Write a short report (up to 2000 words) on the protein MYC and examples where researchers have used bioinformatics techniques to conduct a drug discovery and development program. You need to include literature references and figures to illustrate your analysis.BIOL2254 Tutorial 3 Assessment Rubric Semester 2, 2021 Page 1 of 4 RMIT Classification: Trusted Part 1 Rubric: High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Not satisfactory Total Marks All questions There is an advanced and thorough understanding of the bioinformatics approaches used in the chosen research article, including an understanding of data sources/controls/similar techniques. There is a strong understanding of the bioinformatics approaches used in the chosen research article, including an understanding of data sources/controls/similar techniques. There may be minor omissions or errors. There is a reasonable understanding of the bioinformatics approaches used in the chosen research article. There may be omissions or errors. There is limited understanding of the bioinformatics approaches used in the chosen research article. There are major omissions or errors. There is an inadequate understanding of the bioinformatics approaches used in the chosen research article. 50 points Total: /50 BIOL2254 Tutorial 3 Assessment Rubric Semester 2, 2021 Page 2 of 4 RMIT Classification: Trusted Part 2 Rubric: High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Not satisfactory Total Marks Introduction Introduction clearly introduces the topic and broader context, demonstrating an advanced understanding of the broader research field. Key bioinformatics terms are defined clearly and simply. Introduction includes an appropriate level of detail to enable a general scientific audience to understand the research being discussed. Introduction clearly introduces the topic and broader context, demonstrating a good understanding of the broader research field. Key bioinformatics terms are defined. Introduction includes an appropriate level of detail to enable a general scientific audience to understand the research being discussed. There may be minor errors in understanding. Introduction introduces the topic and broader context, demonstrating a reasonable understanding of the broader research field. Key bioinformatics terms may be defined but are difficult to understand from the description. There may be errors in understanding. Introduction adequately describes the topic, demonstrating an acceptable understanding of the broader research field. Key bioinformatics terms are either defined poorly or otherwise missing. There are major errors in understanding. Introduction does not adequately describe the topic. Key bioinformatics terms are not defined. There are major errors in understanding. 10 points Body Discussion of chosen research article is clear and articulate, demonstrating an advanced understanding of the chosen research article and surrounding work. Scientific language used is appropriate for a general scientific audience, with key bioinformatics concepts clearly explained. Discussion of chosen research article is generally clear and articulate, demonstrating a good understanding of the chosen research article. Scientific language used is generally appropriate for a general scientific audience, with key bioinformatics Discussion of chosen research article demonstrates a reasonable understanding of the chosen research article. Scientific language used is generally appropriate for a general scientific audience, although there may be unnecessary use of overly technical language. Key bioinformatics concepts Discussion of chosen research article demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the chosen research article. Scientific language used may be inappropriate for a general scientific audience, with unnecessary use of overly technical language. There is an Discussion of chosen research article demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the chosen research article. Scientific language used is inappropriate for a general scientific audience. Key bioinformatics concepts are not explained. 20 points BIOL2254 Tutorial 3 Assessment Rubric Semester 2, 2021 Page 3 of 4 RMIT Classification: Trusted concepts clearly explained. There may be minor errors in understanding. are explained, although these explanations may be overly convoluted or otherwise inadequate. There may be errors in understanding. attempt to explain key bioinformatics concepts, although these explanations are overly technical or otherwise flawed. There may be major errors in understanding. Conclusion and future directions Response contains a clear conclusion that accurately summarizes the major advances made in the chosen research article, as well as providing well- researched and insightful suggestions for future research. Response contains a clear conclusion that summarizes the major advances made in the chosen research article, as well as providing suggestions for future research. There may be minor errors in understanding. Response contains a conclusion that summarizes some of the advances made in the chosen research article. Suggestions for future research are present but may be poorly researched. There may be errors in understanding. Response contains a conclusion that adequately summarizes the chosen research article. Suggestions for future research are absent. There are significant errors in understanding. Response does not contain a conclusion or contains a conclusion that does not adequately summarize the chosen research article. 10 points Presentation (grammar, sentence structure, spelling, formatting) Minimal spelling & grammatical errors. Writing style is appropriate to the task. Document is formatted appropriately (including header/footer/page numbers). Some spelling & grammatical errors. Writing style is mostly appropriate to the task. Document is generally formatted appropriately. A reasonable number of spelling & grammatical errors. Writing style is mostly appropriate to the task at times, but with lapses throughout. Document formatting may need improvement. Spelling & grammatical errors throughout but do not interfere with meaning. Writing style may be overly informal or not appropriately suited to the task. Document formatting needs considerable improvement. Consistent spelling & grammatical errors throughout that make understanding difficult. Writing style is not appropriate for to the task. Document formatting is unsatisfactory. 5 points BIOL2254 Tutorial 3 Assessment Rubric Semester 2, 2021 Page 4 of 4 RMIT Classification: Trusted Referencing References consistently conform to the appropriate referencing conventions, both in-text and in the reference list References mostly conform to the appropriate referencing conventions, both in- text and in the reference list References generally conform to the appropriate referencing conventions, both in-text and in the reference list References generally conform to the appropriate referencing conventions, both in- text and in the reference list, with some lapses References do not conform to the appropriate referencing conventions, in text and/or in the reference list 5 points Total: /50