy style. serious and frequent problems with word choice and sentence structure, showing a lack of style. referencing – harvard reference style excellent use of references, wide variety of relevant (including academic) references sourced, correctly referenced with no errors, 3 or more references appropriately applied within the report. reference list provided, listed in alphabetical order. very good use of references, wide variety of relevant (including academic) references sourced, correctly referenced with no errors, 2 references appropriately applied within the report. reference list provided, listed in alphabetical order. good use of references, good variety of relevant (including academic) references sourced, correctly referenced with no errors, 2 references appropriately applied within the report. reference list provided, listed in alphabetical order. basic use of references, basic variety of relevant (including academic) references sourced. mostly correctly referenced with some errors, at least 2 references appropriately applied within the report. reference list provided, listed in alphabetical order. less than 2 references provided. complete reliance on web references (non-academic). over reliance of one reference. academic report requirements report fulfills all requirements: • table of contents • correct headings used • correct use of grammar and spelling. • page numbers supplied • times new roman pt 12, 1.5 line spacing • appendices report fulfills majority of report requirements • table of contents • correct headings used • correct use of grammar and spelling. • page numbers supplied • times new roman pt 12, 1.5 line spacing • appendices report fulfills most of report requirements • table of contents • correct headings used • correct use of grammar and spelling. • page numbers supplied • times new roman pt 12, 1.5 line spacing • appendices report includes some of the report requirements. some elements missing. • table of contents • correct headings used • correct use of grammar and spelling. • page numbers supplied • times new roman pt 12, 1.5 line spacing • appendices report does not include majority of the report requirements set out by this>